Bringing in the government whenever something goes wrong is a bad solution, and not in tune with the basic idea that religious affairs are not the business of the state.
Nepal called itself ‘world’s only Hindu kingdom’ for much of the previous century. However, for most of history, the country was religiously, politically, and ethnically fragmented.
A police officer said he tried to convince Pinky Chaudhary that the people living in the slum were not Bangladeshis. But the HRD Hindu Raksha Dal chief refused to listen.
Survey by Lokniti-CSDS also found that more young people than old support religious pluralism, and over half of Hindu respondents believe Ram Mandir will help consolidate Hindu identity.
The new political Hindu order being established by BJP-RSS is a continuum of some sort of reform in Hindu society. Caste and hierarchy remain, but no overt exclusion is practised.
Ram temple has transformed India in its entirety. From party politics to cultural warfare, India or Bharat is undeniably Hindu today. Pluralism is just a colourful backdrop.
Hindutva needs several signposts and intermediate goalposts before we start believing that our Hindu identity is more important than the interests of our immediate social group.
Speaking at annual Vijayadashami event, RSS chief says Sangh organises Hindu society to protect 'dharma, sanskriti and samaj'. He also emphasises goal of 'Akhand Bharat'.
Street gangs are building a Hindu nationalist state with low-grade, everyday terrorism. Earlier phases of communal violence at least didn't undermine the authority of institutions.
A look at the latest data from the Ministry of Commerce & Industry shows imports rising faster than exports, as Indian firms continue to rely on Chinese components for manufacturing.
ThePrint has learnt that more than one women fighter pilots were involved in targeting military locations during the 87-hour conflict with Pakistan last year.
Forty years ago this week, ‘Khalistan Commando Force’ assassins were closing in on Gen Vaidya. So callous was the security of the just-retired Army chief that he was given a solitary police gunman
For eons, Hindu civilization is what defined Bharat. The fight for independence from British was accomplished not because we have had a constitution. It was the innate sense of freedom built into Hindu civilization. Ashok doesn’t cognize that…it is his failure. My sympathies.
The fact is temples and state need to be separated. The fact is Bharat is being forced to conform to western constructs of secularism of “church” and state.
Bharat’s history is evident that temples did not run the state but they are not secular places either to be controlled by state.
Anyhow, Mr.ashok, why do you remain oblivious when the same state does not control the Abrahamic places of worship? Did your secularism become take a vacation then?
Absolutely correct!!
Congress always wants excuse for govt involvement in every walk of life, esp if it is Hindu institutions. Autonomy is only meant for non-Hindus, according to pseudo-seculars.
What we need is better standards and processes of temple governance, similar to corporate governance, with regular release of financial statements.
At this rate, Congress would ask nationalization of private companies, because some private companies fudge their balance sheets, while non-removable sarkari babus do corruption all the time.
Let me rephrase this, sir. India is NOT a Hindu Rashtra. It is a modern, secular Republic, governed by a written Constitution. So will defer to the columnist on the second part of the proposition. My vote always for a firewall between church and state.
Author is right
Ashok is wrong.
For eons, Hindu civilization is what defined Bharat. The fight for independence from British was accomplished not because we have had a constitution. It was the innate sense of freedom built into Hindu civilization. Ashok doesn’t cognize that…it is his failure. My sympathies.
The fact is temples and state need to be separated. The fact is Bharat is being forced to conform to western constructs of secularism of “church” and state.
Bharat’s history is evident that temples did not run the state but they are not secular places either to be controlled by state.
Anyhow, Mr.ashok, why do you remain oblivious when the same state does not control the Abrahamic places of worship? Did your secularism become take a vacation then?
Don’t be tongue tied.
Absolutely correct!!
Congress always wants excuse for govt involvement in every walk of life, esp if it is Hindu institutions. Autonomy is only meant for non-Hindus, according to pseudo-seculars.
What we need is better standards and processes of temple governance, similar to corporate governance, with regular release of financial statements.
At this rate, Congress would ask nationalization of private companies, because some private companies fudge their balance sheets, while non-removable sarkari babus do corruption all the time.
Let me rephrase this, sir. India is NOT a Hindu Rashtra. It is a modern, secular Republic, governed by a written Constitution. So will defer to the columnist on the second part of the proposition. My vote always for a firewall between church and state.