The prominent view among the Indian commentariat following the Supreme Court’s Ayodhya verdict last week was this: voters don’t care, and we should all move on.
Political commentators like to remind the public that Indian voters don’t really care about religion. “Development”, they say, is the only issue on the voters’ minds and they don’t care about “that mandir-masjid stuff”. Voters certainly give that impression. After the 2019 Lok Sabha election, voters said in a post-poll survey that development and unemployment were the top issues for them at the time of voting. Key ‘Hindutva’ issues like cow slaughter and Ram Mandir in Ayodhya were barely on their minds, they said.
But forming an opinion based on these responses alone is naive at best. What’s more likely is that while voters do care about the material improvements, they’re voting for parties based far more on ideological lines. After all, most political parties in India do promise development; the Congress-led UPA did a better job on employment than Narendra Modi-led BJP in its first term. Despite the common refrain that “they’re all the same”, the key political antagonists in India are not the same on ideological lines, particularly religion.
In their book ‘Ideology and Identity: The Changing Party Systems of India’ published in 2018, political scientists Pradeep Chhibber and Rahul Verma demonstrated that Indian political parties and voters are strongly and consistently ideological. As part of the book’s quantitative work, they constructed an index of “the politics of recognition”, which looked at voter responses to questions relating to key issues of identity in successive rounds of post-election National Election Studies conducted by the Lokniti programme of the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies (CSDS).
The surveys asked voters for their views on the banning of cow slaughter, religious conversion and other key “core Hindutva” issues, among other questions. Chhibber and Verma then coded these responses to determine whether Congress and BJP voters were ideologically dissimilar.
The survey results are stark: BJP voters systematically supported such core Hindutva issues, while Congress voters systematically opposed them (although their opposition was far weaker than that of Left supporters).
We are deeply grateful to our readers & viewers for their time, trust and subscriptions.
Quality journalism is expensive and needs readers to pay for it. Your support will define our work and ThePrint’s future.
This trend has not changed with time; to argue then that voters in India do not care about religious hot-button issues would be disingenuous, given that their positions on these issues are strong and consistent over time, and firmly aligned with one party or the other.
Among BJP voters, all groups support these issues (which, in 2014 – the most recent year for which detailed CSDS data is available – included, for instance, that the government should not make special provisions to accommodate minorities), except their negligible Muslim support base.
Among Congress voters, on the other hand, all groups opposed these core Hindutva issues, except their small upper-caste voter base — Congress and BJP upper-caste voters were virtually indistinguishable on this count.
Since the first term of the Modi government, while older “core Hindutva” issues, including the banning of cow slaughter and religious conversion, forcefully integrating Kashmir with the mainland through the scrapping of Article 370, and building a Ram Mandir in Ayodhya have been revived, the BJP has also come up with newer core Hindutva 2.0 issues. Top among these is the Citizenship Amendment Bill (passed by the 16th Lok Sabha, but not taken up by the Rajya Sabha, and sent to a joint committee of Parliament) that seeks to grant citizenship to non-Muslim illegal immigrants.
Hindus were more likely to support than oppose the bill, while Muslims were more likely to oppose it. The intersection between religious partisanship and political partisanship on these issues is clear. In Assam, for instance, where illegal immigration and its intersection with religion is a particularly charged issue, Hindus who supported this bill overwhelmingly voted for the BJP.
Just as it is disingenuous to say that voters do not care about core Hindutva issues, another common refrain of the commentariat is equally hollow — that young people in India do not care about these issues.
Surveying only millennials (aged 15-34) in 2017, a survey found that Hindu youth strongly opposed the consumption of beef, for instance, as did BJP-supporting young people.
The voters of the future may say that they are electing leaders for jobs alone, but the revealed preferences of Indian voters have always been apparent.
The author is a Chennai-based data journalist. Views are personal.
News media is in a crisis & only you can fix it
You are reading this because you value good, intelligent and objective journalism. We thank you for your time and your trust.
You also know that the news media is facing an unprecedented crisis. It is likely that you are also hearing of the brutal layoffs and pay-cuts hitting the industry. There are many reasons why the media’s economics is broken. But a big one is that good people are not yet paying enough for good journalism.
We have a newsroom filled with talented young reporters. We also have the country’s most robust editing and fact-checking team, finest news photographers and video professionals. We are building India’s most ambitious and energetic news platform. And we aren’t even three yet.
At ThePrint, we invest in quality journalists. We pay them fairly and on time even in this difficult period. As you may have noticed, we do not flinch from spending whatever it takes to make sure our reporters reach where the story is. Our stellar coronavirus coverage is a good example. You can check some of it here.
This comes with a sizable cost. For us to continue bringing quality journalism, we need readers like you to pay for it. Because the advertising market is broken too.
If you think we deserve your support, do join us in this endeavour to strengthen fair, free, courageous, and questioning journalism, please click on the link below. Your support will define our journalism, and ThePrint’s future. It will take just a few seconds of your time.