A new research paper suggests letting Indian Administrative Service officials work in their home states may be opening the door for greater corruption.
Set up by Lal bahadur Shastri, the Santhanam Committee's key concern was that corruption, once limited to the lower rungs of the bureaucracy, had now infected the All India Services and political leadership.
In the latest budget, the FDI limit was increased to 100 percent, but most foreign companies are not buying such large stakes in the Indian insurance sector.
Modi government had also made numerous efforts to establish peace with Pakistan but has now adopted a different path, militarily, to establish peace, adds defence minister.
As Narendra Modi becomes India’s second-longest consecutively serving Prime Minister, we look at how he compares with Indira Gandhi across four key dimensions.
The data presented might be right i dont know but mentioning of karnataka in the top during tge election days is just making it obious what bjp is trying to do here.This could serve them as they are using corruption as main subject here in the election
If the officer decided to be currupt , it does not matter is it home cadre or not..They will do as they wish..Why can’t IAS officer do curroption in states other than home cadre..He is an IAS officer ..Not a school kid..It’s based on each one thought and how they think about their job..If they think it as a service they will be good ..If they think this one not for service only for earning lot of money..They will be currupt…at any situation whatever the reason it does not matter.. Whether they r going to be loyal or currupt..It does not based on.. cadre..Such stupid research find..You are underestimating IAS officer by saying this.?
IAS, IPS services should be similar to other Central Government Class-I Services, like Engineering Services, which have no state cadre. The engineers keep on getting postings to different states, depending upon the job requirement.
यह निष्कर्ष पूर्णत: सत्य नहीं है अपितु व्यावहारिक
रूप में उक्त निष्कर्ष के प्रतिकूल भी स्थितियाँ परिलक्षित होती हैं। वस्तुतः यह व्यक्ति-व्यक्ति पर निर्भर करता है।
It’z not necessary that ias officer in home cadre all are corrupt those who come to the services with a view to help the the people of their own locality what about those & most aspirants choose home cadre becoz thay are well aware about the problems the people are facing their so thay want to irridacate these problem .In the todays world the youth have changed their midset becoz almost evry one is the victim of this corruption .As per my opinion ias officers shud be alloted home cadres as they have eye on evry problm there
We cannot be judgemental about an individual or a person. A corrupt person will be corrupt and an honest shall remain honest irrespective of his posting or cadre.
The authors has mentioned the right observation. Apert from being corrupt, the behaviour of such IAS officers are not up to mark. They are arrogant and do not trwat the local person properly. That may be due to there language advantage. So the IAS officers should not be posted in there own state. Also there should not be any state cadre. Every IAS should belong to national cadre and be transfered to different states during there career.
In a time when technological disruptions happen at a frenetic pace, with technology leveraging multiple layers of official deadwood it is right time to have a deep revisit to the civil service by the UPSC.
Total Rubbish! There are many ias officers who are working in there states and they have also received P M award for administration eg. O P CHAUDHARY in chattisgarh. In fact they are more efficient in there home cadre because of familiarity.
All know how award are managed…few get the award for there work in true sense…the district magistrate of uttarkashi has got the award for stopping 100 percent open defacation in udham singh Maher and uttarkashi…But one can see the example right on the back side of D M bunglow…
For the 1st 7 Yrs of their service they must be Allocated to Tribal Districts and then they can change cadres as per the Commission.
This is true to the core. More than 60% circumstances arise when they have to bend rules and there they learn that they aren’t breaking rules , they are just bending the laws for “Adjustment” , “Settlement”.
Politician are source of curruption and enemy of developement . Delay of project is the reason of polition interaction between developer and adminstration modi ji . You cant give certificate of goodness to your polition .
IAS has become sickness of india. None of them now wants to go in public policy framing. All of them want to go in engineering sector for loot and plunder.
This is the age of specialists, be it railways, telecom, mining, defense, industries or whatever. IAS – the generalists, is a colonial leftover. Nowhere in the developed world, you will see generalists calling the shots. Corruption and colonial hangover is the hallmark of this service. Time has come to abolish this cadre. Governance should be in the hands of specialists.
Absolute nonsense, outsiders don’t understand the local nuances simply bow down to political whims and fancies, treat locals as inferior class of citizens and are more corrupt than insiders, they also enjoy the luxury of not being noticed becoz they collect and invest outside their work place.
Berkeley SHOULD LEARN not to put out names of officers who are no way concerned with corruption.
Should have blocked names before posting the article.
First we learnt Berkeley doesn’t understand Democracy.
