scorecardresearch
Friday, March 29, 2024
Support Our Journalism
HomeIndiaGovernanceGoogle could be in trouble as US Congress rejects low-level testimonials on...

Google could be in trouble as US Congress rejects low-level testimonials on election meddling

Follow Us :
Text Size:

US Congress wants Larry Page, CEO of Alphabet Inc. to testify in front of the intelligence committee which will include the chiefs of Twitter and Facebook as well.

Washington: Alphabet Inc.’s Google posted what it called “testimony” for a congressional hearing on social media companies’ efforts to thwart election meddling in advance of November’s midterm races – only it doesn’t appear anyone will be there to deliver it.

The Senate Intelligence Committee has said it rejected Google Chief Legal Officer Kent Walker as a witness because he wasn’t high-level enough to testify at a hearing Wednesday that will include Twitter Inc. Chief Executive Officer Jack Dorsey and Facebook Inc. Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg.

Walker’s prepared testimony lists the four new types of disclosure the company promised concerning election advertising in his last congressional appearance in the fall of 2017. Those include databases listing election ads on Google Search, YouTube and across the web, as well as a verification program and disclosures on political ads.

Google has insisted that Alphabet CEO Larry Page and Google CEO Sundar Pichai wouldn’t be the best officials to appear despite the Intelligence committee’s desire to hear from top decision-makers.

Senator Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, said in a tweet Tuesday that Dorsey and Sandberg will testify and “Larry Page should be there, too. It’s not too late for @Google to step up.”

Mark Warner @MarkWarner Tomorrow the Senate Intelligence Committee will hold an important hearing on the social media companies’ responses to foreign influence operations. @jack will be there. @sherylsandberg will be there. Larry Page should be there, too. It’s not too late for @Google to step up.

Warner also criticised a letter Pichai sent to several senators last week explaining why the company can’t answer detailed questions about its plans to return to China.

“Any effort to get back into China could enable the Chinese government in repressing and manipulating their citizens,” Warner said in a statement on Tuesday. “Google owes the public some answers about its reported plans.”

In his 31 August letter, Pichai wrote that “Google’s tools could help to facilitate an exchange of information and learning that would have broad benefits inside and outside of China.” However, the CEO said it was “unclear” whether the company would or could release a search service in China.

“Should we have something to announce in the future, we would be more than happy to brief you and your staff on those plans,” the letter concluded.

For Wednesday’s hearings, the likely outcome of the sparring is a stalemate – and Google testimony that no one will deliver. Lawmakers from both sides of the aisle have increased pressure on technology companies on Russian interference in the 2016 presidential campaign and other election meddling as well as issues including alleged anti-conservative bias and antitrust questions.

Google said in a statement that Walker will be in Washington on Wednesday, “where he will deliver written testimony, brief members of Congress on our work, and answer any questions they have.”

“We had informed the Senate Intelligence Committee of this in late July and had understood that he would be an appropriate witness for this hearing,” Google said.

In her prepared testimony for the Intelligence Committee, Sandberg highlighted efforts by Facebook to prevent election interference, including the use of artificial intelligence to detect “bad content” and “bad actors,” removing fake accounts and implementing stricter policies for advertising.

“We were too slow to spot this and too slow to act,” Sandberg said of Facebook’s performance in 2016. “That’s on us. This interference was completely unacceptable. It violated the values of our company and of the country we love.”

On Tuesday, the Washington Post published a guest column by Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg in which he highlighted some of the same points as Sandberg’s testimony and stressed cooperation with law enforcement and government. “It’s an arms race, and it will take the combined forces of the United States private and public sectors to protect America’s democracy from outside interference,” he wrote.

In prepared testimony for a hearing later Wednesday of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, Twitter’s Dorsey emphasized his company’s role as a“global town square” and the importance of a diversity of voices.

“We know the way to earn more trust around how we make decisions on our platform is to be as transparent as possible,” Dorsey said. He said the “Twitter platform itself does not take sides,” even as President Donald Trump and some Republicans are asserting a bias against conservatives on social media platforms.

Dorsey said Twitter’s data scientists did a study of all tweets sent by House and Senate members for the 30 days ending 13 August. While Democrats on average sent more tweets and had more active followers, after adjusting for that, he said, “ a single tweet by a Republican will be viewed as many times as a single tweet by a Democrat, even after all filtering and algorithms have been applied by Twitter.”

In Walker’s testimony, the Google lawyer also focuses on security measures that the company rolled out in the past year, such as a tool to prevent email phishing scams and a program, from the Alphabet unit Jigsaw, to protect political campaigns from adversarial cyber-attacks.

Walker has assumed increasing responsibility at Google, where the lawyer oversees the company’s sprawling legal and policy efforts. Earlier this summer, Google promoted Walker to oversee a larger portfolio, including the units that monitor security and abuse on its services, what Google calls “trust and safety.”

Walker’s ascent came under the tenure of CEO Pichai, who has focused more on Google products and shied away from addressing political issues. Eric Schmidt, Google’s former CEO and chairman, was far more willing to be the company’s political ambassador. He previously testified before the committee. Schmidt stepped down from his role as chair of Google parent Alphabet last year.- Bloomberg

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube, Telegram & WhatsApp

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular