Even the worst critics of Gen Sundarji agree that no other General of the Indian Army possessed his intellectual depth, strategic perspective, and the will to transform. He dragged the Army by its bootstraps into the 21st century.
Petrol & diesel prices have barely changed since June 2022, even though oil prices have fallen 28% since then. This has boosted profitability of OMCs and dividend payouts to govt.
ThePrint had reported earlier this month that while theaterisation is the ultimate goal, set to be rolled out one year from now, the focus is on structured jointness initiatives by 2024-end.
Discussion about outcome of Lok Sabha polls continues to boil in cauldron of expectations only from BJP. Now reverse this equation, what if we asked about the performance of the 'loser'?
The movie is really good and motivating and is based on a person who decides to challenge the society despite of his poor financial conditions….Somewhere it leaves us to rethink about some historical characters like Dronacharya who asked Eklavya to cut his right thumb and offer it to him as Guru Dakshina becoz he didn’t want eklavya to overtake Arjuna in the art of archery ……This movie shows that the children born in poor families are equally talented and intelligent..but what they really need is an optimal environment and financial support which they lack and lead them nowhere ….this is what striked Anand and he started thinking in a different way and took the responsibilities of 30 poor children..so he not only changed the life of 30 children but the whole generation after them ….Big salute to him….
Damn I can’t believe what a joke this critic has made of himself by giving this review rather than the movie. Oh my God like find some place else to rant and put out your frustration. What a joke! Unbelievable that The Print allows such stupid reviews to be published.
Go and watch movie first. These type of critics are so frustrated that they can’t even appreciate good work. In this article, it is clear that the writer has got some bribe to defame someone else. Pathetic digital media.
This review is co.completely biased. I noted that there was a mention of sexual harrassment case against vikas bahl. Nothing is proved now, and he brought out his frustration in the movie. I think, you are a more brutal feminist. You just chainsawed based on this one thing. This movie , has a story to tell. It brings it out in dramatic way, i agree, just old bollywood shit. But your review has done an outstanding job , by outranking the movie. This movie is not as bad as you wrote, but your review surely is. Do you want to tear off Aloknath too, all his previous movies, by specifically mentioning that metoo incident. Well, let the court do the work , chill out, and do not review another movie again.
Reviews should strictly be given by mentally fit people…. This journalist is certainly defaming ‘theprint’ by giving a third class and biased review and I wouldn’t want to ever subscribe to this after reading such a bad article..
PS: I saw the movie and it’s certainly a must watch and is extremely inspiring
Ok first thing first, it is a amazing movie.. I believe this is one of the movie where Hrithik has acted amazingly and not relied upon his dance….
Surprised to read such a negative bias review from author who I believe has got the job/profile basis some links because I don’t think anybody can be so pathetically wrong..
Gone are the days when half baked critics will criticise in a magzine and nobody could react to it. This criticism is certainly in a bad tase depicting the critic rather than Movie.
Are you seriously a journalist?? What have you done till date in your life?? Are you born to criticize people?? Wake up and look around you for more beautiful things!!! It should your character as human being!! The lead actor is acting his role, why are you linking that with his life?? Are you crazy?? He has done a tremendous act. You are nowhere as a journalist. Stop writing this crap or else people will throw out out!
ThePrint should not publish any such article in future without verifying the contents of the article..it’s not a review but the writers frustration and psychological conditions!! These are all pseudo journalist..India should be aware of such (donation) journalists..they are a blot to our country..
I agree, looks like they have hired some bloke to write garbage reviews….
I agree with the comments given by everyone here that it’s not the movie, but your review that is very shoddy. I generally shy away from saying anything negative but your review forced me to. And if you can’t find out anything positive in this movie, then you should definitely reconsider your career option of being a movie critic.
The heading of the article not at all matches the content! Look, I am also not a supporter of sexual assaulters or rapist. But first, nothing is proven yet against the person in concern, and second I would never let that to interfere with my thinking at a professional level.
These are the type of people because of whom India is so backward! Allowing your personal bias to interfere with a movie review is not at all professional.
You wrote this review so people don’t go and watch the movie. You are so narrow-minded and cheap thinker that you don’t even realize, that this movie has a story to tell. By not encouraging people for watching the movie, you are also indirectly hurting Anand whose story can reach millions of people! I wonder how do you go to bed every day after writing these type of reviews. Seriously, go get a life!
The article reflects more about the reviewer than the movie. I think you haven’t passed any exams that you SAT IN. In your English term. I don’t see where engineers are disrespected. Clearly you’re pro-Kangana. Pseudo feminist. Let it be your last review(if you can call this). Get a life. Buzz off
A shoddy opinionated review reeking of Bias and Neo Nazi Feminism,I guess you belong to Kangna Camp.
