Indian-American Neera Tanden is facing a tough confirmation process with 4 senators saying they will vote against her in light of her past social media behaviour.
US Presidential debates are an entertaining opportunity for voters to learn about the candidates, see how likeable they are and learn about their politics on certain issues.
The report leaves no doubt that an extensive network of Russian operatives with intelligence ties worked with Trump’s operatives to torpedo Hillary Clinton’s campaign.
The probe finds that Putin ordered the release of emails intended to harm Hillary Clinton’s campaign. It also finds no evidence that Trump colluded with Moscow.
CNN reports that the Bill Clinton and George W. Bush portraits have been moved to a room that is largely used as a storage space for unused linen and furniture.
Rather than functioning as conventional propaganda, the video operates as a device for interpretation, subtly shaping expectations about future developments in China’s naval trajectory.
By pairing Indian drone engineering with Japanese semiconductor expertise, the two firms aim to develop more advanced autonomous systems tailored to both defence & commercial use.
American objectives are unmet. They neither have muscle nor motivation to resume the war. As for Iran, the regime didn’t just survive, it’s now led by more radical individuals.
Trash movie reviews by clueless Liber**nduu critic.
These idiots have spent their whole life orgasming over worthless-storyless ISI-loving chut*yaap like Pathaan-Panther-Tiger etc.
Probably Abbbu(ISI and Soros) se pressure aa raha hai, Aditya-Yami ka image spoil karna ka….ukhaad toh kuch sakte nhi, even this part 2 will be a blockbuster but Dream-on Shobbha ji ! LOL
None of what the blogger said about the actors and the characters stick. The piece does have ta somewhat weary, seen-it-all tone that doesn’t earn its cynicism
She goes after Dhurandhar disproportionately while often giving a pass to genuinely trashy Bollywood output from bigger, more established star camps. That kind of selective criticism reveals potential bias rather than principled film commentary. It raises the question — is she critiquing the film on merit, or is she critiquing the people behind it?
And there’s a reasonable basis for suspecting the latter, because:
A) Dhurandhar and its team represent a certain kind of nationalist, action-oriented cinema that she seems personally uncomfortable with
B) Aditya Dhar and Yami Gautam are not from the traditional Bollywood inner circle
C) The film’s success came somewhat outside the establishment approval machine
So her commentary reads less like genuine film criticism and more like establishment discomfort with outsiders doing well.
These award functions are dominated by nepo-babies. Why should Aditya Dhar seek validation from those who gave best newcomer award to Ananya Pandey?
Dhurandar made more than 1000 crore, and that’s a slab on these award-mongerers.
Trash movie reviews by clueless Liber**nduu critic.
These idiots have spent their whole life orgasming over worthless-storyless ISI-loving chut*yaap like Pathaan-Panther-Tiger etc.
Probably Abbbu(ISI and Soros) se pressure aa raha hai, Aditya-Yami ka image spoil karna ka….ukhaad toh kuch sakte nhi, even this part 2 will be a blockbuster but Dream-on Shobbha ji ! LOL
As biased as ever. Cannot live with reality.
None of what the blogger said about the actors and the characters stick. The piece does have ta somewhat weary, seen-it-all tone that doesn’t earn its cynicism
She goes after Dhurandhar disproportionately while often giving a pass to genuinely trashy Bollywood output from bigger, more established star camps. That kind of selective criticism reveals potential bias rather than principled film commentary. It raises the question — is she critiquing the film on merit, or is she critiquing the people behind it?
And there’s a reasonable basis for suspecting the latter, because:
A) Dhurandhar and its team represent a certain kind of nationalist, action-oriented cinema that she seems personally uncomfortable with
B) Aditya Dhar and Yami Gautam are not from the traditional Bollywood inner circle
C) The film’s success came somewhat outside the establishment approval machine
So her commentary reads less like genuine film criticism and more like establishment discomfort with outsiders doing well.
I wonder what the editorial motivation is.
These award functions are dominated by nepo-babies. Why should Aditya Dhar seek validation from those who gave best newcomer award to Ananya Pandey?
Dhurandar made more than 1000 crore, and that’s a slab on these award-mongerers.