Sunday, January 29, 2023
HomeThePrint ProfileWhy should I apologise? Have right to opinion, says BJP MLA in...

Why should I apologise? Have right to opinion, says BJP MLA in WSJ-Facebook controversy

Raja Singh says he has nothing to apologise for, insists that Facebook did act against him & asserts that the social media platform is neutral. 

Text Size:

Bengaluru: The two-time BJP MLA from Telangana, Tiger Raja Naval Singh Lodh, is no stranger to controversy. 

Known to dole out one inflammatory speech after another — from calling for Rohingyas to be shot to threatening to behead those who oppose the Ram Temple in Ayodhya — Singh has hogged headlines for all the wrong reasons. 

The MLA is now once again in the news, only this time he is garnering global attention. 

The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) piece, accusing Facebook India of favouring the BJP to protect its businesses in the country, pivots heavily on the social media giant’s actions, or inaction, against Singh. 

The report alleges that Facebook’s top public policy executive in the country, Ankhi Das, stepped in and ensured that Singh’s hate-speech posts were not censored. “The current and former Facebook employees said Ms. Das’s intervention on behalf of Mr. Singh is part of a broader pattern of favoritism by Facebook toward Mr. Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party and Hindu hard-liners,” the report said.

Singh, however, is defiant. “I have only expressed my views. Why should I apologise? I have the right to my opinion,” he told ThePrint over the phone. 

“I have said that Rohingya Muslims should be sent to their homes,” he added. “I am not against patriotic Muslims. I am against those who are eating here and speaking against Hindus; I will not tolerate them.” 

Facebook on 3 September said it had banned Raja Singh from its platform for “violating our policy prohibiting those that promote or engage in violence and hate from having a presence on our platform”. The social media giant’s decision came after facing weeks of blowback due to the WSJ article, which resulted in a parliamentary standing committee deposing Facebook India head, Ajit Mohan.

In conversation with ThePrint, the MLA disputed the WSJ piece, claiming that Facebook has acted against him. “My page was deleted in 2018 after a few people complained about it,” he claimed. “I had approached Facebook three to four times to restore my account but they have not done so. Several other people are operating pages in my name and posting content. What can I do?”  

He also objected to allegations that Facebook was favouring the BJP. “Facebook is a neutral social media platform. The opposition is only targeting the BJP and Facebook due to politics,” he said. “If (Asaduddin) Owaisi is present on Facebook and they are not censoring him, how can Facebook be helping the BJP?”  

Also read: Facebook’s Ankhi Das says facing death threats, files police complaint after WSJ report row

The BJP MLA with roots in the TDP

The 43-year-old Singh is a two-time MLA from Goshamahal constituency, a suburb in Hyderabad. He joined the BJP in 2013, before winning the assembly election, for the first time, in 2014. He retained his seat in 2018 (elections were called early in the state). 

Before his stint in the BJP, Singh was a little-known corporator of the Telugu Desam Party (TDP) in what was then undivided Andhra Pradesh. He claims to be “literate informally educated” in his election affidavit. 

Since joining the BJP, however, he has metamorphosed into a hardline Hindutva leader. 

His website describes him as being from a “simple but devoted Hindu family”; for the Hyderabad Police, however, he is a known history sheeter with a penchant for hate speech. 

According to police records, Singh has 43 cases lodged against him, a majority of which relate to hate speech. Charge sheets have been filed in 16 cases. 

Some 17 cases are related to promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion or race and disrupting harmony while another nine relate to malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings. 

Other FIRs include those for obstructing a public servant from discharging duties, criminal intimidation, rioting and even attempt to murder. 

Singh, however, insists that the cases are all “politically motivated”. 

I am the convener of a cow protection group; most of the cases are related to this,” he said. “I have repeatedly said that if anyone hurts a cow and eats beef, I will be the first to hurt them to protect the cow. What is the harm in protecting cows?” 

He was also unapologetic. “I have also said if anyone opposes the Ram Mandir, I will chop off their hands,” he said. “I am here to protect Hindus.” 

The hate-speech spreadsheet

Singh has a penchant for stirring up controversy with his provocative remarks. 