Now Berkeley shamelessly put names in article and proves it doesn’t understand RESPONSIBLE Journalism.
Meaningful survey.
The data presented might be right i dont know but mentioning of karnataka in the top during tge election days is just making it obious what bjp is trying to do here.This could serve them as they are using corruption as main subject here in the election
If the officer decided to be currupt , it does not matter is it home cadre or not..They will do as they wish..Why can’t IAS officer do curroption in states other than home cadre..He is an IAS officer ..Not a school kid..It’s based on each one thought and how they think about their job..If they think it as a service they will be good ..If they think this one not for service only for earning lot of money..They will be currupt…at any situation whatever the reason it does not matter.. Whether they r going to be loyal or currupt..It does not based on.. cadre..Such stupid research find..You are underestimating IAS officer by saying this.?
IAS, IPS services should be similar to other Central Government Class-I Services, like Engineering Services, which have no state cadre. The engineers keep on getting postings to different states, depending upon the job requirement.
यह निष्कर्ष पूर्णत: सत्य नहीं है अपितु व्यावहारिक
रूप में उक्त निष्कर्ष के प्रतिकूल भी स्थितियाँ परिलक्षित होती हैं। वस्तुतः यह व्यक्ति-व्यक्ति पर निर्भर करता है।
The inference is totally logical…uttarakhand has same plight…local cadre I a s officers are corrupt in all senses…both morally and economically
It’z not necessary that ias officer in home cadre all are corrupt those who come to the services with a view to help the the people of their own locality what about those & most aspirants choose home cadre becoz thay are well aware about the problems the people are facing their so thay want to irridacate these problem .In the todays world the youth have changed their midset becoz almost evry one is the victim of this corruption .As per my opinion ias officers shud be alloted home cadres as they have eye on evry problm there
Rightly said
We cannot be judgemental about an individual or a person. A corrupt person will be corrupt and an honest shall remain honest irrespective of his posting or cadre.
Yes,I fully agree with above mentioned comment.
The authors has mentioned the right observation. Apert from being corrupt, the behaviour of such IAS officers are not up to mark. They are arrogant and do not trwat the local person properly. That may be due to there language advantage. So the IAS officers should not be posted in there own state. Also there should not be any state cadre. Every IAS should belong to national cadre and be transfered to different states during there career.
ALL CIVIL SERVANTS BECOME CORROUPT AS SOON AS THE TOOK CHARGE INDEPENDETLY AND BECOME SELFISH
Very nice
In a time when technological disruptions happen at a frenetic pace, with technology leveraging multiple layers of official deadwood it is right time to have a deep revisit to the civil service by the UPSC.
Total Rubbish! There are many ias officers who are working in there states and they have also received P M award for administration eg. O P CHAUDHARY in chattisgarh. In fact they are more efficient in there home cadre because of familiarity.
All know how award are managed…few get the award for there work in true sense…the district magistrate of uttarkashi has got the award for stopping 100 percent open defacation in udham singh Maher and uttarkashi…But one can see the example right on the back side of D M bunglow…
For the 1st 7 Yrs of their service they must be Allocated to Tribal Districts and then they can change cadres as per the Commission.
This is true to the core. More than 60% circumstances arise when they have to bend rules and there they learn that they aren’t breaking rules , they are just bending the laws for “Adjustment” , “Settlement”.
Politician are source of curruption and enemy of developement . Delay of project is the reason of polition interaction between developer and adminstration modi ji . You cant give certificate of goodness to your polition .
IAS has become sickness of india. None of them now wants to go in public policy framing. All of them want to go in engineering sector for loot and plunder.
This is the age of specialists, be it railways, telecom, mining, defense, industries or whatever. IAS – the generalists, is a colonial leftover. Nowhere in the developed world, you will see generalists calling the shots. Corruption and colonial hangover is the hallmark of this service. Time has come to abolish this cadre. Governance should be in the hands of specialists.
Absolute nonsense, outsiders don’t understand the local nuances simply bow down to political whims and fancies, treat locals as inferior class of citizens and are more corrupt than insiders, they also enjoy the luxury of not being noticed becoz they collect and invest outside their work place.
Have a better, BALANCED EDITOR for your content PLEASE.
Nice Article, by Berkeley University.
Berkeley SHOULD LEARN not to put out names of officers who are no way concerned with corruption.
Should have blocked names before posting the article.
First we learnt Berkeley doesn’t understand Democracy.
Now Berkeley shamelessly put names in article and proves it doesn’t understand RESPONSIBLE Journalism.
Editing will not be able to change facts.