South Africa’s apartheid regime was brutal on liberation movement. But while the British in India used force, they also had to give Congress a role in government.
A UNICEF study showed that on average, ODF village households accrued cumulative benefits of Rs 50,000 per year and their property value increased by Rs 19,000.
Removal of the Congress president from Jallianwala Bagh trust is part of a larger trend of the ruling party’s attempts to distort history and mythicise lies.
Uniformity of rules should be the playbook across sectors. Different rules, whether for telecom players, retail entities or online businesses, would invariably trigger the level-playing questions.
On 4 November 2025, NCLAT bench, comprising Chairperson Justice Ashok Bhushan and Member Arun Baroka, noted that WhatsApp and Meta are distinct legal entities.
This world is being restructured and redrawn by one man, and what’s his power? It’s not his formidable military. It’s trade. With China, it turned on him.
Revolutionary or Revulsive constitution….. As in comments before, the Equality has been killed by ordinance…..
It has been a copy of British !
As mentioned coercion and co-opting…. M.K. Gandhi was a planted Stooge of British who criticized the Africans ! The real victory of Independence was due to Revolutionary armed struggle…. Congress created charismatic Unity and this was to be disbanded later as per Gandhi and rest is History (mostly British)….. As for South Africa Mandela and Winnie were poles apart…. She being among the rooted Local population !
India’s Constitution was revolutionary for the time in which it was drafted. However, numerous constitutional amendments have gone against the principles on which the Indian Constitution was written. For instance, the addition of the words “secular” and “socialist” by the Indira Gandhi led government during the Emergency was totally unnecessary. India was never thought of as a socialist republic when the Constitution was drafted. Yes, India has largely been a secular country so far, but there must be some good reason why the founding fathers didn’t think it necessary to have the word “secular” added in the preamble.
Why parties are scared of removing this fake socialism and even more fake secularism?
Revolutionary constitution? Ok, i mistook it for third class two penny Socialist constitution. Or revolutionary third class two penny constitution is apt perhaps
Revolutionary or Revulsive constitution….. As in comments before, the Equality has been killed by ordinance…..
It has been a copy of British !
As mentioned coercion and co-opting…. M.K. Gandhi was a planted Stooge of British who criticized the Africans ! The real victory of Independence was due to Revolutionary armed struggle…. Congress created charismatic Unity and this was to be disbanded later as per Gandhi and rest is History (mostly British)….. As for South Africa Mandela and Winnie were poles apart…. She being among the rooted Local population !
India’s Constitution was revolutionary for the time in which it was drafted. However, numerous constitutional amendments have gone against the principles on which the Indian Constitution was written. For instance, the addition of the words “secular” and “socialist” by the Indira Gandhi led government during the Emergency was totally unnecessary. India was never thought of as a socialist republic when the Constitution was drafted. Yes, India has largely been a secular country so far, but there must be some good reason why the founding fathers didn’t think it necessary to have the word “secular” added in the preamble.
Why parties are scared of removing this fake socialism and even more fake secularism?
Revolutionary constitution? Ok, i mistook it for third class two penny Socialist constitution. Or revolutionary third class two penny constitution is apt perhaps