MoU was related to setting up data centres at Rs 13,500 crore investment. At UP Global Investors Summit 2023, VueNow founder was seen speaking in presence of senior govt officials.
Under the policy, influencers who post content on state’s social, administrative, religious, financial & cultural matters will receive paid ads from govt for up to Rs 8 lakh per month.
Ordinance will come into effect once it is approved by governor, set to become law after it is passed in assembly, following which the existing 1998 law will be repealed.
Guidelines include directives for process of selection of exam centres, selection of agencies for preparing question papers, transporting OMR sheets, preventing impersonation etc.
The rationale given by BJP in defence of such state action is that criminals derail the development of the state and with an atmosphere of terror, it is tough to attract investors, writes Nischai Vats.
School authorities are planning to use the loudspeakers in cultural programmes & rallies they have to organise as part of voter awareness campaigns and govt's pupil enrolment drive.
Hinting that singing of National Anthem might be made mandatory in MP madrasas too, state's home minister Narottam Mishra said National Anthem should be sung everywhere.
UP govt filed affidavit before Allahabad HC in response to pleas demanding repeal of state's Unlawful Conversion law. It defends the new law, saying Constitution abhors 'any form of forceful conversion'.
The methods of the welfarist reduce the productivity of human effort and thus affect the welfare of the invalids as well as of the able-bodied. This is a greater injustice, BS Sanyal wrote in 1957.
Regulator seeks feedback on allowing firms to repurchase shares via exchanges after tax changes, as markets reel from war-led selloff and foreign outflows.
China patiently invested capital, skill and technology in coal gasification. Unlike it, we won’t move from words to action. As crude prices decline, we lose interest.
The Print is so selective in it’s reporting. Despite a grossly biased and partisan reportage, it lays claim to unhyphenated journalism.
ThePrint’s recent reportage has cast aspersions on the quality of it’s journalism.
There is a detailed report on the Indore communal issue – simply because a Hindu is at fault while Muslims are the supposed victims of “shuddhikaran”.
Had it been the other way round, would The Print have reported it?
As an example, just the other day, in Govandi area of Mumbai, a Durga idol being carried to the pandal by the faithful was attacked by Muslims near a mosque and broken into pieces. Did The Print report that story? It could have, but it chose not to.
Such acts of omission and commission clearly show us what Mr. Shekhar Gupta means when he says “un-hyphenated journalism”.
Happy indeed that ThePrint has gone hammer and tongs at the “pure vegetarian” mindset during festivals. Such blanket bans are akin to Islamic fatwas. It causes great hardship to communities like the Assamese, Bengalis and others who consume meat/fish/eggs throughout the year irrespective of festivals and seasons.
But the thing here is one of principle and integrity. When was the last time The Print took such a stand against this idiotic and stupid concept called “fatwa”? I don’t think I can remember even one such instance.
The Print needs to introspect about it’s editorial policies and practices. For instance, Kolkata is flooded and people are dying due to electrocution – but there is not a single editorial take or even a detailed news article on this. If West Bengal had been a BJP ruled state, The Print would have hauled the state government over the coals.
Notwithstanding Mr. Shekhar Gupta’s oft-repeated claims of unhyphenated journalism, the deep-rooted bias is there for all to see.
The Print is so selective in it’s reporting. Despite a grossly biased and partisan reportage, it lays claim to unhyphenated journalism.
ThePrint’s recent reportage has cast aspersions on the quality of it’s journalism.
There is a detailed report on the Indore communal issue – simply because a Hindu is at fault while Muslims are the supposed victims of “shuddhikaran”.
Had it been the other way round, would The Print have reported it?
As an example, just the other day, in Govandi area of Mumbai, a Durga idol being carried to the pandal by the faithful was attacked by Muslims near a mosque and broken into pieces. Did The Print report that story? It could have, but it chose not to.
Such acts of omission and commission clearly show us what Mr. Shekhar Gupta means when he says “un-hyphenated journalism”.
Happy indeed that ThePrint has gone hammer and tongs at the “pure vegetarian” mindset during festivals. Such blanket bans are akin to Islamic fatwas. It causes great hardship to communities like the Assamese, Bengalis and others who consume meat/fish/eggs throughout the year irrespective of festivals and seasons.
But the thing here is one of principle and integrity. When was the last time The Print took such a stand against this idiotic and stupid concept called “fatwa”? I don’t think I can remember even one such instance.
The Print needs to introspect about it’s editorial policies and practices. For instance, Kolkata is flooded and people are dying due to electrocution – but there is not a single editorial take or even a detailed news article on this. If West Bengal had been a BJP ruled state, The Print would have hauled the state government over the coals.
Notwithstanding Mr. Shekhar Gupta’s oft-repeated claims of unhyphenated journalism, the deep-rooted bias is there for all to see.