scorecardresearch
Sunday, April 28, 2024
Support Our Journalism
HomeIndia‘Gross FCRA violations, unexplained export remittance’ — what CBI says in FIR...

‘Gross FCRA violations, unexplained export remittance’ — what CBI says in FIR against NewsClick

In FIR lodged on complaint by MHA undersecretary, CBI says the accused received foreign funding ‘in contravention’ of FCRA norms to ‘infuse opaque foreign funds’ into NewsClick.

Follow Us :
Text Size:

New Delhi: The allegation that it received “unexplained export remittance” to the tune of Rs 28.46 crore from four foreign-based entities and committed “gross violations” of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, formed the basis of the First Information Report (FIR) lodged by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) against NewsClick and others on 7 October.

The FIR, a copy of which is with ThePrint, was lodged after the CBI received a communication in this regard from the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) in August this year. The complainant in the case, an undersecretary in the MHA, further alleged that NewsClick received additional funding amounting to Rs 9.59 crore from a US-based entity “in contravention of provisions of the FCRA Act”.

Besides PPK Newsclick Studio Pvt. Ltd, the FIR names its founder-editor Prabir Purkayastha, ‘investor’ Neville Roy Singham and his associate Jason Pfetcher, among others, as the accused.

On Wednesday, NewsClick in a post on X said the CBI conducted “search and seizure operations” at its office and Purkayastha’s residence, adding “this is the fifth agency that is investigating us”.

“The main allegation is that M/s PPK Newsclick Studio Pvt. Ltd. received unexplained export remittance of Rs. 28.46 Crores from four foreign entities in alleged violation of FCRA, 2010,” read the FIR.

It added, “Further M/s Worldwide Media Holding LLC, USA funded Rs. 9.59 Crores through FDI into PPK Newsclick in contravention of provisions of FCRA Act, 2010. The complaint discloses the gross violations of the provisions of FCRA Act, 2010 by Prabir Purkayastha along with his close associates namely Jason Pfetcher, and Neville Roy Singham to infuse opaque foreign funds in M/S PPK Newsclick Studio Pvt. Ltd.”

Section 3(1)(g) of the original FCRA states that “no foreign contribution shall be accepted by any association or company engaged in the production of audio news or audio visual news or current affairs programmes through any electronic mode, or any other electronic form as defined in clause (r) of sub-section (l) of section 2 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 or any other mode of mass communication”.

ThePrint had reported earlier that there was infusion of Rs 9.59 crore for a 7.69 percent stake in PPK Newsclick Studio Pvt Ltd in 2018-19 and that starting the next financial year, “export of services” became the news portal’s primary mode of revenue. The “export of services” accounted for 99.87, 99.97 and 99.95 percent of its total revenue in the financial years 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-22, respectively.

In a statement it issued earlier this month, NewsClick maintained that “all funding received” by it “has been through the appropriate banking channels and have been reported to the relevant authorities as required by law, as substantiated by the Reserve Bank of India in proceedings before the High Court of Delhi”.


Also Read: NewsClick FIR says Chinese phone-makers set up ‘thousands of shell companies in India to funnel funds’


UAPA case, Singham & Pfetcher

The Delhi Police Special Cell had on 3 October arrested NewsClick’s founder-editor Prabir Purkayastha and administrative officer Amit Chakraborty in connection with a case filed against them under various provisions of the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA).

In August, The New York Times reported that NewsClick received funding from a network with links to US-based millionaire Singham, which it said was part of a “global web of Chinese propaganda”. It added that Indian authorities raided NewsClick, “accusing it of having ties to the Chinese government but offering no proof”.

The claim that NewsClick received funding from Singham was first made by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in 2021. 

Boxes of material confiscated from office of NewsClick being brought to Delhi Police Special Cell | PTI
Boxes of material confiscated from office of NewsClick being brought to Delhi Police Special Cell | PTI

NewsClick has maintained that it “does not propagate Chinese propaganda” or “take directions from Neville Roy Singham regarding the content published on its website”. 

Further, Jason Pfetcher, the ‘manager’ for WorldWide Media Holdings (WHM) — a US-based for-profit group whose investment in NewsClick was the basis for the UAPA case filed against the news portal by the Delhi Police, said in a statement on 7 October that WMH is a ‘not-for profit investment vehicle wholly owned and operated’ by People’s Support Foundation (PSF).

“All funds to PSF came from the sale of ThoughtWorks” — Chicago-based software consultancy of which Singham is founder and former chairman — Pfetcher added.

(Edited by Amrtansh Arora)


Also Read: Headlines say it all—NewsClick coverage shows a deeply divided Indian media


 

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube, Telegram & WhatsApp

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular