Survey involved 15,000 respondents from rural and urban India. About 50% who said they were harassed at workplace said it happened during regular work hours.
Ms X, as the judge is publicly known, claimed in 2014 that a Madhya Pradesh High Court judge asked her to dance on an item song at a function in his house.
There was so much misogyny and such oppression and humiliation of women in the many organisations I have worked at that M.J. Akbar was just one of them.
Dice have been found dating to the Bronze Age in various Harappan sites in present-day northwest India and throughout Pakistan. And it’s very possible that some had female owners.
This world is being restructured and redrawn by one man, and what’s his power? It’s not his formidable military. It’s trade. With China, it turned on him.
☆ MUKESH KUMAR, ASST. REG. LAW-1, FAILED IN HIS DUTIES TO PROTECT HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS OF CITIZENS! “TEASING ILLUSION, SHAMELESS, FAKE, TOOTHLESS PAPER TIGER-NHRC,” SAID SOLI SARABJEE.
☆ ASI NARENDER SINGH’S, NO.133,THIRD DEGREE CUSTODIAL TORTURE, CAN NOT BE CONDONED BY NHRC? NOTICE TO MR. B.S. SANDHU, I.P.S. DGP-HARYANA, GIVEN DIRECTIONS FOR PERSONAL APPEARANCE. SURREPTITIOUS.
ASI NARENDER SINGH, SI VIJAY KUMAR, SI BALRAJ SINGH, SUDEEP KUMAR SINGH, GURUGRAM, INDULGED IN THIRD DEGREE TORTURE ON INNOCENT CITIZENS. CONFESSIONS TO SURABH SINGH, IPS, IGP-SCB, BY ASI NARENDER SINGH, “LATHBAAZ” 3RD DEGREE CUSTODIAL TORTURE. SHAME ON NARENDER SINGH & SUDEEP KUMAR SINGH!
☆ Hon’ble Justice T.S. Thakur and Hon’ble Justice R. Bhanumati in Order dated 24th July, 2015 have stated, “to check the brutal use of power against innocent people brought to a police station, IT IS MANDATORY FOR POLICE STATIONS TO INSTALL CCTV CAMERAS”.
☆That the custodial torture of Zamir Ahmed Khan UP (case No. 14071/24/2001-2002) SHO-abused his power. “Because there is/was no serious injury caused to victim is disturbing. Custodial torture even without inflicting any visible injury would justify award of compensation and disciplinary action against delinquent police personnel.” NHRC.
☆Supreme Court of India has termed custodial torture as a “naked violation of human dignity that destroys victim’s self esteem and termed this inhuman treatment as a calculated assault on human dignity. An accused or suspect cannot be tortured or subject to third degree torture or be eliminated.” Justice Kuldeep Singh, Justice A.S. Anand, Justice VR Krishna Iyer of Supreme Court of India.
☆In Kishore Singh Vs State of Rajasthan, the Supreme Court of India observed, “to resort to third degree methods by police violates Article 21 of the Constitution. The police rely on fists than on wits, on torture more than on culture and the police by doing such acts cannot control crimes. Nothing is more cowardly- unconscionable than a person in police custody beaten up” (1981-SCR(1)1995).
☆Supreme Court of India Judgment in Joginder Kumar Vs State of UP on 25 April 1994, Equivalent Citations: 1994 AIR 1349, 1994 SCC (4) 260, Author: M Venkatachalliah, Justice S. Mohan.
☆ Sheela Barse case imposed upon the Duty Magistrate, to enquire from the person brought to them whether he has any complaint of torture or maltreatment?
☆ NILABATI BEHRA VS STATE OF ORISSA gives RIGHTS OF COMPENSATION.
☆ In D.K. BASU VERSUS STATE OF WEST BENGAL, SUPREME COURT OF INDIA HAS DIRECTED THAT, it was to be entered in daily diary as to who of the detainees family /friend is informed ? Supreme Court had stated that merely on the suspicion of the complicity in an offence, a person cannot be arrested.”No arrest can be made because it is lawful for the police officer to do so. Except in heinous offences, and arrest must be avoided.The rights of a citizen of Article 21 and 22(1) has to be scrupulously protected.”
☆ Further the Indian Police Act in Section 7 & SECTION 29 clearly states, “Torture in custody is a punishable act.”
☆ In Khatri Vs. State of Bihar the Supreme Court of India gave rights to legal and medical assistance
☆Article 20(3), 21, 22, 32 and 226 of the Constitution give protection to the human rights. The NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION prohibits custodial torture of any kind: mental or physical and has directed the SHO’S of all police stations to keep the suspects, “safe from any physical assault while in police custody”.
☆Article 9(5) gives ENFORCEABLE RIGHT TO COMPENSATION.
☆Rule 16. 17 ” (Ditto of PPR) DEALS WITH POWER TO SUSPEND.
RULE 16.18 DEALS WITH SUSPENSION DURING A DEPARTMENTAL ENQUIRY. FUNDAMENTAL RULE 43.
RULE 16.6 DEALS WITH CONFINEMENT TO QUARTER.
