Illustration by Soham Sen | ThePrint Team
Text Size:

If the year 2020 has taught us anything, it’s that the Bharatiya Janata Party under Prime Minister Narendra Modi is not a party of governance. It has grossly mismanaged every aspect of the coronavirus crisis: the humanitarian aspect — migrant worker crisis; the economic aspect — India is facing its worst recession since independence, and of course, the public health aspect.

Yet, there is no sign that voters are flocking back to the Congress party. What is the alternative, people ask? If the Congress had sharper leadership, it would have taken this opportunity to project itself as India’s natural party of governance, creating a wave of nostalgia for the ‘Congress years’. But it has singularly failed to do so because, beyond attacking Modi for his governance failures, it has not made clear its alternative model of governance.

And, no, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s vague homilies of ‘empowering the poor’ do not constitute an alternative model.


Also read: Why Congress has now woken up to own PV Narasimha Rao’s legacy


The Congress model of governance

The Congress already has a powerful alternative model — the UPA (United Progressive Alliance) era. But it shirks and hides from its own robust record of governance. It has ceded the centre-ground of governance to Modi, and relegated itself as a Leftist ‘party of pressure’.

There is a reason the BJP spends more time attacking the Congress’ record on governance than trumpeting its own modest achievements, even six years into its rule. The BJP has correctly calculated that as long as they sustain this myth, in popular consciousness, of the UPA period being a disastrous phase of corruption, policy paralysis and economic stagnation, it can prevent the Congress from emerging as a credible alternative.

And, astonishingly, what aids the perpetuation of this myth is the passivity of the Congress in defending its record. The shadow of the Gandhi family has almost completely obscured UPA’s governance achievements.

We are deeply grateful to our readers & viewers for their time, trust and subscriptions.

Quality journalism is expensive and needs readers to pay for it. Your support will define our work and ThePrint’s future.

SUBSCRIBE NOW

An image problem

Since Rahul Gandhi was not a part of the UPA government, the Congress leadership only owns and proclaims that part of the UPA record (NREGA, RTI, etc.) which can be claimed to be part of family benevolence.

The main leaders of the UPA have either become old or politically inactive (Manmohan Singh, Pranab Mukherjee, A.K. Antony), or do not have widespread influence to reshape popular perceptions (Anand Sharma, Jairam Ramesh, etc.), or are mired in corruption charges (P. Chidambaram). Meanwhile, Rahul Gandhi’s fashioning of the Congress as an ‘anti-establishment’ party looking to shake up the system and empower the grassroots doesn’t find any takers because Congress’ legacy of six decades of rule and Rahul’s own image are emblems of quintessential ‘insider’ privilege.

When was the last time you saw Rahul Gandhi hail the double-digit economic growth the country saw during the UPA years? Or talk about how under the UPA government, India’s exports went from $5 billion a month to $25 billion a month, at which level it has stayed for the last six years? (See graph)

Or that poverty declined by a dramatic 2.18 per cent every year under the ten years of the UPA, compared to the 0.74 per cent in the five years preceding it? Or that the average growth rate of car sales was double of what it has been under six years of the Modi government. Or that, similarly, motorcycle sales were more than double, and tractor sales were four times more during the UPA years?

How about the manifold expansion of the middle classes under the UPA, owing to rapidly rising incomes and asset prices? And the fact that the CSO data released in 2018, before it was bizarrely fudged, revealed that the economy under both UPA terms (10-year average: 8.1 per cent) outperformed the Modi government (average: 7.3 per cent)?
You can’t blame the public for not knowing these facts if the Congress never publicises them.

Indian exports | Source: (https://tradingeconomics.com/india/exports)

Also read: Rahul Gandhi and Congress party can strike a fine balance in taking on Narendra Modi


Congress’ lack of perception control

Consider this fact: in case after case that delegitimised the Congress from 2010-14 (2G scam, Coalgate etc), the judiciary has not convicted a single Congress leader of the UPA 2 government. Moreover, the judiciary has found no evidence of a massive scam, let alone the wild figures of lakhs of crores that were the figments of the imagination of a partisan CAG (Comptroller and Auditor General), who later cozied up to Modi and was duly awarded a lucrative sinecure. Yet, in public perception, the UPA years have come to be symbolic of a period of massive corruption unprecedented in India’s history, simply because the Congress has not made any efforts to reshape that perception. Unlike Modi, who went to town bandying around his ‘clean chit from the SC’ on the 2002 Gujarat riots, no Congress leader has ever publicised the fact that these judgments exonerated the party.

