Friday, 12 August, 2022
HomeOpinionTripura shows us why the BJP could win 2019 without delivering 'Achhe...

Tripura shows us why the BJP could win 2019 without delivering ‘Achhe Din’

Text Size:

The BJP as a political party in India today is what the Left in Bengal and Tripura were, a party without an opposition, capturing all spaces, all leaders, all issues.

If the BJP is the victor today, whatever happened to all the talk of the Modi government’s sliding political narrative? And all that talk about the message from rural Gujarat and Rajasthan, the farm crisis, rural distress, unemployment and Nirav Modi’s escape after swindling thousands of crores?

The answer lies in the BJP’s election machinery that fights elections like a guerrilla army, making itself appear the only choice before voters.

The BJP as a political party in India today is what the Left in Bengal and Tripura were, a party without an opposition, capturing all spaces, all narratives, all leaders, all issues.

The rise and fall of the Left in Tripura is instructive.

Wanting to win, not waiting

In 1993, Prime Minister Narasimha Rao imposed President’s rule in Tripura, sacrificing a Congress government there to gain the support of the Left parties at the Centre. Rao needed to do this to save his own minority government.

Later that year, the Left came to power in Tripura. After that, the Left won five consecutive elections in Tripura because the Congress never tried to win the state. Tripura, for 25 years, has been a one-party state with hardly an opposition.

The BJP’s slogan in Tripura was “Chalo Paltai”, a clarion call to overthrow the Left. The Congress as an opposition party doesn’t seek to paltai. It lingers on so that it automatically gets power when people get fed up with the incumbent, or gets replaced by a smarter opposition – the BJP in Tripura, for instance.

The BJP is sweeping Tripura today by being an opposition party that wants to win. It occupied the entire anti-incumbency spectrum, bringing under its umbrella Bengalis with tribals, RSS workers with Congress cadres, even gobbling up the Trinamool Congress’ significant presence overnight. It matched the CPM’s cadres with its panna pramukhs – one man to persuade 60 voters each.

The BJP didn’t stand a chance in Nagaland and Meghalaya. In Nagaland, it smartly backed a popular rebel from its own ally. In Meghalaya, unpopular with an apprehensive Christian majority, the BJP smartly stayed on the sidelines and now hopes to form the government with clever coalition-making – even though the Congress is likely emerging as the single largest party.

The NaMo question

Does any of that mean the Modi government is not facing discontent from farmers? Or that unemployment is not a big issue across India? Or that Nirav Modi’s and Mehul Choksi’s bank frauds and easy escapes don’t make the Modi government look negligent on crony capitalism?

How much of the BJP’s Tripura victory is because of Modi’s popularity, and how much because it stole away the entire leadership and cadres of the Congress and the Trinamool? What was it that made the difference – the promise of development or an unlikely alliance with a tribal party that wants a separate state?

Soon after the Modi government brought about an end to the Haj subsidy for Muslims, the BJP promised free Jerusalem trips to senior citizens in Nagaland. So, is it Swachh Bharat or dreams of the holy land that made Nagaland vote for BJP ally Neiphiu Rio?

This was a moot point in Gujarat too. After 27 years of ruling the state, BJP had anti-incumbency worth many elections piled up against it. There were three social movements, the Modi factor was missing, and people were unhappy with GST and MSP. In such a scenario, if the BJP was the opposition, there’s no way the incumbent could have won another term. Yet it did, because the incumbent was the BJP.

Where Right met Left

In West Bengal and Tripura, the Left parties kept winning election after election thanks to their famed cadres, their complete mastery over the election system, co-option of local elites, state institutions and civil society alike. It’s not as if there was Ram Rajya and no anti-incumbency all these years in these states.

The BJP’s election machinery will make us reminiscent of the Left rule in Bengal and Tripura. The party has a Left-like single-minded focus on winning elections. This juggernaut is able to ride anti-incumbency again and again – unless its opponent has that same grit to win, such as Arvind Kejriwal in Delhi or Nitish Kumar in Bihar in 2015.

This is why the BJP could also win Karnataka despite Siddaramaiah’s best efforts, and this is why it could win 2019 without delivering Achhe Din.

Shivam Vij is a political commentator based in New Delhi.

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism


  1. Rahul Gandhi can never become P.M. If Rahul replace by Priyanka Gandhi than Congress have chance to survive.
    Moh tyago bete ka beti ki chance do.

  2. Absolutely right!
    Now the time has come either perform or perish!
    If you perform or do an honest effort to do so, no Modi can stop you but if you don’t then even novice like Kejriwal can destroy you…

    We Indians are no longer the same…

  3. I think as like other commentators on Left’s politics Shivam Vij also smartly avoided to expose real fault lines of the Left. Like other parties they too have got ample opportunities to prove themselves but they did nothing in the States rulled by them for long periods.Therefore, they have nothing in their kitty to show case proudly.Feeding the people only with redundant rhetorics is not going help any more.They could have transformed the WB & Tripura in such a way that the whole India could see.Who stopped them to bring prosperity, employment which could in turn have brought material change in thr lives of common man.They failed miserably but still showing arrogance instead of remorse.

  4. Shivam vij is surely missing an important point or two, namely bad governance of Manik sarkar government in Tripura and governance record of BJP at centre and several states. To give credit only to election machinery only is just trying to remain in denial.

Comments are closed.

Most Popular