Tuesday, 9 August, 2022
HomeIndiaGovernanceSushma Swaraj of 2018: A pale shadow of the once firebrand leader

Sushma Swaraj of 2018: A pale shadow of the once firebrand leader

Text Size:

The irrelevance of Sushma Swaraj to politics is fast becoming obvious, and her silence on MJ Akbar & MeToo is tellingly reflective of her diminished position.

New Delhi: Amid the blazing controversy surrounding sexual harassment allegations against Minister of State for External Affairs M.J. Akbar, conspicuous by her silence has been one of the senior-most woman BJP leaders who has always been known for her firebrand oratory and uninhibited views.

External affairs minister Sushma Swaraj — Akbar’s direct boss, the most senior woman in the Union Cabinet, and a member of the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) — has refused to utter a word not just on the charges against him, but on the MeToo movement altogether.

This, even though her fellow women ministers — Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, Textiles Minister Smriti Irani, and Drinking Water and Sanitation Minister Uma Bharti — have made statements, albeit non-committal ones, on the issue.

Also read: MJ Akbar won’t resign, calls all #MeToo allegations political vendetta

While Sitharaman and Irani said they were not the right people to comment on allegations against Akbar, but supported the MeToo movement, Bharti said the matter was between “Akbar and the women”.

Only Women and Child Development Minister Maneka Gandhi took a strong position on the matter, calling for an investigation.

Even so, coaxed several times for a comment, Swaraj has refused to offer one.

Political irrelevance

From her famous declaration in 2004 that she would tonsure her head and live like a widow if Italian-origin Sonia Gandhi, then the Congress president, became Prime Minister, to her deafening silence on the MeToo movement — the Swaraj of today is a pale shadow of her former feisty avatar.

Her silence, one might say, is reflective of her diminished position in the BJP and fading political stature.

A basic parameter to judge the influence of a leader in their party is often the weight they carry in decision-making on important internal matters — whether determining the election strategy in a state, or picking poll candidates, framing parliamentary strategy and tactics, shaping the political narrative of the government (if in power) or opposition, and deciding on organisational positions within the party structure.

Take any of this, and the irrelevance of Swaraj to the BJP’s politics becomes obvious.

“Sushmaji is hardly a part of any decision-making process with respect to the party,” said a highly placed source in the BJP who did not wish to be identified.

“Imagine, for someone who was once such a vocal voice, an asset and a key part of the BJP’s strategising, to not be involved in taking party-related decisions at all,” the source added.

Between 2009 and 2014, Swaraj was the leader of the opposition in the Lok Sabha, the most visible face and vocal voice for the BJP in the House, with an important say in its floor strategy.

Today, she has little say in how the government decides its parliamentary strategy.

Someone who has fought elections for over four decades across states is completely out of the loop on the party’s big decisions on elections — except as part of the parliamentary board, which merely rubber-stamps decisions taken elsewhere.

Swaraj has been one of the party’s sharpest communicators, a leader who was often fielded to defend the party in tricky situations.

Since 2014, however, when the BJP catapulted to power after a campaign led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Swaraj has been near-invisible when it comes to defending the party on difficult issues of the day, or even attacking the opposition.

Swaraj’s proximity to the Modi rival camp, led by veteran leader L.K. Advani, was hardly a secret, and her political trajectory in the party has been more than just a side-effect of that.

Sources in the BJP said although Swaraj is a tall leader who occupies the front benches in Parliament, the fact that she is a “far diminished leader today is for all to see”.

“That is how she has made peace with Modi,” said the party source.

“Despite being uncomfortable with his rise, Swaraj recognised that if she wanted space and respect within this set-up, she would have to let go of any ambitions to shape the party,” the source added.

“She accepted the portfolio she was given but also accepted that she would only be a pale shadow of her political self,” the source said. “It is this trade-off that has preserved her position, but left her diminished.”

What has further added to her woes is her fast vanishing mass base. Swaraj is a Lok Sabha member from Vidisha in Madhya Pradesh, but hardly has a voter base to speak of anymore, despite her extensive stint in electoral politics as a four-term Lok Sabha member, an MLA in home state Haryana and Delhi chief minister.

Swaraj is hardly the mass, popular face the BJP would use in an election campaign, despite her impressive oratory skills.

“The fact that Swaraj is an MP from a state to which she does not belong makes her political base even trickier,” said another party leader.

“Add to this the fact that she has been a socialist, who participated in the JP (Jayaprakash Narayan) movement,” the leader added. “This means that she does not have a base in the Sangh, and that she does not fully fit in. This makes her political position in the BJP currently even less solid.”

What further dented Swaraj’s position was the 2015 ‘Lalitgate’ scandal, where she was accused of helping the tainted former Indian Premier League boss Lalit Modi.

The opposition demanded Swaraj’s resignation and an adjournment motion was moved by the Congress in the Lok Sabha to hold a discussion on the allegations. Although the Modi government did not ask her to step down, no one stuck their neck out in her defence either.

Her isolation was on full display earlier this year, when the party failed to address the abuse she received from trolls for pulling up a passport officer accused of harassing an inter-faith couple during the application process.

