scorecardresearch
Add as a preferred source on Google
Thursday, October 22, 2026

Support our Journalism

Depth, context and analysis

Subscribe
HomeIndiaFIR registered in Ayodhya’s Ram Temple donation row

FIR registered in Ayodhya’s Ram Temple donation row

Meanwhile, Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav alleged that influential individuals were being shielded in the case.

Follow Us :
Text Size:

Lucknow: In an apparent validation of the allegations of Ram temple donation theft, an FIR was registered Thursday at Ayodhya’s Ram Janmabhoomi police station following a complaint filed by the Ram temple Trust.  

According to UP police officers, the FIR names eight individuals—Ramashankar Yadav alias Tinnu Yadav, Anukalp Mishra, Avinash Shukla, Manish Yadav, Ramashankar Mishra, Subhash, Karunesh and Lavkush Mishra. 

A senior police officer told ThePrint that the case has been registered under sections 306 (theft by clerk or servant, or by a person employed in a position of trust, 316 (criminal breach of trust, 317 (criminal breach of trust by public servant, banker, merchant, agent etc) and 61 (criminal conspiracy) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).

The development comes days after the Special Investigation Team (SIT) probing the matter submitted its preliminary report to the state government. The FIR was lodged following the report’s recommendations and directions from the Chief Minister’s Office.

Tinnu Yadav, one of the accused named in the FIR, is widely seen as being close to trust office-bearer Champat Rai.

The SIT had submitted its preliminary findings to the government earlier this week, triggering discussions about possible changes in the administrative structure of the Ram Temple Trust. According to sources, preparations are underway to appoint a retired officer as the trust’s new CEO.

Meanwhile, Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav alleged that influential individuals were being shielded in the case. In a post on social media platform X, he wrote:  “BJP raaj mein nainsaafi ki dikhegi jhaanki, fungi ko phansi, shaakhaon ko maafi (In BJP rule, this is how injustice will be displayed, the twig will be punished while the branches will be forgiven)”.

Akhilesh further claimed that evidence may have been erased under the pretext of the SIT investigation and questioned whether the probe had been designed to protect “big fish” while targeting others. He also suggested that the conclusions of the investigation may have been decided before the inquiry was conducted.

Earlier on Wednesday, addressing a press conference at the Samajwadi Party headquarters, Akhilesh had termed the alleged theft a “grave sin” and an affront to public faith. He said the donations belonged to devotees from across Uttar Pradesh, India and even abroad, making the issue highly sensitive.

Questioning the role and intent of the SIT, he remarked that the acronym could be interpreted as ‘Share in theft’, adding that the alleged misuse of donations raised serious concerns about accountability and transparency in the management of temple funds.

(Edited by Gitanjali Das)

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube, Telegram & WhatsApp

Nine Years, Made Possible by Readers

In 2017, Shekhar Gupta started ThePrint with a simple belief: Indian readers want journalism that asks why and what next, not just what. And that enough of them would be willing to pay for good journalism.

Nine years on, that belief has held.

And, in these nine years, we’ve stayed true to our mission. We’ve been asking the follow-up questions, going beyond the headlines and explaining what’s actually happening. We’ve travelled across the country to bring you in-depth, visually-compelling stories from the ground.

It’s been nine years of readers choosing to make this possible. If you’d like to be one of them:

Support ThePrint

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular