Bullet marks seen at Jallianwala Bagh | Flickr
Bullet marks at Jallianwala Bagh memorial | Flickr
Text Size:

Parliament dodged a bullet during the recently-concluded Budget session when the Rajya Sabha adjourned without taking up a bill that the PM Narendra Modi-led government had bulldozed through the Lok Sabha.

That cynical piece of legislation, sadly, was The Jallianwala Bagh National Memorial (Amendment) Bill, 2018, which ought to have commemorated the hundreds of innocent people brutally killed at Jallianwala Bagh on 13 April 1919.  The centenary of this national tragedy should have been an opportunity to bring a divided Parliament together in spirit of national unity. Instead, the Modi government chose to use the occasion to push a proposal of mind-boggling pettiness – to remove the president of the Indian National Congress from the trust that runs Jallianwala Bagh.

The BJP claims it is an anomaly that the leader of a specific political party should be given an assigned place in the trust. But as I argued in Parliament, the reasons are embedded in history. It was the Congress that launched an investigation in 1919 and revealed the truth about the massacre, which the British had tried to cover up. The party also undertook relief work to help thousands of families affected by this gruesome incident.

Also read: UK’s House of Lords is considering an apology for Jallianwala Bagh massacre

At its annual session at Amritsar in December 1919, presided by Motilal Nehru, the Congress decided that the party should acquire the Jallianwala Bagh in order to build a national memorial there. A resolution to this effect was moved by Madan Mohan Malaviya on 27 December with these words:

We have decided to raise the memorial not with any narrow motive. It is not to keep alive the dark deeds of General Dyer. We want it to be a Memorial to the Hindu-Muslim unity that had sprung out of the intermingling of Hindu and Muslim blood on that field of carnage.”

The Congress intended this monument to be a symbol of Hindu-Muslim unity, something which is increasingly under threat under the current dispensation. A special committee of the Congress with leaders like Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, Lala Lajpat Rai and others was appointed to acquire the land.  It was a difficult process because the British tried their best to obliterate any attempt to memorialise the massacre and tried to set up a cloth market on the site. Gandhiji’s appeal to the nation to donate funds to the Congress for this purpose raised nearly Rs 10 lakh in less than a year– an enormous sum of money in 1919, akin to Rs 10 crore today. The site was purchased by the Congress with the help of Sashti Charan Mukherjee and a trust was established to oversee the development and maintenance of the monument.

We are deeply grateful to our readers & viewers for their time, trust and subscriptions.

Quality journalism is expensive and needs readers to pay for it. Your support will define our work and ThePrint’s future.


By 1951, Jawaharlal Nehru was the last living member of the trust. This was when the Congress decided to establish a statutory trust to oversee the site. A draft Bill to establish the Jallianwala Bagh National Memorial Trust was approved by the Congress Working Committee in April 1950, and Dr B.R. Ambedkar moved the Bill in the Lok Sabha that month to convert the trust into a national statutory trust.

Ambedkar’s bill designated the president of the Indian National Congress as an ex-officio trustee. Nehru explained while participating in the debate on the bill, this reflected the intimate connection between the Congress and the memorial, and was not intended to imply that it was a party memorial.

Also read: It’s 100 years of Jallianwala Bagh, not that you would know if you were at the memorial

The issue came up again half a century later when the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Culture, under the chairmanship of senior CPI(M) leader Shri Nilotpal Basu on 11 November 2003 presented the 71st Report on the Jallianwala Bagh National Memorial. Para 3 of the report states:

The composition of the Jallianwala Bagh National Memorial Trust as prescribed in the parent Act was in order and the inclusion of the President of the Indian National Congress was in keeping with the contribution of the Indian National Congress in the freedom movement in general, and glorious struggle which led to the Jallianwala Bagh incident in particular.”

This was the level of bipartisanship that existed in our politics; even our political opponents were mature enough to recognise the role played by the Congress party in our freedom struggle. Today, the Modi government is trying to deny that history with a bill removing the Congress president from the trust his own party created for a site the Congress itself purchased.

What is the heritage of the ruling party, which is trying to deny the role of the Congress in establishing the memorial? The parent body of this party, the RSS as well as the Sangh Parivar, have a shameless past of genuflecting before the British. There are memos of the British Raj that state the Sangh kept itself within the colonial laws, collaborated with the authorities and refused to participate in the Quit India movement. It is richly ironic that the heirs to such an ideology now seek to deny the role of the Congress in our freedom struggle.

Also read: The BJP wants to rewrite history so that its politics can be all about ideology

The bill also empowers the central government to remove nominated trustees before the completion of their term, without assigning any reasons. In other words, the government can change nominated trustees for purely political reasons (which need not be disclosed) and pack this memorial that symbolises Hindu-Muslim unity with Hindutva ideologues and government stooges. We have seen this with the appointments made by the government to the Nehru Memorial Museum and Library, replacing trustees who opposed the attempts to dilute Nehru’s association with Teen Murti Bhavan. People associated with the RSS have been packed into the Indian Council of Historical Research.

The government’s failure to specify grounds due to which a nominated trustee can be removed, betrays their real intent in trying to throttle the autonomy of our country’s institutions. The bill is therefore merely an instrument in the ongoing infiltration of our institutions by people of a particular political persuasion.

