Monday, 4 July, 2022
HomeOpinionMany Pakistanis with Ivy League PhDs support discrimination against Ahmadis

Many Pakistanis with Ivy League PhDs support discrimination against Ahmadis

Text Size:

Pakistan’s deep-rooted religious-nationalist prejudices will not disappear unless they are methodically confronted and opposed.

Pakistan’s recent controversy over the appointment of an Ahmadi economist to an advisory panel is emblematic of the country’s deeper psychosis of identity. Confronting ideological demons is more important for Pakistan than promises by the country’s best and brightest to provide it good technocratic advice.

Princeton University economist, Atif R. Mian, was first appointed to Prime Minister Imran Khan’s Economic Advisory Council (EAC) and then forced to resign on grounds that he belonged to the Ahmadiyya community. Soon after Atif Mian resigned, two other internationally respected economists of Pakistani origin, Asim Khwaja of Harvard University and Imran Rasul of University College of London, also resigned in solidarity.

All of them promised to continue trying to ‘help Pakistan’, probably with their wise economic counsel.

Also read: Insulting removal of Princeton prof shows Pakistan has forgotten Jinnah’s view on Ahmadis

But just as correct diagnosis is important before even the best surgeon can deal with cancerous growth, it is important for Pakistan’s great economic minds to understand why their expertise was valued less than their religious or sectarian affiliation.

Atif Mian attributed the campaign against his inclusion in the advisory committee to ‘opposition from Mullahs’. He ignored the fact that Imran Khan had himself made protection of Khatm-e-Nabuwat (Finality of Prophethood) – a code for anti-Ahmadi rhetoric and violence – a plank of his election campaign.

That religion became an issue in selecting economists best suited to guide Pakistan when it is facing an economic crisis was not surprising, given the political and ideological dynamics of the country.

While Atif Mian, Asim Khwaja and Imran Rasul might be among the best of the best that Pakistan has produced, Pakistan’s problems are not due to the absence of technocrats, economists, or other professionals.

Even those Pakistani governments that earned a reputation for poor governance often had at least some good technocrats available to them for advice or policymaking.

Pakistan’s problem essentially is an ideological and political one. As I point out in my book Reimagining Pakistan, much of Pakistan’s dysfunction is the result of its inability to answer questions bred by conflicting expectations, most of them relating to its national narrative.

How Islamic is Pakistan meant to be? What does it mean to be an Islamic state in modern times? What should be the balance of power between a central Pakistani government and the various provinces representing various nationalities and ethnic groups? Must Pakistan forever be at war with India to justify its existence as a separate state? If so, how can it avoid dominance by the military and militants?

Although ideological questions have preoccupied Pakistanis, theirs is not the only contemporary nation state that started out as an idea. It differs from others, however, in not evolving an identity beyond the grievances that fuelled the demand for a separate Muslim state in the subcontinent.

The combustible mix of religion and politics, the pursuit of nuclear weapons, the acceptance and encouragement of terrorism, and the angry tone in Pakistan’s relations with the rest of the world are all by-products of the indignation that helped create Pakistan and has since been nurtured by the Pakistani state.

The two-pronged approach of many Pakistani writers painting a sunny picture of their country is to insist that Pakistan’s accomplishments serve as both its justification and its potential while laying its problems at the door of historic injustices or current international malfeasance. Responsibility for collective failure or miscalculation can be avoided by lamenting the absence of good leaders.

There appears little willingness to consider that Pakistan might need to review some of the fundamental assumptions in its national belief system – militarism, radical Islamist ideology, perennial conflict with India, dependence on external support, and refusal to recognise ethnic identities and religious pluralism – to break out of a permanent crisis mode and move towards a more stable future.

Defining Pakistan’s nationalism through Islam exposed the country to the paradox of setting a national boundary upon a universalist faith. Consequently, Pakistan’s Islamists, and often the state apparatus, have sought to manipulate religious sentiment to bolster nationalist feeling without intending to establish the Islamic state they constantly talk about.

Islamic ideology not only sets Pakistan apart from India, notwithstanding many commonalities of history, culture and social mores; it also musters a diverse nation’s energies in pushing back policy pressures from major international powers. In some ways, it is a weapon amid weakness even if it is a gun held to one’s own head.

Constant indignation at real or perceived indignities against Islam is a useful device for Pakistan’s leaders. They distract from substantive economic and social issues. Quite often, religious rage is generated through falsehoods and rumours, which are systematically deployed as vehicles of policy.

I have run into many Pakistanis with PhDs, including some who work for the World Bank, who argue in favour of Pakistan’s constitutional discrimination against Ahmadis. “Why don’t they just acknowledge that they are not Muslims, then they can live in Pakistan, like Hindus, Christians, Sikhs and Parsis,” one of them once asked me.

Even their Ivy League university PhDs fail to help them understand that defining a religion in the modern era is a personal or possibly a social matter, not something that can be dealt with through the constitution or legislation.