The Movie must be reviewed on its merits and technical aspects, How A mundane common life character becomes larger than life the movie is all about it, May be Hrithik is mis cast, but one thing audience can be sure is ,he will give his own best .Thats the kind of Commitment shown by him
Regarding directors accussed status, let him be proved by court and face the music.
Dont mix your Bias with your profession, It wont help in long run.
Your review is a disrespect to the movie and to all hard working indians alike…easy to see the contempt against the filmmaker and Hritik…
How is writing equations on a village school blackboard a disrespect to engineers ? Your mindset clearly shows disrespect for merit and the poor.
As for the actor, he might have been launched by his father but he has consistently worked hard for where he is right now.
Please make sense when you write articles for the public.
Your review too is shoddy and disrespectful to the amount of hard work put in the film. Your types will go gaga over Bharat but not a brilliant portrayal of a realistic biopic.
MADHAVI POTHUKUCHI is trying to criticize and belittle a film and its lead actor by using phrases like “exam he sits for”, this is is disastrous English or a usage of language. sits for?? u r directly translating it from your local language to english. try to be a better reader and then give a shot at writing. Turning into a critic can wait for a lifetime. SITS for??? pathetic
So
You were not expecting gully boy hero to become an underdog winner and you were least expecting that in dangal too is it?
Wow.
What an unbiased review.
Of course it will be having flaws… But please don’t go to a movie with a pre conceived notion keeping the personal side of the people behind it in mind.
where is the review ? I read entire article but could not find film review? ! I think the writer is Kangana’s friend who has written her version. you bloody wasted my time and so frustrated that I am taking out my frustration writing this.
This reviewer is a perfect example of an Idiot, According to her if an actor has to play a thief, then the actor has to be a thief in real life also, B grade reviewers…….
Inspiring flim, great job by bahl and Hrithik. It inspire those who conspire by society and their conditions. Reviewer should not biased while reviewing the film and seems unprofessional.
Not clearly an unbiased review. Seems like the reviewer is obsessed with Hrithik’s superhero image and can’t imagine him as a common man.
Also, the comments on Hrithik and Vikas ‘ s personal lives are seriously not needed.
A thing or two is always good in every film but the reviewer failed to comprehend it.
The movie is really good and motivating and is based on a person who decides to challenge the society despite of his poor financial conditions….Somewhere it leaves us to rethink about some historical characters like Dronacharya who asked Eklavya to cut his right thumb and offer it to him as Guru Dakshina becoz he didn’t want eklavya to overtake Arjuna in the art of archery ……This movie shows that the children born in poor families are equally talented and intelligent..but what they really need is an optimal environment and financial support which they lack and lead them nowhere ….this is what striked Anand and he started thinking in a different way and took the responsibilities of 30 poor children..so he not only changed the life of 30 children but the whole generation after them ….Big salute to him….
Damn I can’t believe what a joke this critic has made of himself by giving this review rather than the movie. Oh my God like find some place else to rant and put out your frustration. What a joke! Unbelievable that The Print allows such stupid reviews to be published.
Ohmygod what a bad review.
Go and watch movie first. These type of critics are so frustrated that they can’t even appreciate good work. In this article, it is clear that the writer has got some bribe to defame someone else. Pathetic digital media.
This review is co.completely biased. I noted that there was a mention of sexual harrassment case against vikas bahl. Nothing is proved now, and he brought out his frustration in the movie. I think, you are a more brutal feminist. You just chainsawed based on this one thing. This movie , has a story to tell. It brings it out in dramatic way, i agree, just old bollywood shit. But your review has done an outstanding job , by outranking the movie. This movie is not as bad as you wrote, but your review surely is. Do you want to tear off Aloknath too, all his previous movies, by specifically mentioning that metoo incident. Well, let the court do the work , chill out, and do not review another movie again.
Movie is such a waste .. unnecessary dramas ..
Bro, you need a life big time !
Who is this joker movie reviewer? Those who seen the movie will be forced to cut your bu.. Sh. T.
Reviews should strictly be given by mentally fit people…. This journalist is certainly defaming ‘theprint’ by giving a third class and biased review and I wouldn’t want to ever subscribe to this after reading such a bad article..
PS: I saw the movie and it’s certainly a must watch and is extremely inspiring
Couldnt agree more.
Ok first thing first, it is a amazing movie.. I believe this is one of the movie where Hrithik has acted amazingly and not relied upon his dance….
Surprised to read such a negative bias review from author who I believe has got the job/profile basis some links because I don’t think anybody can be so pathetically wrong..
Gone are the days when half baked critics will criticise in a magzine and nobody could react to it. This criticism is certainly in a bad tase depicting the critic rather than Movie.
