With so much happening in Kashmir since 5 August, when the Narendra Modi government unilaterally revoked Article 370 and bifurcated the state of J&K, putting the entire state under a lockdown, all sides are trying to push their ideologies and propaganda. In such scenarios, the truth often takes a back seat.
On 26 September, ThePrint published an article titled “I went to meet pellet gun victims in Soura, the new epicentre of Kashmir’s anger” by Abhijit Iyer-Mitra on the Anchar region of Srinagar, which has been witnessing protests and resistance since 5 August. The author basically went on what seemed to be a ‘disappointing’ search for pellet victims in Anchar. He also questioned the existence of other crises, like medicine shortages.
“I was there to look at verifiable injuries, not listen to narratives,” he wrote. On the face of it, this seemed like an objective quest for truth, unclouded by bias. It is true that the voice of local people in Anchar is missing in mainstream media. But as the article unfolded, it was clear that the writer was pushing his own narrative, based on scattered and piecemeal anecdotal evidence. With a splash of misogyny too. He described the women of Anchar as “feisty”, non-burkha clad, and “happy to talk to a stranger”. Gasp. He described a woman in a hospital, who he didn’t directly converse with, giggling about the innocence (or lack thereof) of a pellet victim.
The author described local people as being prone to hyperbole and “exaggeration”.
It is this callous approach and lack of empathy and understanding that have been one among the many “verifiable injuries” inflicted upon the people of the Valley particularly since 5 August, and for decades in general.
In the midst of all this, there are also certain “facts” that the author has put forth based on his visit. Having been there around the same time (I visited Anchar for four consecutive days from 12-15 September), let’s examine some of these.
We are deeply grateful to our readers & viewers for their time, trust and subscriptions.
Quality journalism is expensive and needs readers to pay for it. Your support will define our work and ThePrint’s future.
Facts and findings
The first factual inaccuracy crops up in the date of the clash mentioned in the article. The author said he was there to witness the aftermath of 12 September clashes between protesters and the police. “Unseen till the end remained the mysterious pellet gun victims of the 12 September clashes,” he wrote.
I was in Soura on 12 September and absolutely nothing happened that day. However, the next day, 13 September (Friday), residents took out a protest march after offering prayers at the Jenab Sahib shrine. This is when I saw the police firing pellets at them. An inaccuracy in date may seem like a small discrepancy, but in a “fact-finding trip”, if the most basic fact itself is incorrect, it raises alarms regarding the reliability of the ‘facts’ that follow.
The author also posed two questions that he seemed unable to find answers to.
- “If troops aren’t allowed into Anchar, how exactly did this pelting-pelleting (with 40-200 injuries) happen?”
Here is the answer. The police station is just 2 kms from Anchar. The police can fire pellets from just outside the Anchar locality. When pellets are fired, they get dispersed over a distance of around 50 metres. That is how the police fired pellets without entering the locality. There was no stone-pelting on 13 September.
- Where are the victims?
Here they are. I took these photographs on September 13 between 3.45 pm and 4 pm. The pellets were fired at 3.30 pm.
These images also include pellet wounds of the “12-year-old boy” who according to the author “suffered superficial wounds to the back of his head”.
The medical crisis
While explaining the medical situation in Srinagar, the author described a man who found all medicines prescribed to him in the local pharmacy, without mentioning his ailment or the medicines he bought. This was followed by a generic claim about how Kashmir is not facing a medicine shortage.
To counter this with anecdotal evidence (since that seems to be the order of the day) that I gathered myself, a woman I know from Barbar Shah, the gateway to downtown Srinagar, visited the Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS) twice to get medicines for her husband suffering from a tumour because she couldn’t find it in any local pharmacy.
The author also talked about a patient from Nubra who received “first-class treatment” at the hospital. The point the author missed out is that in addition to shortage of life-saving drugs, chronic patients of cancer, diabetes and those undergoing dialysis are the ones facing the maximum brunt of this lockdown. Recently, a urologist was detained because he spoke about precisely the same issue.
What the author, from the comforts of a chauffeur-driven car, did not seem to realise is that the inability to access a hospital in a shutdown is not just a result of blocked roads and barricades. Patients across Kashmir have been unable to avail of public transport services since 5 August.
Indeed, going around Srinagar (already a better spot for healthcare given that it is the capital) in a car with a driver, whom the author mentioned several times, is a privilege not everyone can afford.
Of course, it is worth mentioning that the article was written after restrictions were eased considerably. But under no circumstances can the situation in Kashmir be passed off as normal.
What I saw
On 12 September, there were no clashes or pellet firing in Anchar. The next day, I visited Anchar at 11 am. There were barbed wires on the narrow road leading to the locality. While entering Anchar through the SKIMS side, a few policemen stopped me and asked me where was I going and why.
On finally reaching Anchar, I spent time with the local people – a few girls in the house I visited were preparing posters for the post-namaz rally. At 1:30 pm, we went to Jenab Sahib and offered namaz. At 2:15 pm, men had started gathering in the lawns of the complex while women gathered near the women-only masjid.
Exactly 10 minutes later, they all started sloganeering and marching together. This went on for nearly an hour. Several media-persons were present to cover it. After the rally was over and protesters returned to Jenab Sahib – some chose to just sit on the streets – pellets were fired.
Five people were injured and immediately rushed to the Jenab Sahib complex for treatment. People of Anchar do not send the injured to hospital fearing arrests. However, the 12-year-old boy, whose injuries the author described as “superficial”, had to be rushed to SKIMS because of the severity of the pellet injuries on the back of his head.
The local people told me that there have been instances when the police have not allowed ambulances from picking up victims, unless they are dropped to the police station first instead of the hospital. A report by Independent quotes a doctor saying that hospitals have been asked to keep admission of patients “related to clashes to a minimum” in order to keep the numbers down.
“But boy do they know how to spin a yarn and market it,” Abhijit Iyer-Mitra wrote about the people of Anchar. This vantage point, it seems, is also sheltered from the perils of self-awareness.
The author is a freelance photographer and a social activist based in Kashmir. Views are personal.
News media is in a crisis & only you can fix it
You are reading this because you value good, intelligent and objective journalism. We thank you for your time and your trust.
You also know that the news media is facing an unprecedented crisis. It is likely that you are also hearing of the brutal layoffs and pay-cuts hitting the industry. There are many reasons why the media’s economics is broken. But a big one is that good people are not yet paying enough for good journalism.
We have a newsroom filled with talented young reporters. We also have the country’s most robust editing and fact-checking team, finest news photographers and video professionals. We are building India’s most ambitious and energetic news platform. And we aren’t even three yet.
At ThePrint, we invest in quality journalists. We pay them fairly and on time even in this difficult period. As you may have noticed, we do not flinch from spending whatever it takes to make sure our reporters reach where the story is. Our stellar coronavirus coverage is a good example. You can check some of it here.
This comes with a sizable cost. For us to continue bringing quality journalism, we need readers like you to pay for it. Because the advertising market is broken too.
If you think we deserve your support, do join us in this endeavour to strengthen fair, free, courageous, and questioning journalism, please click on the link below. Your support will define our journalism, and ThePrint’s future. It will take just a few seconds of your time.