In December 2015, he threatened to create a “Dadri-like situation” — a reference to the Muslim man lynched in Uttar Pradesh on suspicion of carrying beef — after students of Osmania University in Hyderabad made plans to organise a beef festival on campus. 

“People are entitled to eat whatever they wish. But if they try to hurt religious sentiments, we will stop such acts,” he had said then. “I am warning them, there will be another Dadri-like situation in Telangana. We can give our lives and take lives too.”

In 2017, he called for the “beheading of those who oppose the Ram temple”, leading to tension in the state.  

In January this year, Singh reiterated his threat to kill the “Owaisi brothers” — AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi and his brother Akbaruddin Owaisi — and bring an end to all those who oppose the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and the National Register of Citizens (NRC). 

“What is the problem with CAA or NRC? It does not threaten Muslims of our country,” he had told ThePrint then. “It will actually cleanse the country of infiltrators and I will clear the ones supporting them.” 

Critics, however, say that much of Singh’s speeches are deliberately provocative and an attempt by him to stay relevant.  

The ruling Telangana Rashtra Samiti’s social media convenor Krishank M. told ThePrint that Singh is a ‘habitual offender’, who constantly tries to create headlines with his inflammatory remarks.

“He does not have any knowledge about subjects like Article 370, which his party implemented and when given time to speak about it in the assembly, he could not even express his views,” Krishank said. “He has very limited support in his constituency and he will lose that soon in the next election.”  

The state BJP, however, insists that he is just doing his job as an “MLA who is protecting his constituents”. 

“Most of the time, Raja Singh reacts to statements made either by the Owaisi brothers or AIMIM leaders. But his statements are seen in isolation,” the Telangana BJP spokesperson Krishna Sagar Rao told ThePrint.

“Singh should probably stop reacting to issues that are being thrown at him. But he as an MLA has the responsibility to safeguard his constituents from the threats and slander as they vote for him for that protection.” 

(The copy has been updated to include Facebook’s decision to ban on Raja Singh.)

Also read: Facebook takes on Apple over in-app purchases, says fee structure hurts small businesses


Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism


  1. Bwahahahahaha!

    Obviously, it’s designed to drag the barely-questioning( read barely critical-thinking) masses back to the those sturdy bubbleS.

    One should wonder.. Why, never before now: Has ‘The Network'( “IT Cell”/”WhatsApp® University”, et. al) has been at pains to clear the name of Facebook®’s India’s operations than ever before? After all.. In lockstep with the international RW, they were the pioneers to whine how tyrannical these “Big Tech” Corporates are becoming. And the germ of such grievances was were they were located, Silicon Valley, in “NoCal” or Northern part of the USA’s State of California.( An arguably “Leftist-mArXisT”* state whose economy surpasses that of many other countries, including but not limited to — the “Republic” of India. In fact, it’s said that its economy makes it stand in line with successful sovereign-states in and of itself — quite a bigger, another hole in the thesis of[ pro-Capitalism] RW who inevitably latch on to the “farmers of California” as the primal economy-drivers, their defense-shield.[ Yet a-gain, it’s a widespread Orthodox-presupposition that in agriculture, folks tend to be more Conservative than most of other occupations. Whether intensive-labour is the prerequisite, or not.] And once a-gain, it’s a ludicrous fallacy; a desperate, pitiful attempt at misdirection which is not supported by wholesome-data. Nevermind the fact those who bring up the[ supposedly-RW] “farmers” as the primal cogs-in-the-wheel indeed do treat them as such, unmaintained cogs who’re not that deserving of incentives and economic-backing BUT the predators, their Big Business clients[ do]. Unless.. ‘Course, it’s to help galvanise them to continue being one of the abusers of the ecosystem, our inescapable, irreplaceable environment. Shall I spell-out ‘why’?)

