New Delhi: Anti-corruption watchdog Lokpal has rejected a corruption complaint against rebel Trinamool Congress member of Parliament Arup Chakraborty, after a preliminary enquiry by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) found that the allegations were “unsubstantiated”.
The order was passed last week, by the bench comprising Chairperson Justice A.M. Khanwilkar, and five members—Justice L. Narayana Swamy, Justice Sanjay Yadav, Sushil Chandra, Pankaj Kumar and Ajay Tirkey.
Chakraborty, who is a Lok Sabha MP from the Bankura seat, had merged with the little-known Nationalist Citizens Party of India (NCPI) along with 19 other TMC MPs in June this year, extending their support to the NDA.
“…this complaint is disposed of being devoid of merit,” the bench said.
Among other things, the allegations pertained to ‘Suchitra Children’s and Recreation Park’ owned by Arup’s brother Asish Chakraborty. Arup was accused of using his brother as a conduit to indulge in illegal activities, which included unauthorised construction and encroachment over a water body in Mejia in Bankura district of West Bengal. It was alleged that the “constructions were developed illegally by diverting government funds to the tune of approx. Rs. 100 crores,” and that illegal money was being earned from this jhill (lake), as boating and entry fee, amounting to Rs 50 lakhs per month.
The Lokpal had, in November 2025, directed the CBI to conduct a preliminary enquiry into the allegations under provisions of the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act 2013.
The enquiry officer submitted a report in August 2026, after collecting 45 documents and recording the statements of at least six witnesses. The report also included comments from Chakraborty.
The Lokpal has now observed: “Suffice it to observe that the allegations in the complaint have not been substantiated during the PI. We agree with the analysis of the relevant documents; and the conclusion reached by the IO in that regard. Nothing more needs to be done in the fact situation of the present case…”
It found “no evidence with regard to political pressure or interference” pertaining to the issue of the trade licence of the recreation park, and noted that it was issued, and renewed as per the law.
The bench also noted that the alleged activities were during the period on or before 2024 when Chakraborty was a Member of Legislative Council and not a Member of Parliament. Therefore, these activities would be excluded from the ambit of the 2013 law, which covers only MPs, central government employees, members of corporations, boards, or trusts established as a central law, or funded by the Union government or the state government, and not MLAs.
Also Read: Behind NCPI, the refuge of TMC rebel MPs: A lawyer, ‘famous mathematician’ & motivational speaker
The allegations
The enquiry officer looked into six allegations against Chakraborty.
The first pertained to the allegation that Chakraborty was “managing illegal activities through his brother” Asish Chakraborty, and that the latter was “acting as a conduit to execute the corrupt designs of Shri Arup Chakraborty including collection of illegal proceeds, coercing local residents with the support of local officials”.
It was alleged that the trade license of Suchitra Children’s and Recreation Park, which is Asish Chakraborty’s property, was cancelled by the Block Development Officer (BDO), on the ground of “serious discrepancies regarding the legality of the land and misrepresentation of facts”.
Further, the complainant alleged that the original license was obtained through misuse of political influence and collusion with certain local officials, in violation of the lawful process and without adherence to land ownership norms. Chakraborty was also accused of attempting to use undue political pressure to reinstate the cancelled license.
The complainant had also alleged that a government fishery project was being unlawfully handed over to Suchitra Fish Production Group, owned by Asish Chakraborty, even though the Group did not meet the eligibility criteria. Additionally, it was alleged that a total area of 107.23 acres (CS record), which had been classified as a water body, was being encroached upon and converted into private ownership by Suchitra Fish Production Group.
“The said encroachment on the Tarapur Jhill (water body) had deprived around 600 farmers from using the water for irrigation & cultivation and approximately 200 families from catching fish from the said Jhill. Further, more than 1000 families are dependent on the said water body for their daily sustenance and livelihood,” the complainant had alleged, according to the Lokpal order.
It was also alleged that illegal earning from the Tarapur Jhill was being collected by Asish since 2016, as charges for fisheries, boating, and entry fee, among other things. “The said money, which amounts to approx. Rs.50 lakhs per month, has not been deposited into government exchequer,” said the complaint.
The consequence of the encroachment, as alleged, was that the area of the water body had drastically reduced from 107.23 acres to about 33 acres due to illegal reclamation and construction by Suchitra Fish Production Group.
(Edited by Amrtansh Arora)
Also Read: West Bengal has no room for NCPI. TMC rebels may soon have to choose BJP