The main reason the Congress party needs to project itself as a centrist party of governance, rather than a Leftist party of pressure, is because that is the only way it can win back the middle-classes. The Congress has never come to power without the support of the middle-classes. Even in the 2004 elections, where the Congress victory was purely ascribed to the votes of the poor, the middle-classes supported it more than the BJP (see table).

The Congress coalition had swept metropolitan cities like Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai and Hyderabad, while some of the poorest areas in Odisha and Chhattisgarh had voted for the BJP. This wasn’t mere coincidence. In its 2004 manifesto, the Congress claimed the creation of the middle-class was its biggest achievement. And as Jairam Ramesh has noted, the Congress subtly changed its slogan from ‘Congress ka haath gareebon ke saath’ to ‘Congress ka haath aam aadmi ke saath’.

Table 1. Class wise voting | Source: Lokniti NES surveys

But what was Congress’ 2019 campaign pitch for the middle-classes? It’s hard to come up with an answer. Even the Congress manifesto was relatively silent on the middle-classes, as Arun Jaitley had noted at the time. At the same time, its NYAY scheme, on which Rahul Gandhi centred the party’s campaign, further alienated the middle-classes, while spectacularly failing to help its cause with the poor.


Also read: No cure yet for Covid, or Congress crisis. Rahul Gandhi continuously fails to win India


Disenchanted middle-class

If Rahul Gandhi thinks a coalition of the urban and rural poor could spontaneously arise without needing the middle-classes, he is living in a fantasy world. The middle-classes are critical opinion influencers who shape the ‘hawa’ (atmosphere) in favour of a party, which leads to other groups joining the coalition. This is what happened in 2012, when the middle-classes created the ‘hawa’ in favour of Modi and against the Congress. By 2014, this had become a tsunami, with all classes rallying behind Modi.

Even historically, the Congress’ coalition of the poor — Dalits, Muslims, and dominant castes in rural areas — was glued together by the ideological grounding provided by the midde-classes. These were the classes that were at the centre of Nehru’s state-led development model, and legitimised the Nehruvian consensus.

If anything, the role of the midde-classes in Indian politics has increased further over the last ten years. Not only has the size of the class expanded dramatically, along with a spike in their rates of voter turnout, their ideological role has also perhaps gained even more significance.

Table 2. Class based turnout | Source: Lokniti NES

In the book Ideology and Identity: The Changing Party Systems of India (2018), authors Rahul Verma and Pradeep Chhibber place the middle-class at the centre of Modi’s ideological coalition. Using election surveys, the book demonstrates the emergence of a large cohort of ‘economically right-leaning’ voters, driven by the expansion in the middle-class, who had overwhelmingly supported Modi. “According to some estimates, the size of the Indian middle-class grew five-fold in the last ten years and is currently around 250 million people. This demographic shift is significant because middle-class voters are more likely to be aware of the discourse around state regulations and thwarted business development,” they wrote.

Even when the middle-classes stopped supporting the Congress in 2014, there was no marked dissatisfaction with the overall nature of the economy. In a 2014 Lokniti NES survey, which asked the middle-class about their views on the state of the national economy compared to five years back, 44 per cent of the respondents said it was better or much better off, 25 per cent said it was worse or much worse off, while 23 per cent said they felt it was the same.

The Congress, unlike its response to issues of national security and corruption, has not completely lost ownership of economic issues to the BJP, on which they can base their political pitch.

An old Congress slogan comes to mind — ‘poore desh se naata hai desh chalana aata hai’ (The party has a connection with every section of society, and knows how to govern the country). The Congress needs to keep reminding voters of that image. It has certainly lost a lot of ground on cultural issues, where the BJP’s politics of majoritarianism is the new ideological consensus, as Chhibber and Verma point out. But what it can do is appeal to the material self-interests of people, and shape their perception on how to view the Congress as the original and authentic party of ‘good governance’ and ‘acche din’ (good days).

Since Rahul Gandhi’s new hobby is to make videos these days, he can start by making one about the many remarkable achievements of the UPA.

The author is a research associate at the Centre for Policy Research, New Delhi. Views are personal.

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

News media is in a crisis & only you can fix it

You are reading this because you value good, intelligent and objective journalism. We thank you for your time and your trust.

You also know that the news media is facing an unprecedented crisis. It is likely that you are also hearing of the brutal layoffs and pay-cuts hitting the industry. There are many reasons why the media’s economics is broken. But a big one is that good people are not yet paying enough for good journalism.