The removal of the Congress president from the trust and the arrogation by the government of wide powers under this bill is part of a larger trend of the ruling party’s attempts to distort our history and to mythicise lies. We have seen this with the attempt to tinker with history books to erase references to Nehru, depicting religious minorities as foreigners, or removing signs of Muslim influence such as renaming Allahabad to Prayagraj and Urdu Bazaar to Hindi Bazaar. While the government makes these changes through executive actions, many of its supporters pursue these malicious objectives through fake news and bigotry on social media platforms.

This Modi government may try to erase our history; fill our institutions with Right-wing ideologues; neglect our sites of medieval heritage and take an axe to the history of our freedom movement. They can attempt to demolish the secular fabric of our country, but they will never succeed.

Pluralism is the heart and soul of India, one which the British could not suppress despite their deliberate policy of divide and rule. The Congress party’s place in building a pluralist and inclusive India cannot be destroyed through a misguided law by which the ruling party tries to rewrite history. The forthcoming 2019 Lok Sabha elections should bury this misconceived proposal for good.

Dr Shashi Tharoor is a Member of Parliament for Thiruvananthapuram and former MoS for External Affairs and HRD. He served the UN as an administrator and peacekeeper for three decades. He studied History at St. Stephen’s College, Delhi University and International Relations at Tufts University. Tharoor has authored 18 books, both fiction and non-fiction; his most recent book is The Paradoxical Prime Minister. Follow him on Twitter @ShashiTharoor.

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

News media is in a crisis & only you can fix it

You are reading this because you value good, intelligent and objective journalism. We thank you for your time and your trust.

You also know that the news media is facing an unprecedented crisis. It is likely that you are also hearing of the brutal layoffs and pay-cuts hitting the industry. There are many reasons why the media’s economics is broken. But a big one is that good people are not yet paying enough for good journalism.

We have a newsroom filled with talented young reporters. We also have the country’s most robust editing and fact-checking team, finest news photographers and video professionals. We are building India’s most ambitious and energetic news platform. And we aren’t even three yet.

At ThePrint, we invest in quality journalists. We pay them fairly and on time even in this difficult period. As you may have noticed, we do not flinch from spending whatever it takes to make sure our reporters reach where the story is. Our stellar coronavirus coverage is a good example. You can check some of it here.

This comes with a sizable cost. For us to continue bringing quality journalism, we need readers like you to pay for it. Because the advertising market is broken too.

If you think we deserve your support, do join us in this endeavour to strengthen fair, free, courageous, and questioning journalism, please click on the link below. Your support will define our journalism, and ThePrint’s future. It will take just a few seconds of your time.

Support Our Journalism

7 Comments Share Your Views


  1. Mr Tharoor, your opinion above mentions that in April 1950, Dr BR Ambedkar moves the bill in Lok Sabha and the Jalliawala trust was converted into National Statutory trust. Therefore, ex-officio trustee should be President of the ruling party, it can be BJP, Congress or any other party in power during that time. The Congress Party’s contribution to freedom struggle have been sufficiently rewarded with 49 years of rule. Change is the essence of life and in this context, an amendment in the Parent act is required.

    I understand difficult for Congress politician to comprehend, still entangled in monarchical system of their own making.

  2. Poor fellow is really trying very hard to somehow get into Raga’s notice for a plum post. But, every single thing has failed.

  3. Why only the president of a Trust, Shashi? Let’s make your boss the president for life of India! And why stop only for this Janam, shashi> Let’s make your employer the Emperor of India for eternity.
    How low can you stoop for a Ticket?

  4. I like the phrase “mind-boggling pettiness” that is ascribed to Modi government in this article. Well, if the leader of this government, Mr Modi himself could be described by any other epithet, his government on which he has a vice-like tight control couldn’t have won such a non-complimentary label.

    The aptness of this phrase has been demonstrated time and again in the past five years — in Modi government’s interference with Delhi government, for example; selection of FTII chairman, etc. The present Jalianwala Bagh case only once again demonstrates Mr Modi’s hatred for the Congress and his desperate wish to erase its name from the books of history. Mr Modi had come to power at the centre for the first time, and he has liked the power so much that he is willing to go to any length to ensure his stay there, as the recent incidents of Pulwama and its aftermath have indicated. And if his wish is fulfilled in the coming elections, tinkering and even rewriting of some chapters of history is a certainty. Let’s hope that does not happen!

  5. Entitlement!!! That is the problem!! The Congress believes that only a Gandhi, irrespective whether he is qualified, irrespective whether he or she can speak a sentence in any language without someone prompting and irrespective whether they truelly be Indian, can be the president of the party. And that now extends to all institutions of this country.

    The Congress stopped being the Congress which had played a significant role along with others like Subhash Chandra Bose in the freedom movement when MK Gandhi overruled the election which actually put forward Sardar Patel to be the first Prime Minister. Instead MK Gandhi nomimated Nehru over Sardar Patel. That was the end of the old congress.

    Now the congress is nothing but of the Gandhi’s, by the Gandhis and for the Gandhis. Essentially a Family Mafia and why should we hand over our national institions to this Family mafia.

    Mr Tharror is increasingly becoming the High Priest of Evangelical Toadism.

  6. ‘Eminent historians’ from communist stable peddled whitewashed and falsified history according to Mr Arun Shourie. Jallainwala bagh trust is past its expiry date for politicians, stop flogging the dead horse for political gains.
    The other word for ‘intellectual’ in India is communist buffoon.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here