Also read: Imran Khan sacking Princeton professor can invite EU censure, hit Pakistan’s trade ties

Thus, Catholics can consider Protestants as non-Christians and Protestants can think likewise about Catholics. Both Catholics and Protestants can consider the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormons) a religion outside Christianity. But there is not a single country in the world that has legislated on the matter of who is or is not a Christian, which is how it should be.

It is important to remember that such legislation also runs contrary to the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, to which Pakistan is a signatory. That declaration not only guarantees freedom of religion but also the freedom to change religion. Heresy is, therefore, now a religious concept, not a legal one.

By insisting on their religious sentiment being superior to the religious views or feelings of others, Pakistanis effectively end up separating themselves from the rest of the world. Pakistan’s international isolation will not end until Pakistanis can understand why the rest of the world finds their religious nationalism out of step with the 21st century.

Pakistani national identity is also deeply intertwined with negative sentiments about people of other religions, most notably Hindus but Jews and Christians as well.

When endemic prejudice becomes part of nationalism, economists, technocrats, and professionals can’t help overcome it.

Even if Atif Mian, Asim Khwaja and Imran Rasul help Pakistan’s economic growth through sensible policy recommendations, the deep-rooted religious-nationalist prejudices will not disappear unless they are methodically confronted and opposed.

Also readImran Khan shows his cowardice by dropping Princeton prof Atif Mian over Ahmedia identity

Nazi Germany, imperialist Japan and fascist Italy did not have a dearth of good economic planners, scientists, engineers, and doctors. They just did not have enough political and social activists who could resist the rise of extremism.

It is sad that some of the best Pakistani minds sitting in international organisations and doing great research in academia abroad tend to avoid political controversy that is inevitable when you challenge dogma and wrong narratives.

Confronting misdirected religious nationalism might be more important for Pakistan right now than simply setting state finances right.

The author is the director for South and Central Asia at the Hudson Institute in Washington D.C., was Pakistan’s ambassador to the United States from 2008-11. His latest book is ‘Reimagining Pakistan.’

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Why news media is in crisis & How you can fix it

India needs free, fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism even more as it faces multiple crises.

But the news media is in a crisis of its own. There have been brutal layoffs and pay-cuts. The best of journalism is shrinking, yielding to crude prime-time spectacle.

ThePrint has the finest young reporters, columnists and editors working for it. Sustaining journalism of this quality needs smart and thinking people like you to pay for it. Whether you live in India or overseas, you can do it here.

Support Our Journalism


  1. Mr Haqqani ever since you joined the Hudson Institute you have been on a tear, to jump out of your skin at every opportunity, & play your pitbull role. It is clear you understand the fault lines in Pak politics & society but you’re disingenuous in characterizing your observations to promote a negative perception in the West. You have zero resonance or readership outside of neocon US policy circles. Your thesis here is based on talking to a handful of Ivy PhDs in the World Bank. Since you have been rehabilitated in the wilderness & are in effective exile, it is necessary to keep burnishing your brand in order to earn your keep. You have to ask yourself. Are you doing any good with your narrow perspective? It is instructive how you leave out many increasing positives in Pakistan today. If you were here you would appreciate the wave of optimism & relief at finally having a govt which speaks honestly. When they make mistakes they correct them, but the anglicized liberal elite term these U turns. There are many internal & external problems (fiscal, social, finances, jobs, health, literacy, poverty, water, security) but we are addressing them. In a few years even your vitriol will fall on deaf ears as it becomes less & less believable. You may even decide to relocate back here in your dotage. As for your facile one-dimensional argument about Ahmedis, it is a deeper historical issue than just a religious sect being cast out. It would be time well spent if you investigated the Ahmedi jamaat and its outposts in UK & Israel, to grasp its political tonality. It is not the poor rural Ahmedi in Punjab that is the target of ire, even though the fault lines you know are used by miscreants to foment violence against them. The violence is real, and so is the anger at the jamat’s political machinations under the garb of religion. But you will never highlight this because it would be an awkward truth which is tough to square with your raison d’etre – a litany of diatribes to keep your paycheck going at Hudson.

  2. A brilliant piece by Husain Haqqani like his monumental “Reimagining Pakistan”. Few people have recognized that the emergence of rightwingers in my country i.e. India is also, in a way, linked to Pakistan’s policies of islamic fundamentalism since most of Hindus see Pakistan as persecutors of Hindus with the heady mix of same lot that invaded India in meidival times,ruled with iron hand, destroyed their temples, religious icons, indulged in forcible conversions to islam and so on
    It has a sinister fall out as hatred towards muslim of India by Hindus. Politicians are taking advantage of this situation by polarising people on religious lines. India areat constitution but social structures sometimes go awry due tomorrow public sentiments. Thus Pakistan is not only hurting itself but also hurting the social and political fabric of India. It has sleeper cells among Indian Muslims,aided and abetted by Pakistani ISI. Therefore Pakistan has become a dangerous state in the sub continent

Comments are closed.

Most Popular