RULE 16.7 IS THE PUNISHMENT DRILL
RULE 16.8 DEALS WITH CENSURES. CHAPTER 20 DEALS WITH THE HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION (PPR)
“DURING CUSTODY THE ARRESTED PERSON IS ENTITLED TO A FAIR TREATMENT AND NO CUDTODIAL TORTURE IS PERMISSIBLE. ( PPR PAGES 219 )
SHAME ON MUKESH KUMAR! AWAKE AND ARISE NHRC!
# LET THE TRUTH PREVAIL
☆ MUKESH KUMAR, ASST. REG. LAW-1, FAILED IN HIS DUTIES TO PROTECT HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS OF CITIZENS! “TEASING ILLUSION, SHAMELESS, FAKE, TOOTHLESS PAPER TIGER-NHRC,” SAID SOLI SARABJEE.
☆ ASI NARENDER SINGH’S, NO.133,THIRD DEGREE CUSTODIAL TORTURE, CAN NOT BE CONDONED BY NHRC? NOTICE TO MR. B.S. SANDHU, I.P.S. DGP-HARYANA, GIVEN DIRECTIONS FOR PERSONAL APPEARANCE. SURREPTITIOUS.
ASI NARENDER SINGH, SI VIJAY KUMAR, SI BALRAJ SINGH, SUDEEP KUMAR SINGH, GURUGRAM, INDULGED IN THIRD DEGREE TORTURE ON INNOCENT CITIZENS. CONFESSIONS TO SURABH SINGH, IPS, IGP-SCB, BY ASI NARENDER SINGH, “LATHBAAZ” 3RD DEGREE CUSTODIAL TORTURE. SHAME ON NARENDER SINGH & SUDEEP KUMAR SINGH!
☆ Hon’ble Justice T.S. Thakur and Hon’ble Justice R. Bhanumati in Order dated 24th July, 2015 have stated, “to check the brutal use of power against innocent people brought to a police station, IT IS MANDATORY FOR POLICE STATIONS TO INSTALL CCTV CAMERAS”.
☆That the custodial torture of Zamir Ahmed Khan UP (case No. 14071/24/2001-2002) SHO-abused his power. “Because there is/was no serious injury caused to victim is disturbing. Custodial torture even without inflicting any visible injury would justify award of compensation and disciplinary action against delinquent police personnel.” NHRC.
☆Supreme Court of India has termed custodial torture as a “naked violation of human dignity that destroys victim’s self esteem and termed this inhuman treatment as a calculated assault on human dignity. An accused or suspect cannot be tortured or subject to third degree torture or be eliminated.” Justice Kuldeep Singh, Justice A.S. Anand, Justice VR Krishna Iyer of Supreme Court of India.
☆In Kishore Singh Vs State of Rajasthan, the Supreme Court of India observed, “to resort to third degree methods by police violates Article 21 of the Constitution. The police rely on fists than on wits, on torture more than on culture and the police by doing such acts cannot control crimes. Nothing is more cowardly- unconscionable than a person in police custody beaten up” (1981-SCR(1)1995).
☆Supreme Court of India Judgment in Joginder Kumar Vs State of UP on 25 April 1994, Equivalent Citations: 1994 AIR 1349, 1994 SCC (4) 260, Author: M Venkatachalliah, Justice S. Mohan.
☆ Sheela Barse case imposed upon the Duty Magistrate, to enquire from the person brought to them whether he has any complaint of torture or maltreatment?
☆ NILABATI BEHRA VS STATE OF ORISSA gives RIGHTS OF COMPENSATION.
☆ In D.K. BASU VERSUS STATE OF WEST BENGAL, SUPREME COURT OF INDIA HAS DIRECTED THAT, it was to be entered in daily diary as to who of the detainees family /friend is informed ? Supreme Court had stated that merely on the suspicion of the complicity in an offence, a person cannot be arrested.”No arrest can be made because it is lawful for the police officer to do so. Except in heinous offences, and arrest must be avoided.The rights of a citizen of Article 21 and 22(1) has to be scrupulously protected.”
☆ Further the Indian Police Act in Section 7 & SECTION 29 clearly states, “Torture in custody is a punishable act.”
☆ In Khatri Vs. State of Bihar the Supreme Court of India gave rights to legal and medical assistance
☆Article 20(3), 21, 22, 32 and 226 of the Constitution give protection to the human rights. The NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION prohibits custodial torture of any kind: mental or physical and has directed the SHO’S of all police stations to keep the suspects, “safe from any physical assault while in police custody”.
☆Article 9(5) gives ENFORCEABLE RIGHT TO COMPENSATION.
☆Rule 16. 17 ” (Ditto of PPR) DEALS WITH POWER TO SUSPEND.
RULE 16.18 DEALS WITH SUSPENSION DURING A DEPARTMENTAL ENQUIRY. FUNDAMENTAL RULE 43.
RULE 16.6 DEALS WITH CONFINEMENT TO QUARTER.
RULE 16.7 IS THE PUNISHMENT DRILL
RULE 16.8 DEALS WITH CENSURES. CHAPTER 20 DEALS WITH THE HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION (PPR)
“DURING CUSTODY THE ARRESTED PERSON IS ENTITLED TO A FAIR TREATMENT AND NO CUDTODIAL TORTURE IS PERMISSIBLE. ( PPR PAGES 219 )
SHAME ON MUKESH KUMAR! AWAKE AND ARISE NHRC!
# LET THE TRUTH PREVAIL
This is why India needs Me Too.