US Congress wants Larry Page, CEO of Alphabet Inc. to testify in front of the intelligence committee which will include the chiefs of Twitter and Facebook as well.
For all their colonial underpinnings, postcards from Hyderabad also inadvertently preserve a trace of local memory: a glimpse of a street, a face, a forgotten name.
Indian toymakers are now exploring new markets, but they want govt to negotiate a trade deal with US soon, introduce incentives and subsidies to make the industry more competitive.
The project is meant to be a ‘protective shield that will keep expanding’, the PM said. It is on the lines of the ‘Golden Dome’ announced by Trump, it is learnt.
Now that both IAF and PAF have made formal claims of having shot down the other’s aircraft in the 87-hour war in May, we can ask a larger question: do such numbers really matter?
She has done intentionally provoke to a particular passenger on-board and off-board. This provocation would have led to fight inside but other lady took right step slapping FIR against her and it was good lesson that she would behave properly in future. Freedom of Expression does not mean that a particular person should be targeted inside the flight criticizing her association with a party.
In all law enforcement, there is an element of common sense, sound judgment, balance, proportionality that needs to come into play. In a judicial system clogged with 33 million cases, why add one more over a young lady expressing a strong political point of view ? She did nothing that would endanger the safety of flight operations. To be fair, neither did Shri Ravindra Gaikwad, MP, but hitting a sixty year old public servant twenty five times with one’s slippers would be a crime even outside the sanitised space of an aircraft.
An aircraft is a confined space and moment you bring subjective behavior into play, bad things happen. She made a mistake and must pay for it. Imagine if the roles were reversed. Try pulling the same stunt on a US or European Airline. Learn to call a spade a spade.
Very informative……thanks.
She has done intentionally provoke to a particular passenger on-board and off-board. This provocation would have led to fight inside but other lady took right step slapping FIR against her and it was good lesson that she would behave properly in future. Freedom of Expression does not mean that a particular person should be targeted inside the flight criticizing her association with a party.
In all law enforcement, there is an element of common sense, sound judgment, balance, proportionality that needs to come into play. In a judicial system clogged with 33 million cases, why add one more over a young lady expressing a strong political point of view ? She did nothing that would endanger the safety of flight operations. To be fair, neither did Shri Ravindra Gaikwad, MP, but hitting a sixty year old public servant twenty five times with one’s slippers would be a crime even outside the sanitised space of an aircraft.
An aircraft is a confined space and moment you bring subjective behavior into play, bad things happen. She made a mistake and must pay for it. Imagine if the roles were reversed. Try pulling the same stunt on a US or European Airline. Learn to call a spade a spade.