New Delhi: As part of a new database called ‘Covid Tracing Tracker’, the MIT Technology Review has given India’s Aarogya Setu app two out of five points. The review is based on an index developed to track and assess various contact tracing apps that are backed by governments across the world.
The database asks five basic questions — is it voluntary, will data be destroyed after a period of time, are there limitations on how the data gets used, is data collection minimised and is the effort transparent. If after review, the answer is yes, an app gets a star. If the answer is negative, or cannot be answered due to lack of information, the rating is left blank.
The review gave Aarogya Setu points only for useful data and deleting this data on time. The Indian app lost out on parameters related to voluntary use, limitations on data usage, and transparency. The tracker also noted that India was the “only democracy making its app mandatory for millions of people”.
Launched in early April, Aarogya Setu has so far been downloaded in nearly 10 crore smartphones.
While India’s official policy claims that downloading the app is voluntary, there have been several strong directives by the government to download it. If the home ministry had directed private employers to ensure that a 100 per cent of their staff should download the app, the Uttar Pradesh government has said that people could face a fine or jail term if found without the app on their phones.
The app has also come under fire from Opposition leaders and internet freedom activists. Congress leader Rahul Gandhi had flagged concerns about data security while downloading it. French ethical hacker Elliot Alderson also took on the government and claimed that the app could easily be hacked into. He even demonstrated several loopholes in the app’s security system.
We are deeply grateful to our readers & viewers for their time, trust and subscriptions.
Quality journalism is expensive and needs readers to pay for it. Your support will define our work and ThePrint’s future.
Many apps found to be ‘pervasive and invasive’
The publication, that was founded at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in 1899, has said that technologists across the world have been quick to build apps, services and systems for contact tracing in order to identify all those who come in contact with a carrier of the novel coronavirus.
But many of these apps were found to be “lightweight and temporary”, while some “pervasive and invasive”, it noted. The review also gave an example of the contact tracing app in China that “sucks up data including citizens’ identity, location, and even online payment history so that local police can watch for those who break quarantine rules”.
Out of the 25 apps the database has documented and reviewed so far, some of the others include include Australia’s COVIDSafe, the Chinese health code system, France’s StopCovid and the Germany Corona App.
The review also said how these apps affect societies need to be questioned. “How many people will download and use them, and how widely used do they have to be in order to succeed? What data will they collect, and who is it shared with? How will that information be used in the future? Are there policies in place to prevent abuse?” it asked.
During the process of comparing different apps, it was found that there was no standard approach being employed by developers and policymakers. Citizens in different countries were witnessing very different levels of surveillance and transparency.
The database is hence meant to be an effort to document and evaluate the different contact tracing efforts being undertaken by everyone, from small groups of coders, to big corporations like Apple and Google.
News media is in a crisis & only you can fix it
You are reading this because you value good, intelligent and objective journalism. We thank you for your time and your trust.
You also know that the news media is facing an unprecedented crisis. It is likely that you are also hearing of the brutal layoffs and pay-cuts hitting the industry. There are many reasons why the media’s economics is broken. But a big one is that good people are not yet paying enough for good journalism.
We have a newsroom filled with talented young reporters. We also have the country’s most robust editing and fact-checking team, finest news photographers and video professionals. We are building India’s most ambitious and energetic news platform. And we aren’t even three yet.
At ThePrint, we invest in quality journalists. We pay them fairly and on time even in this difficult period. As you may have noticed, we do not flinch from spending whatever it takes to make sure our reporters reach where the story is. Our stellar coronavirus coverage is a good example. You can check some of it here.
This comes with a sizable cost. For us to continue bringing quality journalism, we need readers like you to pay for it. Because the advertising market is broken too.
If you think we deserve your support, do join us in this endeavour to strengthen fair, free, courageous, and questioning journalism, please click on the link below. Your support will define our journalism, and ThePrint’s future. It will take just a few seconds of your time.