    This unprecedented, never-seen-before endorsement of Facebook®’s competence, mere months after the exposé of INC’s own dalliances with now-defunct Cambridge Analytica®

    BEFORE yet-another “gora”, Aaron Banks( no salutation!) appropriated our Swades[h]i mechanisms for excavating and delivering The Truth™ to the masses**, but alas.. The hopelessly-brainwashed masses by the cross-Atlantic “Urban nAXAl” professors and other elites, effectively convinced them: To shoot The Messenger!( 2 minutes in silence for Om Shānti***.)

    led them to denounce INC primarily, but number of them( I deter invoking the euphemistic ‘some’****) admixed Facebook®’s complicity for the sake of “nEuTRalItY”, recalling their past-grievances and concluding it as “vindication”.
    But if Ms Ankhi Das, being a “Bong” is indeed that close to the[ “Didi”‘s] TMC and in spite of greater number of evidences linking her to RSS-affiliated outfits( even if one discounts “guilt by association” owing to her [twin-]sister’s direct-links, even though yet-again.. Their..) to regurgitate the arguments with their rule*****, then why are they ( their compatriots) including but not limited to, “independent” opinion-leaders/-makers carrying water to defend an employer of somebody with “strong ties” to the of “Didi”, especially when a coveted RW( but apparently appropriating my long-abandoned worldview summarised as: “One country’s right-wing( particularly in an Occidental country) is left-wing for overseas”, it’s a LW instead) publication has clearly established her as somebody who exceeds her authority[ of her job-profile], even though I’m not sure how many of them have come across this factor( if at all) — then why so much of weight thrown behind defending that employer?
    And that too.. When this wasn’t noticeably( forget about ‘notably’) practiced ever before?
    And since I know that “commenting is free”, unhelped by the practical-pseudonymity granted to fellow commenters( not necessarily ‘readers’), I’m obligated to spell-out for “the man himself” here: Facebook® does have an impersonation policy which draws a clear-line with[ potential] “parody” accounts/IDs, so if Facebook® is as mechanically-“pRoFeSsIoNaL” as he implies: Then his team[ who has gone through the trouble of translating his communications], must’ve been proactive in reporting those accounts capitalising on his celebrity. To spell-out: No [advertiser-/user-]account on any of Facebook® Inc’s offerings, paid or obviously, for-free — required.
    Any receipts?

    *One of the international-equivalents of yet-another neologism, ‘Urban nAXAl’.
    **Riffing on A mega-TP( a principle, if you will) that: How every notable invention and innovation, had its seeds from either Vedās[ or Dharmashāstras] or Imperial-subjects( most-popularly-euphemised-as: colonised people) of subcontinental KINGdoms( read anachronistic-“Bhāratiyas”).
    ***Apparently, just like “Merry Christmas” for the audiences of erstwhile medical Dr Zākir Nāik: ‘R[est ]I[n ]P[eace]’ is a preposterous, self-hating expression for non-ians owing to “cOlOnIALiSm”. Or something like that.
    ****Formally defined as quite different to ‘few’, I understand. But other-than the fact that those being dealt with are proficient in perverting linguistics, “some” has started to sound increasingly-utopian. Like, as if the sociological-equivalent of theorising “the fate of this Planet” or something. “It’s all cyclical!” is as true as too far-sigh[t]ed( pun intended), I opine.
    *****Nevermind that the TMC also has a sizable “Hindutva℠ wing” since past few years and in fact, they’ve went as far as hiring workers from outfits like Bajrang Dal.

  2. Facebook has become too large and won’t listen to individuals who any grievances.Because of lots of money that Facebook has nobody dares them.

  3. What makes anyone think that the WSJ can never be wrong. I think that its Editorial Board is a bunch of snobs who want to impose their unbalanced opinions on the rest of the world.

  4. I hope this Facebook fiasco will prove to be an eyeopener for all those who are busy chasing PROFIT – – which means all the businessmen without exception. They will realize that SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY is equally important.

    • You think it is soooo simple. stakes are very very high “SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY”…gayi tel lene. Bhaiya ji this is the story of throne. After divide and rule the advanced version is hate and rule….

  5. Raja Singh may be right that 3 or 4 people are sending messages in his name. Obviously he is enjoying that.
    If he wanted to save his reputation , he would have asked FB to investigate these fake accounts long ago.
    Has he then instigated others to post messages on his behalf ?

    • Couldn’t Have Surmised It Better! 👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾 👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾
      Facebook® does have an impersonation policy which draws a clear-line with “parody” accounts, if Facebook® is as mechanically-professional as he claims: Then his team[ who has gone through the trouble of translating his communications], must’ve been proactive in reporting those accounts capitalising on his celebrity.

Comments are closed.

Most Popular