New Delhi: A Supreme Court bench led by Chief Justice of India S.A. Bobde Friday issued a notice to the central government on a petition to ban the use of video-conferencing app Zoom, claiming it breaches privacy and violates the Information Technology Act, 2000.
The notice has also been served to Zoom, and the court will next hear the matter after four weeks.
Petitioner Harsh Chugh, who has identified herself as a homemaker and remote worker (she takes online classes using the app) has asked for an appropriate legislation that fixes liability in case of a breach.
Chugh said Zoom poses a threat to the privacy of those using it, and as it does not have end-to-end encryption, also violates the IT Act and the Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguards for Interception, Monitoring and Decryption of Information) Rules, 2009.
“The penetration of offending software increasing with each day have pan India ramifications (sic),” reads Chugh’s petition. Being an online tutor, she asserted, she was concerned about the risk posed to her students and other users by the “offending software”.
Chugh’s petition also quotes Zoom CEO Eric Yuan’s public apology that accepted the app was “faulty” in terms of providing a secure environment digitally. This admission, Chugh contended, supports her concern over the application being against the norms of cyber security.
We are deeply grateful to our readers & viewers for their time, trust and subscriptions.
Quality journalism is expensive and needs readers to pay for it. Your support will define our work and ThePrint’s future.
“There is a need for a legislation to be put in place in order to effectuate a standard regulation to safeguard the rights of citizens as has been brought to light by various leaders across the world,” the petition states.
“It is important to realise how Zoom consistently violates its duty to implement and maintain reasonable security practices, and misleads consumers about the security benefits of the product. Zoom has targeted consumers, businesses, and schools,” it says.
Chugh alleged Zoom violates privacy by misusing and exploiting personal information, and falsely, deceptively, and misleadingly advertising fictitious security benefits of the programme.
The petition also pointed out that digital hearings by some high courts have taken place on Zoom, and these could have been easily accessible by anyone and everyone. She further mentioned a public advisory issued by the Cyber Coordination Committee on how the app is “unsafe”.
News media is in a crisis & only you can fix it
You are reading this because you value good, intelligent and objective journalism. We thank you for your time and your trust.
You also know that the news media is facing an unprecedented crisis. It is likely that you are also hearing of the brutal layoffs and pay-cuts hitting the industry. There are many reasons why the media’s economics is broken. But a big one is that good people are not yet paying enough for good journalism.
We have a newsroom filled with talented young reporters. We also have the country’s most robust editing and fact-checking team, finest news photographers and video professionals. We are building India’s most ambitious and energetic news platform. And we aren’t even three yet.
At ThePrint, we invest in quality journalists. We pay them fairly and on time even in this difficult period. As you may have noticed, we do not flinch from spending whatever it takes to make sure our reporters reach where the story is. Our stellar coronavirus coverage is a good example. You can check some of it here.
This comes with a sizable cost. For us to continue bringing quality journalism, we need readers like you to pay for it. Because the advertising market is broken too.
If you think we deserve your support, do join us in this endeavour to strengthen fair, free, courageous, and questioning journalism, please click on the link below. Your support will define our journalism, and ThePrint’s future. It will take just a few seconds of your time.