At least seven people have come forward claiming to be descendants of Lord Ram ever since Supreme Court asked if any Raghuvanshi was living in Ayodhya.
Xi won’t be walking away from Europe with a win in hand, but his visit will almost certainly ignite arguments about the continent’s geopolitical future.
Air India’s new policy, effective from 2 May, introduces new weight limits for tickets in each of the different 'fare families' — Comfort, Comfort Plus, and Flex.
A theme has not yet emerged for BJP & people see lack of a contest, which makes it unexciting. For all these reasons, 2024 is turning out to be an unexpectedly theme-less election.
A very thought provoking article indeed. The dichotomy in India’s society is indeed more notable than many other cultures, and this is particularly true for the English medium layer in our society. Many times I have engaged in the argument with close friends about the negative impact of British Raj. The response has mostly pointed towards consequences if debauched monarchies had continued to rule the subcontinent. The unfortunate part of this journey is that we are still using what was handed to us, and NOT reformed to a large extent in a progressive manner, whether Dhartiputra way or Macaulayputra way. in fact we have regressed. For instance, now we have many viceroys (accountable to no one while living on lavish perks). The power distance is feudal, with common man shown their place lest they dare question those in authority (look at Yogi with his commandos walking besides him). Ram Rajya only in name; in reality it is mai-baap and jiski lathi uski bhains.
Extremely interesting and thought-provoking piece has been penned down by the author. We must have a national program which makes all Indians better rather than some Indians at the throat of other Indians.
There was a serial called ‘Akhand Ramayan’ on Doordarshan ,which invariably used to put me to sleep. But this article is interesting , reading it some queries jumped to mind. For eg what were the geographical boundaries of Ramrajya? Or what would lord ram think about dalits ?Or what should erstwhile citizens of Ramrajya now settled in foreign shores like us and uk do?
A very thought provoking article indeed. The dichotomy in India’s society is indeed more notable than many other cultures, and this is particularly true for the English medium layer in our society. Many times I have engaged in the argument with close friends about the negative impact of British Raj. The response has mostly pointed towards consequences if debauched monarchies had continued to rule the subcontinent. The unfortunate part of this journey is that we are still using what was handed to us, and NOT reformed to a large extent in a progressive manner, whether Dhartiputra way or Macaulayputra way. in fact we have regressed. For instance, now we have many viceroys (accountable to no one while living on lavish perks). The power distance is feudal, with common man shown their place lest they dare question those in authority (look at Yogi with his commandos walking besides him). Ram Rajya only in name; in reality it is mai-baap and jiski lathi uski bhains.
Hindu literature has no strength as Hindu history.
Extremely interesting and thought-provoking piece has been penned down by the author. We must have a national program which makes all Indians better rather than some Indians at the throat of other Indians.
Ruling elite in India was always the same Macaulayputra kind of terms are political and used to hoodwink subalterns and lumpens.
There was a serial called ‘Akhand Ramayan’ on Doordarshan ,which invariably used to put me to sleep. But this article is interesting , reading it some queries jumped to mind. For eg what were the geographical boundaries of Ramrajya? Or what would lord ram think about dalits ?Or what should erstwhile citizens of Ramrajya now settled in foreign shores like us and uk do?
Lord Ram would not have wanted his subjects to go to bed hungry, as many Indians still do.