Are you seriously a journalist?? What have you done till date in your life?? Are you born to criticize people?? Wake up and look around you for more beautiful things!!! It should your character as human being!! The lead actor is acting his role, why are you linking that with his life?? Are you crazy?? He has done a tremendous act. You are nowhere as a journalist. Stop writing this crap or else people will throw out out!
ThePrint should not publish any such article in future without verifying the contents of the article..it’s not a review but the writers frustration and psychological conditions!! These are all pseudo journalist..India should be aware of such (donation) journalists..they are a blot to our country..
I agree, looks like they have hired some bloke to write garbage reviews….
I agree with the comments given by everyone here that it’s not the movie, but your review that is very shoddy. I generally shy away from saying anything negative but your review forced me to. And if you can’t find out anything positive in this movie, then you should definitely reconsider your career option of being a movie critic.
I think she is from Excellent Coaching Classes. Super 30 is a masterpiece in inspiring the youth to achieve what looks impossible. Applaud the Hero.
The heading of the article not at all matches the content! Look, I am also not a supporter of sexual assaulters or rapist. But first, nothing is proven yet against the person in concern, and second I would never let that to interfere with my thinking at a professional level.
These are the type of people because of whom India is so backward! Allowing your personal bias to interfere with a movie review is not at all professional.
You wrote this review so people don’t go and watch the movie. You are so narrow-minded and cheap thinker that you don’t even realize, that this movie has a story to tell. By not encouraging people for watching the movie, you are also indirectly hurting Anand whose story can reach millions of people! I wonder how do you go to bed every day after writing these type of reviews. Seriously, go get a life!
shut up and go home
The article reflects more about the reviewer than the movie. I think you haven’t passed any exams that you SAT IN. In your English term. I don’t see where engineers are disrespected. Clearly you’re pro-Kangana. Pseudo feminist. Let it be your last review(if you can call this). Get a life. Buzz off
A shoddy opinionated review reeking of Bias and Neo Nazi Feminism,I guess you belong to Kangna Camp.
The Movie must be reviewed on its merits and technical aspects, How A mundane common life character becomes larger than life the movie is all about it, May be Hrithik is mis cast, but one thing audience can be sure is ,he will give his own best .Thats the kind of Commitment shown by him
Regarding directors accussed status, let him be proved by court and face the music.
Dont mix your Bias with your profession, It wont help in long run.
And the Moron of the decade award goes to the reviewer unchalleged ?
Get well soon bro, get some life .
Your review is a disrespect to the movie and to all hard working indians alike…easy to see the contempt against the filmmaker and Hritik…
How is writing equations on a village school blackboard a disrespect to engineers ? Your mindset clearly shows disrespect for merit and the poor.
As for the actor, he might have been launched by his father but he has consistently worked hard for where he is right now.
Please make sense when you write articles for the public.
Hard to see the disresepect for engineers in the review. Easy to see the contempt for the makers…
It was a wonderful movie…..infact should be made tax free….some people are paid to criticize…..thats their job…..come above the Kabir Singh flick…..
A most shoddy and stupid review. Full of biases and uncalled for judgements. Best not publishrd.
Your review too is shoddy and disrespectful to the amount of hard work put in the film. Your types will go gaga over Bharat but not a brilliant portrayal of a realistic biopic.
MADHAVI POTHUKUCHI is trying to criticize and belittle a film and its lead actor by using phrases like “exam he sits for”, this is is disastrous English or a usage of language. sits for?? u r directly translating it from your local language to english. try to be a better reader and then give a shot at writing. Turning into a critic can wait for a lifetime. SITS for??? pathetic
So
You were not expecting gully boy hero to become an underdog winner and you were least expecting that in dangal too is it?
Wow.
What an unbiased review.
Of course it will be having flaws… But please don’t go to a movie with a pre conceived notion keeping the personal side of the people behind it in mind.
where is the review ? I read entire article but could not find film review? ! I think the writer is Kangana’s friend who has written her version. you bloody wasted my time and so frustrated that I am taking out my frustration writing this.
This reviewer is a perfect example of an Idiot, According to her if an actor has to play a thief, then the actor has to be a thief in real life also, B grade reviewers…….
He should watch it before writing..at least Jo accha hai Appreciate karo usko
Inspiring flim, great job by bahl and Hrithik. It inspire those who conspire by society and their conditions. Reviewer should not biased while reviewing the film and seems unprofessional.
Manoj Vajpayi, Pankaj Tripathi, Nawazuddin could have played much better. Hrithik acted superficially. He is better suited for action roles
Not clearly an unbiased review. Seems like the reviewer is obsessed with Hrithik’s superhero image and can’t imagine him as a common man.
Also, the comments on Hrithik and Vikas ‘ s personal lives are seriously not needed.
A thing or two is always good in every film but the reviewer failed to comprehend it.