scorecardresearch
Thursday, March 28, 2024
Support Our Journalism
HomePolitics‘Manipulated media’ — Twitter flags BJP IT cell head Amit Malviya’s farmer...

‘Manipulated media’ — Twitter flags BJP IT cell head Amit Malviya’s farmer protest tweet

Malviya had claimed Rahul Gandhi’s tweet showing a cane-wielding policeman charging an old farmer was ‘propaganda’, but fact-checkers have shown it was real.

Follow Us :
Text Size:

New Delhi: Twitter has labelled BJP IT cell head Amit Malviya’s tweet on a farmer being lathi-charged during the protests outside the national capital as “manipulated media”.

A 28 November tweet by Malviya said: “Rahul Gandhi must be the most discredited opposition leader India has seen in a long long time.”

— Amit Malviya (@amitmalviya) November 28, 2020

Malviya’s tweet was a response to Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s post in Hindi showing a policeman charging an aged farmer. Gandhi’s tweet read: “It is a very sad photo. Our slogan was ‘Jai Jawan, Jai Kisan’, but today, PM Modi’s arrogance has made the jawan stand against the farmer. This is very dangerous.”

But Malviya’s tweet aimed to challenge Gandhi’s assertion that a policeman is charging the farmer with a stick. It included a post that compared two visuals — one, the image tweeted by Gandhi, which was tagged “propaganda” and “police beating an old farmer”, and the other a short video clip titled “reality”, and “police didn’t even touch the farmer”.

However, according to fact-checkers, this short video is manipulated.

Malviya did not respond to ThePrint’s calls, text messages and WhatsApp chats.

A Twitter spokesperson, meanwhile, told ThePrint on email: “The referenced tweet was labelled based on our Synthetic and Manipulated Media policy.”

In February 2020, Twitter announced its rules on synthetic and manipulated media and started labelling tweets.

The policy states: “We may label tweets containing synthetic and manipulated media to help people understand their authenticity and to provide additional context.”

It adds: “We may label tweets that include media (videos, audio, and images) that have been deceptively altered or fabricated.”


Also read: BJP alleges Khalistani agenda behind farmer protests, says Congress playing with fire


Fact-checks

International news organisations RT (Russia) and Voice of America (USA) have shared a longer version of the video that shows two policemen took aim at the farmer in question. The short clip featured in Malviya’s post only showed the second policeman who swung the baton at the farmer, but missed hitting him.

In a 1 December article, fact-checking site Boom spoke to the farmer in the photo, 57-year-old Sukhdev Singh, who confirmed he had sustained injuries in the police charge. “I have injuries on my legs, back and arms,” the article quotes him as saying.

Twitter is yet to clarify if the company labelled Malviya’s tweet as manipulated before or after fact-checking sites called it out.


Also read: Subramanian Swamy attacks Amit Malviya, calls for sacking of BJP IT cell members


 

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube, Telegram & WhatsApp

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism

2 COMMENTS

  1. Disclaimer: Want. The best for farmers and want the best for the country. No doubts on that.
    To protest is a rights in democracy. No doubt on that either. Can such protests (Right or wrong) tread on the toes of the public by disrupting / destroying public conveniences? (Like blocking railway lines / roads etc) The courts too have ruled against that

    Just asking

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular