A bench led by CJI S.A. Bobde also made it clear that the protesting farmers gathered at Delhi’s borders would have to move to another site to carry on with their agitation.
Surjit Jyani and Harjit Singh Grewal met Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah just ahead of the latest round of negotiations with farmers.
The eighth round of talks also remained inconclusive as farm unions remained adamant on their demand for repeal of the 3 laws, which the govt is unwilling to do.
The govt asserted the farm reform laws have been welcomed by a large section of farmers in various states and asked the unions to think about the interests of the entire country.
On Thursday, farmers carried out a tractor rallies to press their demand for rollback of the laws and called it a 'rehearsal' for their proposed 26 January 'Kisan Parade' to Delhi.
Former Union Minister Harsimrat Kaur Badal also attacked Punjab govt and CM Amarinder Singh for failing to fulfil his responsibility as guardian of the state & its people.
The Modi govt has put very little on the negotiating table. It wants us to believe that the two proposed amendments in the APMC bypass Act are the most substantial concessions.
The bench, which observed that there is no improvement regarding farmers' protests, was told by the Centre that healthy discussions are going on between the govt & farmers.
Trump’s OBBB is framed to augment domestic semiconductor production and enhance trade protection, even at the expense of certain social programs such as Medicaid, food stamps, and student loans, as well as a projected ballooning federal deficit from US$2.8 to 3.3 trillion
New bill aims to fix key issues with IBC 2016, including delays & patchy implementation, and protect creditors, with window for genuine promoters to retain control of their companies.
Billed as the military’s own version of Raisina Dialogue, the event will spotlight on tech-driven warfighting, lessons from Operation Sindoor and release of three new doctrines.
Now that both IAF and PAF have made formal claims of having shot down the other’s aircraft in the 87-hour war in May, we can ask a larger question: do such numbers really matter?
What would be the legal basis of staying the farm law implementation.
Blood on SC hands
Protest at different site
Farmers not speaking Hindi
Govt handling the protest not well
This is the case of SC gone wild.
You would can challenge this stay as unconstitutional and most certainly will win in any court of law not just Supreme Khap Panchayat, where legal basis is thrown out the window.
If the law is constitutional that’s the end of story. 10 percent of farmers who are well of from 90 percent of Indian farmers are protesting then its their right.
To stay the implementation for 90 percent of the farmers is just plain injustice that too on any legal grounds.
Just because 10 percent have the loudest voice and blocking Delhi doesn’t make them right.
If the SC is really thinking about staying the implementation then it will be taking an executive decision based on loudest voice on the ground. Judiciary is meant to protect the letter and rule of law.
RIDICULOUS !! NEITHER SAYING FOR THE PROTESTING FARMERS NOR TAKING ACTION AGAINST THIS IRRESPONSIBLE GOVT. A PROTEST HAS TO BE SEEN THROUGH THE EYES OF THE PROTESTERS ONLY !! FARMERS WANT THIS LAW BE SCRAPED…GOVT. IS ADAMENT !! ADAMENT BECAUSE MODI WANTS IT.SC KNOWS IT VERY WELL !! WHY THIS DRAMA ???
If i were an MP today, I’d submit my resignation to the lordships. Quite clearly they think they are the real power centre and not an elected body. The gross overreach which the supreme court has attempted in this case and previously in interest on loans waiver case must be called out. This protest is primarily a political protest. All state assemblies and parliament must urgently convene emergency session and define the contours of SC’s power to review laws. This simply can’t be the case that SC won’t decide on the legality of the laws nor will it let it get implemented. And this is also the same SC that unnecessarily made a big broohaha on prashanta Bhushan’s tweets, doesn’t seem to care about constitutionality of revocation of art 370 and CAA and many such cases (it’s not abt whether they are good or bad but we should not let such imp legal questions hanging for years) Court should not and can not decide economic policy. Someone needs to standup to the lordships. They seem to be under the delusion that they are indeed the lords of India.
Have these justices gone rogue or become Tughlaqs? These jokers need to be cut down to size and taught a lesson that their job is to interpret the law, not to hold a public durbar. Frigging morons!
Harakiri all over again.
What would be the legal basis of staying the farm law implementation.
Blood on SC hands
Protest at different site
Farmers not speaking Hindi
Govt handling the protest not well
This is the case of SC gone wild.
You would can challenge this stay as unconstitutional and most certainly will win in any court of law not just Supreme Khap Panchayat, where legal basis is thrown out the window.
If the law is constitutional that’s the end of story. 10 percent of farmers who are well of from 90 percent of Indian farmers are protesting then its their right.
To stay the implementation for 90 percent of the farmers is just plain injustice that too on any legal grounds.
Just because 10 percent have the loudest voice and blocking Delhi doesn’t make them right.
If the SC is really thinking about staying the implementation then it will be taking an executive decision based on loudest voice on the ground. Judiciary is meant to protect the letter and rule of law.
When does it start becoming a khap panchayat.
Correct. Nice response
RIDICULOUS !! NEITHER SAYING FOR THE PROTESTING FARMERS NOR TAKING ACTION AGAINST THIS IRRESPONSIBLE GOVT. A PROTEST HAS TO BE SEEN THROUGH THE EYES OF THE PROTESTERS ONLY !! FARMERS WANT THIS LAW BE SCRAPED…GOVT. IS ADAMENT !! ADAMENT BECAUSE MODI WANTS IT.SC KNOWS IT VERY WELL !! WHY THIS DRAMA ???
If i were an MP today, I’d submit my resignation to the lordships. Quite clearly they think they are the real power centre and not an elected body. The gross overreach which the supreme court has attempted in this case and previously in interest on loans waiver case must be called out. This protest is primarily a political protest. All state assemblies and parliament must urgently convene emergency session and define the contours of SC’s power to review laws. This simply can’t be the case that SC won’t decide on the legality of the laws nor will it let it get implemented. And this is also the same SC that unnecessarily made a big broohaha on prashanta Bhushan’s tweets, doesn’t seem to care about constitutionality of revocation of art 370 and CAA and many such cases (it’s not abt whether they are good or bad but we should not let such imp legal questions hanging for years) Court should not and can not decide economic policy. Someone needs to standup to the lordships. They seem to be under the delusion that they are indeed the lords of India.
Have these justices gone rogue or become Tughlaqs? These jokers need to be cut down to size and taught a lesson that their job is to interpret the law, not to hold a public durbar. Frigging morons!