File photo of Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey and Narendra Modi | Jack/Twitter
File photo of Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey and Narendra Modi | @jack/Twitter
Text Size:

German philosopher and theorist Jürgen Habermas gave us the concept of public sphere. As opposed to the state narrative, which was largely meant for the consumption of a passive public, the public sphere was the space where a society had conversation with itself through newspapers, journals, reading clubs, coffee houses and so on. With the rise of commercial big media, Habermas rued the death of the public sphere. As TV news aligned itself with the state or powerful groups, it was reduced to propaganda. Case in point: how TV news and big media manufacture public consent for America’s endless wars.

There was a time of revolution, when the blogging wave hit one country after the other. Unhindered by the limitations of traditional media, bloggers across the world were shaking up public discourse. This is before Twitter and Facebook arrived, and the phrase social media had not even been heard of. It seemed like a time of great promise for freedom and liberty. The mainstream media’s hegemony over public conversation was being undone.

With Facebook and, particularly, Twitter, it seemed as if the public could have the public sphere back. The Arab Spring and myriad other revolutions big and small across the world were proof. Habermas himself appreciated the power of the internet to be subversive against authoritarian regimes, but worried about fragmentation. There was no unified public sphere anymore, it seemed.

He needn’t have worried. Twitter’s Trending Topic section for instance (copied unsuccessfully by Facebook) tried to create a unified sense of a public conversation. We now have the opposite problem: Twitter’s Trending Topics is actually ‘Manipulated Topics’. Almost every single trend is an organised political or commercial activity. The public sphere is dead once again. The people’s voice is now drowned out by that of the state narrative.

*

If you watch PBS Frontline’s recent documentary film ‘The Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia’, most of it will seem like a privileged insight into Mohammad bin Salman’s way of thinking about the future of Saudi Arabia, both in terms of modernising it and his authoritarianism. It’s an educational film about the social and political transformation a country is going through. Much of the film is about the Saudi government’s brutal execution of dissident journalist Jamal Khashoggi.

There’s a point in the film that’s chilling to watch for someone in India: the Saudi government’s use of Twitter to harass and intimidate critics into silence, to dominate the public narrative and use propaganda to push out critical conversation. A political expert in the film says the Saudi crown prince uses Twitter as a primary means of shaping the public debate and thus controlling power.

It’s chilling to watch this in India because that’s exactly what happens in India today. And India is not the only country in the world where this would seem familiar. There are very few countries where it will seem unfamiliar. The ease with which governments and powerful groups manipulate Twitter and hijack the public conversation are in contrast to the promise of social media. Here is a medium that was meant to be a subversive tool against authoritarian regimes. Instead, it has become a powerful weapon in the hands of authoritarian regimes. Worse, it is enabling authoritarianism, making India and America and Saudi Arabia all look quite alike.


Also read: Russian trolls, fake news & ego boosts for retweets — NYT study decodes Trump’s Twitter


When Saudi seems familiar to India

Once seen as a democratising force, Twitter is now emerging as a top threat to democracy all over the world.

While Twitter is about influencers, Facebook is about masses. We have seen how, in the US and elsewhere, Facebook has been used to indoctrinate the masses through fake news. In countries like Brazil and India, WhatsApp has emerged as a fake news distributor. But Facebook as a company gets a lot of flak for this, and for good reason. Politicians in the US are threatening to break up Facebook as a company because it’s just too big.

Twitter, on the other hand, gets away with murder.

In the case of Saudi Arabia, it was found that the authorities apparently had a mole inside Twitter leaking the private data of citizens.

Twitter’s pompous hippy CEO, Jack Dorsey, recently announced a complete ban on political advertising on the social media platform. This was to cock a snook at Facebook. But Twitter never had a fake news ad problem. One doesn’t need to even advertise on Twitter to manipulate it. It’s telling that Dorsey’s platform does not even have a fake news policy. You’re allowed to spread fake news on Twitter but you can’t put out an ad advertising your truthful political campaign. That’s Twitter for you.


Also read: SC lawyer Sanjay Hegde tangles with Twitter over ‘defiance’ photo from 1936 Nazi Germany


Turning point

Until now, Twitter in India was a bumbling fool not knowing what to do. Its policies were more arbitrary than malicious. But now it has taken a clear turn towards the dark side. Anti-establishment critics are seeing their Twitter accounts get suspended for the silliest of reasons. People get blackmail messages through the misuse of Twitter’s reporting tools: your account is locked until you delete this harmless tweet. By contrast, there have been incidents when Twitter has not found rape and death threats to be violative of its policies.

Meanwhile, hate-mongering flourishes on the platform. It took Twitter more than 48 hours to remove Muslim-bashing hashtags from its Trending Topics last month. Its policies about verifying public figures or taking down violent threats used to be arbitrary; now they are plain discriminatory. The case of Sanjay Hegde is a turning point for Twitter in India. The platform’s reputation for neutrality and fairness is now ruined irreparably.

We can sit back and watch in total resignation. We can protest but we won’t be heard since Twitter is clearly busy crawling before all the world’s authoritarian regimes. Or, we can try an alternative, such as the decentralised Mastodon, that many in India have begun trying. Whatever the answer, we have to find one.


Also read: Blue tick not just a verification mark but a mark of Twitter’s caste bias, say users


Views are personal.

ThePrint is now on Telegram. For the best reports & opinion on politics, governance and more, subscribe to ThePrint on Telegram.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel.

10 Comments Share Your Views

10 COMMENTS

  1. Any organization or platform which refuses to be controlled or manipulated by the liberal/secular cabal is quite conveniently termed as a “threat” to democracy. Democracy is safe only when the liberal elites monopolize administration, politics and media.

  2. It took a twitter for you guys to admit that mainstream Media was corrupt and were aligning only with political masters for money. Basically the “public sphere” was poisoned only by mainstream media till twitter became popular, and leftist gang was able to control the narrative to their narrative. Now everyone has found a way to influence the narrative with social media. Using the “fake news” phrase, earlier only main stream media peddled fake news now everyone can do so with social media. So many narratives sounds cacophonous to the people who lost part of control over narrative (and with that the money).

    Democracy in true sense is cacophonous – Live with it .In a way democracy is more vibrant.

  3. Democracy doesn’t mean mortgaging citizens or countries security. Liberals have achieved nothing but are siding with Chines authoritarian rules where as don’t care for people there. UN vote clearly shows Chinese are backing terrorists but destroying there own Muslims.

  4. !! Asatyam Shivam Sadaa Sandesham !!

    Shivam We…zzzzzz emerges as a top threat to journalism in India and across the world.

    The actual photo for this articale should have been Jack Dorsey endorsing “Smash Brahminical patriarchy” which he did under racial prejudice. That would have shown Twitter’s real face.
    But Shivam being Shivam, could not resist Modi’s charm atleast in photo.

  5. I am very happy with the support Shri Sanjay Hegde is receiving, including from people who have large followings on the platform. If Twitter finds him too hot to handle, it will soon become as antiseptic as a railway station in Switzerland.

    • India is Twitter’s largest market. And it is now clear that Twitter prefers to retain its market by listening to the BJP’s demands than be ethical and honest.
      Sanjay Hegde is a decent guy and his views are very democratic. By banning him, Twitter is behaving like Trump and Modi. Time to see through Twitter

      • Do you want terrorist and Chinese authoritarian rule in India or want ISIS flag in India? One has to choose between freedom and security, all except a few will choose later. Today there are not just individual terrorists but nations like Pakistan and China are openly siding with them and is visible in UN votes.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here