Amitesh Banerjee is the son of U.C. Banerjee, a former Supreme Court judge whose report on Godhra train fire, that killed 58 karsevaks, ruled out foul play.
The Nanavati Commission's report on the 2002 Gujarat carnage, released Wednesday, also recommended restrictions on media coverage during communal riots.
Former IPS officers Sanjiv Bhatt, R.B. Sreekumar and Rahul Sharma had given statements against the then Narendra Modi-led Gujarat govt in the 2002 riots case.
Bilkis Bano, who was gang raped during the 2002 riots, earlier refused to accept a Rs 5 lakh offer and sought exemplary compensation from Gujarat govt.
BJP’s fate in the second phase of 2024 Lok Sabha election will be decided in Karnataka, Rajasthan, and Maharashtra, where it performed very well in 2019 but faces a stiff competition now.
The private lender's shares tumbled to be top Nifty 50 loser after India's central bank barred it from taking on new customers through online and mobile banking channels.
Another addition to military cooperation has been the Strategic Space Dialogue, inaugurated in Paris in 2023. Last month, India participated as an observer to France’s AsterX.
We, the ordinary people of India have little or no knowledge of appointment of Judges and Chief justices of High courts and supreme courts in India. That we only have the idea that Supreme court has its way when it is face to face with Govt. We also hear Politicians lamenting delays in justice that they say are denied but here and in some other cases we learn that Govt. do have its way and Supreme court laments. Why Supreme court cannot enforce its recommendations is not known. Are members of collagium who are the senior most justices and short period to retire scared that enforcing would incur displeasure of the Govt. and that would affect their after retirement benefits particularly plum political postings in jeopardy. Or else why the Chief Justice of India cannot issue orders to make appointment in certain time bound frame and if it has certain reservations that too should be sent withing the same time frame. But the appointment could not be deferred more than a month? Is Supreme court a lame duck?
Thankfully because of him and the Tehelka Magazine sting operation, we now know how the Modi government fabricated the facts of the Godhra train fire case.
We, the ordinary people of India have little or no knowledge of appointment of Judges and Chief justices of High courts and supreme courts in India. That we only have the idea that Supreme court has its way when it is face to face with Govt. We also hear Politicians lamenting delays in justice that they say are denied but here and in some other cases we learn that Govt. do have its way and Supreme court laments. Why Supreme court cannot enforce its recommendations is not known. Are members of collagium who are the senior most justices and short period to retire scared that enforcing would incur displeasure of the Govt. and that would affect their after retirement benefits particularly plum political postings in jeopardy. Or else why the Chief Justice of India cannot issue orders to make appointment in certain time bound frame and if it has certain reservations that too should be sent withing the same time frame. But the appointment could not be deferred more than a month? Is Supreme court a lame duck?
Blood line in appointments seems most important interesting it would be see who many have come down the family tree.
U.C.Benarjee deserves to be tried for judicial fraud and debarred. He is reason enough not to elevate his son to a position of responsibility.
Thankfully because of him and the Tehelka Magazine sting operation, we now know how the Modi government fabricated the facts of the Godhra train fire case.