We have a newsroom filled with talented young reporters. We also have the country’s most robust editing and fact-checking team, finest news photographers and video professionals. We are building India’s most ambitious and energetic news platform. And we aren’t even three yet.

At ThePrint, we invest in quality journalists. We pay them fairly and on time even in this difficult period. As you may have noticed, we do not flinch from spending whatever it takes to make sure our reporters reach where the story is. Our stellar coronavirus coverage is a good example. You can check some of it here.

This comes with a sizable cost. For us to continue bringing quality journalism, we need readers like you to pay for it. Because the advertising market is broken too.

If you think we deserve your support, do join us in this endeavour to strengthen fair, free, courageous, and questioning journalism, please click on the link below. Your support will define our journalism, and ThePrint’s future. It will take just a few seconds of your time.

Support Our Journalism

15 Comments Share Your Views

15 COMMENTS

  1. Bjp bhakts have no answer for degrading economy, declining sales and tax collection with no benefit for consumer post GST (Master stroke) and havent managed to prove a single case against the congress in the courts. Still ache din.

  2. Temple bells !! For the author. Name of the author and name of this media house itself shows how biassed this article can be…. laughable

  3. Ghanta!! For the author. Name of the author and name of this media house itself shows how biassed this article can be…. laughable

  4. It is clear that congrass ruled INDIA by dividing HINDUS. It is clear congrass promoted proselytizers who ensured block votes for them. This proselytizers are delusional and believe that idol worshippers have no right to exist and such idol worshippers believing in science and education should not have any right to be free , that they should be treated as slaves as same as in pakistan . Hence anti caa protest. Hence this rhetoric for congrass rule.

  5. Wing right bourgeiose / extreme right saffrons / 34 Stalinist Nihilist bengal , ALL 3 EVIDENTLY futile fatal and utmost failed TERRORIST GOVERNMENT ACTUAL at per their own reign ,

    FORGET not indira gandhi Emergentes 2 years sikh RIOT bourgeiose bureacracy is basic premise FOR TODAY SAFFRON

  6. This is exactly the trouble with Congress. They dont own up to amazing achievements of UPA. They had 2 of finest Indian economists in Manmohan Singh and P. Chidambaram. But just because this doofus wasn’t a part of that team, they’ll soon become what Narsimha Rao has been relegated to in the Congress history.

  7. The Print team,
    Good day!!
    UPA regime is only well known for more than 44,444 scams and terror attacks by Pakistan
    This author is spreading fake news, which is against your editorial policy
    Kindly respond
    Best regards,
    Raghavan

  8. UPA performance ? What this writer is talking of ? In democratic set up voters are the ultimate judge of the performance of any ruling party . People of India has given their judgement on UPA performance in 2014 and in 2019 repeated the same .Considering their record of corruption , mismanagement of economy, undermining defense preparedness by not inducting any modern weapon system in Army , Airforce or Navy for a decade , surrendering before terrorists and making India vulnerable to threats of ISIS .ISI , Jihadis , Appeasement of minorities and constant and consistently working against the Hindus interests , voters of India had consigned the Congress party to dust bin of History. ( Not in recycle Bin ) . Every one knows and acknowledge it except some journalists living in pre-2014 period. Many journalists vouch for a leadership of a dynast . Ask the Human resource department of your media orgnisation , on which post they will place any candidate having his level of experience and achievements. A man can not manage a party full of sycophants and herd of beneficiaries of your own government s gifts . How can the same person can be trusted to manage the country as vast and as diverse as India ? India can not afford FAILURE .

  9. “Rahul Gandhi must own UPA success first” – this is just laughable.
    is The Print now publishing stand-up comedy?

  10. Rahul Gandhi doesn’t know a single thing about the UPA or Congress achievements and cannot refute anything in a logical manner. He has not mentioned how the COngress resolved the Sumdorong Chu face off with CHina, doesn’t know a thing about how UPA made made strategic purchases in defence, raised 2 MOuntain Dvns of 30000 men, activated 4 forward airfields, innovated the entire Aadhar system, made MNREGA a backbone of the poverty alleviation system, lifted over 130 million above the poverty line etc etc. He doesn’t have the intelligence to even put such achievements into cogent words and allows the BJP to hijack all these achievements as their own.

  11. There is a co-relation between your name and the title of the article. (Hint: “rule”).

    You want to rule and be ruled where as the other want to be governed.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here