Medical team at work in the Embassy at Rome, collecting samples of Indian nationals for testing COVID-19 | PTI
Medical team at work in the Embassy at Rome, collecting samples of Indian nationals for testing COVID-19 | PTI
Text Size:

New Delhi: Two Italian researchers have painted a bleak outlook for the European country, which finds itself at the centre of the coronavirus pandemic with over 1,400 deaths, if infections continue at the current rate for another week.

Over 21,000 people have been diagnosed with coronavirus in Italy, with the epicentre of the pandemic shifting from point-of-origin China to Europe.

In a piece published in the medical journal The Lancet Friday, titled “COVID -19 and Italy: What Next?”, the researchers predicted a rise of 9,000 patients by Sunday if the trend wasn’t arrested.

“If the increase in the number of infected patients follows this trend for the next week, there will be more than 30,000 patients infected by March 15,” the researchers said.

They also noted that Italy might need as many as 4,000 new ICUs by mid-April to tackle new infections, pointing out that 9 per cent to 11 per cent of patients in Italy had required ICU admissions daily between 1 March and 11 March.

According to the analysis, Italy currently has close to 5,200 ICUs.

The analysis, written by professors Andrea Remuzzi and Giuseppe Remuzzi, suggested that the trend of infections in Italy was similar to that reported for the initial phase of the infection in the city of Wuhan, China, where coronavirus originated.

We are deeply grateful to our readers & viewers for their time, trust and subscriptions.

Quality journalism is expensive and needs readers to pay for it. Your support will define our work and ThePrint’s future.

SUBSCRIBE NOW

In the worst-hit Lombardy region, despite extraordinary efforts to restrict the movement of people, the country is dealing with “an even greater fear — that the “number of patients who report to the emergency room will become much greater than the system can cope with”, the study noted.


Also Read: In its fight against coronavirus panic, Karnataka govt finds unlikely ally in Telegram app


 

Who to save and who not to

Italy has witnessed the second-highest number of coronavirus deaths and infections after China. The country has imposed strict social-distancing measures to restrict the infection amid the mounting toll, but a shortage of medical supplies and hospital beds in Italy is already reportedly forcing doctors to choose which coronavirus patients to save.

The ones with better odds of survival, for example, the young, are being treated while those with a dull chance are reportedly being denied life-saving care.

The two Italian researchers noted the trend too, pointing out that “this attitude has already been criticised by the current President of the Italian Comitato di Bioetica (Italian Bioethics Committee) who, in a recent declaration… stated that the Constitution recognises the right of every individual to receive all necessary healthcare”.

In the same breath, they also noted that such critics may not “recognise that the reality is that intensive care wards are overflowing with patients and that COVID-19 is not a benign disease”.

“Our doctors and nurses are modern heroes in an unexpected war against a difficult enemy. In the near future, they will have no choice. They will have to follow the same rules that healthcare workers are left with in conflict and disaster zones,” they added.

According to the researchers, healthcare professionals who form the frontline of the struggle against this pandemic haven’t been unaffected either — around 20 per cent are believed to have contacted the infection, with some even dying.

The researchers said that the number of newly infected patients in Italy could start to decrease within 3-4 days, departing from the exponential trend, “if the Italian outbreak follows a similar trend as in Hubei province (where Wuhan is located), China”.

However, they added that “this cannot currently be predicted because of differences between social distancing measures and the capacity to quickly build dedicated facilities in China”.


Also Read: How coronavirus spread in India — 39 of the first 50 patients came from Italy, Iran, China


 

How can Italy check the outbreak? 

The objective of the analysis is to help political leaders and health authorities allocate enough resources, including personnel, beds, and intensive care facilities, to manage the situation in the next few days and weeks.

“Our analysis tends to suggest that measures to reduce transmission should certainly be implemented, as our government did on March 9, by inhibiting people’s movement and social activities, unless strictly required,” the researchers said.

Rather than revising the Schengen visa-free zone, they added, the most effective way to contain this viral outbreak in European countries is “probably to avoid close contact at the individual level and social meetings in each country”.

They noted that the government was preparing to “pass legislation that will enable the health service to hire 20,000 more doctors and nurses and to provide 5,000 more ventilators to Italian hospitals”, but call for urgency. “These measures are a step in the right direction, but our model tells us that they need to be implemented urgently, in a matter of days. Otherwise, a substantial number of unnecessary deaths will become inevitable.”


Also Read: COVID-19 a ‘boomer remover’ — Why millennials are angry and done with older generation


 

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

News media is in a crisis & only you can fix it

You are reading this because you value good, intelligent and objective journalism. We thank you for your time and your trust.

You also know that the news media is facing an unprecedented crisis. It is likely that you are also hearing of the brutal layoffs and pay-cuts hitting the industry. There are many reasons why the media’s economics is broken. But a big one is that good people are not yet paying enough for good journalism.

We have a newsroom filled with talented young reporters. We also have the country’s most robust editing and fact-checking team, finest news photographers and video professionals. We are building India’s most ambitious and energetic news platform. And we aren’t even three yet.

At ThePrint, we invest in quality journalists. We pay them fairly and on time even in this difficult period. As you may have noticed, we do not flinch from spending whatever it takes to make sure our reporters reach where the story is. Our stellar coronavirus coverage is a good example. You can check some of it here.

This comes with a sizable cost. For us to continue bringing quality journalism, we need readers like you to pay for it. Because the advertising market is broken too.

If you think we deserve your support, do join us in this endeavour to strengthen fair, free, courageous, and questioning journalism, please click on the link below. Your support will define our journalism, and ThePrint’s future. It will take just a few seconds of your time.

Support Our Journalism

3 Comments Share Your Views

3 COMMENTS

  1. “Why doctors in Italy are letting some coronavirus patients die to save others”
    This is simply not true.
    The article intentionally confuses a contingency plan (the triage guidelines) with an actual occurrence. And this rumor that Italy is letting its patients die and is spreading like wildifire in the news.
    Yes, this could happen because of the virus progression curve. Indeed, the country went into lock down to “flatten the curve” and avoid the collapse of the healthcare system.
    But Italy is not at the point yet. And if Italy avoids to get to that point, it will be thanks to the Italian (public) healthcare system, which provided widely available testing already in February, so that the authority could track the progression of the infection and take the extreme measures of forcing the entire population at home when the statistics showed the risk ahead of us.
    Please take note of those facts in your reporting. The Italian experience is actually a positive example of response to a crisis, an example for the rest of the world .

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here