Washington: The United States defence department on Friday said it was “not aware” of any investigation that was conducted to ascertain if Pakistan had lost an F-16 in a dogfight with Indian fighter jets on February 27, contrary to a report by a news publication that had gone on to say, citing unidentified defence officials, the count revealed none was missing.
Foreign Policy magazine reported Thursday that US defence personnel conducted recently a physical count of Pakistan’s F-16s and found all in tact, none missing. It attributed the finding to two unidentified senior US defence officials and said the count was conducted at the invitation of Pakistan..
A US defence department spokesman told Hindustan Times in a statement that they, the department, “weren’t aware of any investigation like that”, that was said to have been conducted, according to unidentified defence officials cited in the FP report, and referred this reporter to the Department of State.
The state department distanced itself from the news report saying in response to a direct request to confirm or deny it, “As a matter of policy, the Department does not publicly comment on details of government-to-government agreements on end-use monitoring of US-origin defence articles.”
And it went on to reiterate its stated policy on Pakistan: “It is important to note that since January 2018, the United States government has suspended security assistance to Pakistan.”
Also read: Radio intercepts, parachute sightings, e-signatures: IAF sure it shot down Pakistani F-16
US government’s position appears to be in line with India, which in the backdrop of the attack, has reaffirmed its account of the downing of the Pakistani F-16, citing “electronic signature” as evidence. “During the aerial engagement that followed, one MiG 21 Bison of the IAF shot down one F-16,” Air Vice Marshal RGV Kapoor said Friday, “The Indian Forces have confirmed ejections at two different places on that day. These were separated by at least 8-10 kms. One was an IAF MiG 21 Bison and the other a PAF aircraft.”
India had scrambled its fighter jets to respond to a Pakistan air force intrusion into Indian airspace on February 27. Wing Commander Abhinandan Varthaman, who was flying a MiG 21 Bison, got a lock on a PAF F-16 and shot it before his own aircraft was hit, forcing him to bail, according to Indian officials.
The wing commander landed in Pakistan and was captured by Pakistan’s armed forces. Pakistani aircraft, on the other hand, fell in Pakistan, India has said and circulated pictures of one of its pilots and it has also said it knew the pilot’s name.
India has also complained to the United States that Pakistan used American-supplied F-16s in the attack in a possible infraction of the memorandum of sale of the aircraft, and handed over evidence, pieces of an AMRAAM (advanced medium range air-to-air missile) that Pakistani fighter jets had used in the dogfight — no other Pakistani air-force aircraft can fire these missiles.
The United States routinely inspects defence equipment sold by its companies to foreign countries, as part of their respective end-use agreements. Pakistan, for instance, is prohibited from flying F-16s out of the country without notifying the United States in advance, according to sale agreement.
Foreign policy magazine cited a senior US defence official to say the physical count was conducted at the invitation of Pakistan. And it took a while because not all aircraft were immediately available for inspection due to the conflict.
The report went on to quote an unidentified senior defense official, “all aircraft were present and accounted for”. It cited a second official, who knew of the count, to say no Pakistani F-16s were missing.
The count included F-16s that Pakistan had acquired from Jordan under third-party transfer the report said, adding that they were subject to the same end-user agreement and its rules.
Also read: India rubbishes claim by US magazine that no Pakistani F-16s are missing
By special arrangement with
Let Pakis remain in their dream. For us, they do not matter. For them, Pakistan exists for thousands of years, it was not part of India, they all are descendants of Arabs, they did not loose any of the wars with India, Bangladesh is still East Pakistan, They are far ahead of India Economically and technologically and so on. We know and they know the Truth of Feb. 26-27. We are proud of Abhi and IAF. Let us be generous and allow them to hide their faces by telling lies after lies to the whole world.
US did not fully confirm or deny the the total F16’s with PAK airforce after IAF claimed it shot down PAK F16.
Good. Now disable all planes and make count zero
What an unfortunate episode !!
Its ok for a political govt to lie to public for keeping morale and ratings. But a professional AVM lying on record, showing AMRAAM piece recovered from downed Su-30 and then negating it. How could IAF get its hands on AMRAAM pieces from Bison that fell in Pak area?
I really feel sorry to have shared the same profession as that of Mr. Kapoor
Pity : A serving AVM was not enough to lie in front of global media, that a retd Army Col jumped on the fairyland band wagon of day dreamers.
Pity the nation whose leaders build their egos on false foundations….
This article doesnt understand that the Defence Dept. would not be officially informed of the count as it is the state dept. which handles sale of weapons between countries and verifies whether the buying country has met its obligations . It is for this reason the Def Official asked the reporter to meet the state dept which refused to divulge any information. The jury is still out on this issie.
Hahaha….poor Indians are still reeling from the effects of pakistan retaliation on 27th morning and preposterously continue to claim which even wg Cdr Abhi denies. What humiliated military indeed with honour
Yup that’s sitings we’re indeed of two pilots from SU 30 shot down which iAF is trying hard to hide. time to come out with the truth.
why pro govt headline, when actually the spokesperson said he is not aware and they don’t comment on govt to govt contracts
Comments are closed.