The lone voice of condemnation came from Home Minister Rajnath Singh days after the attack began, with her women ministerial colleagues choosing to stay silent.

The minister who isn’t

It is not just in the realm of politics, but also in policy that Swaraj stands on the periphery.

She holds one of the top four ministries in the government but has often been referred to as ‘Twitter minister’, handling consular issues and helping Indians in distress on the social media platform.

To be fair, this initiative is one Swaraj should get credit for, and party colleagues admit her annual briefings do reflect that she actually “comprehends her ministry well and can speak with remarkable sharpness on a range of issues”.

But again, it is no secret that she is does not exercise the influence a minister should over her/his domain.

Also read: MJ Akbar sues Priya Ramani for criminal defamation over sexual harassment allegations

While the foreign ministry has always been less autonomous because the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) has directly had a say in relations with other countries, Swaraj’s tenure has seen a near-complete takeover in this arena by Modi’s powerful PMO. As a result, she has had a limited role, except in relations with a few countries.

For one, this is an exceptionally centralised government where the PMO is even more assertive than usual. Then, within the PMO, there is an all-powerful National Security Adviser (NSA) who plays a big part in foreign policy. NSA Ajit Doval is now the head of the Strategic Policy Group, a post earlier held by the cabinet secretary.

This effectively makes Doval all-powerful and raises questions about the role of the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) and whether its members, the top four ministers, including Sushma, will have any say in crucial decisions at all.

Sources in the government pointed out how, for much of Swaraj’s term, foreign secretary S. Jaishankar had a direct line with the PM. Meanwhile, the Sangh and the BJP too have an interest in world affairs. BJP general secretary Ram Madhav, in particular, has played a significant role in determining policy.

“These facts are for all to see,” said a government source. “So, ambassadors who want to make a push in a particular direction know they can press other buttons. It weakens the minister’s authority considerably.”

It doesn’t help that her health hasn’t quite been on her side either. In 2016, Swaraj underwent a kidney transplant at Delhi’s AIIMS.

Catch ThePrint’s in-depth, extensive coverage of the #MeToo movement in India here

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism


  1. Whether both Ushamaji and Jaitley ji got their kidneys out of turn comroising the strict protocol for organ transplant is a question which remains unanswered

  2. India’s foreign policy has suffered myriad of buffets from diverse sources, including from Foreign Service bureaucrats, extra-constitutional authorities, retired bureaucrats, and mediocre policy makers who hardly have a grasp over complexities and nuances of foreign policy and diplomacy. Indian politicians may be super experts in manipulating and mastering domestic politics but they cannot perform well in the field of foreign policy and international politics. But in a parliamentary democracy like ours, MPs of either house of the parliament can be assigned any portfolio whether the minister has the potential, experience and aura, for instance, to conduct foreign policy and diplomacy in a complex interdependent world order. In this situation, the top brass of the foreign policy establishment, and especially extra-constitutional power wielders who enjoy enormous powers without constitutional obligations to overshadow all important ministries .In India’s case, National Security Adviser, a concept and model borrowed from the United States, overshadows virtually every ministry directly or indirectly since the country’s national security has multiple dimensions, including non-traditional security threats. Therefore, the imperative of India’s national interests demand re-imagining, rethinking and reevaluating the core challenges to the foreign policy and diplomacy in order to tailor it to the hard boiled realities of an anarchic but an inevitably globalized integrated world order.

  3. After reading Shri Shekhar Gupta’s masterly column on the state of Indian foreign policy, the lady must have felt relieved that no one considers her its driving force.

  4. Yes it is true that her health condition has put down her to some extent. Fire Brand…whom you expect her to spew fire on her own party like other jokers who are started playing such games without resigning from the party, neither opposition believes them nor the people. rather than fall flat like these jokers it is better she has accepted the reality & worked so well & brought to the party its name & fame by handling her portfolio in a most efficient manner & helped the lot of people for their genuine request.

    True her association with Lalit Modi & his escape has made her bit nervous & the party leaders squirmed but they never asked her to resign in spite of pressure brought in & out of the parliament by the opposition parties.

    As per this article, if she has been sidelined or wants to side line that was the best opportunity for the party to relieve her from the Ministry. As a staunch supporter & disciplined worker of the party she has delivered her responsibility. It is wrong to read too much in this. May be she was a strong opponent for the decision to project the Narendra Modi ji for PM candidature. She was more vocal about it though personally she did not felt so but used by the other timid gangs to air their opinion through her by using her so called ‘Fire Brand’ nature. here she erred in playing in the hands of these guys. However, she has realized her mistake as a disciplinarian party worker she was back into fold & nobody has any qualms of her contribution to the party over four decades t o uptill now. Tx.

    • She’s a great leader I admire and respect her a lot. She’s done tremendous amount of work for the NRI community and people in general. Despite the opposition and it’s take on her during the Iraq crisis and the delay in the announcement. She handled it well. Doklam is something else all together. She would make a good PM, she’s not firebrand, so she won’t burn the house down. She’s old school from the days of atal ji and advani ji.

Comments are closed.

Most Popular