A lot of key changes are taking place in the South Asian region, which has both direct and indirect bearing on not only India’s national security but also strategic interests in the long run.
One such development is the Afghan peace process and the US decision to withdraw all of its remaining troops from the war-torn country by 11 September, the 20th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, which led to their intervention in Afghanistan in search for al-Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden.
The Indian defence and security establishment is understandably worried how this will pan out. India, too, wants to sit at the high table in the Afghan peace process and not just watch from the sidelines.
This was clearly articulated in 2019 by then-Army chief and current Chief of Defence Staff General Bipin Rawat. Addressing the annual press conference, Rawat had said that India should engage with the Taliban in Afghanistan, and it cannot miss out “on joining the bandwagon” while countries led by the US engage with it. Of course, Rawat’s statement was different from the official line at the time — “no engagement with the Taliban”. His comment came a day after he had backed talks with the Taliban at the Raisina Dialogue.
I still remember the buzz his statement created in the corridors of power with several people in the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) getting upset.
Cut to 2021 and India is now slowly getting involved with the Afghan peace process. And Gen Rawat is back expressing India’s concern regarding the US pullout from Afghanistan.
Speaking at the Raisina Dialogue last week, he said, “We have concerns about Afghanistan. If the US feels that their withdrawal and a similar withdrawal by its NATO allies that we are hearing about is ultimately going to lead to peace and tranquillity, we would be happy to see such a situation emerging. But our concern is that the vacuum should not create space for other disruptors to step in”.
One would assume that India’s concern is Pakistan, which seeks to counter any Indian influence in Afghanistan.
As researcher Christian Wagner notes, in the 1990s, the Pakistani military had linked its Afghanistan relations with the Kashmir conflict. “Afghanistan is perceived under the lens of strategic depth in order to prevent an encirclement by India,” he wrote.
Former Pakistan President General Pervez Musharraf had said in 2015 that the country’s intelligence agency ISI had “cultivated” the Taliban to counter the Indians.
Also read: Quad’s careful joint statement shows India has to accept double-laning of world with China
Is Pakistan the only concern for India?
During the Q&A round at the Raisina session, General Rawat revealed another worry, without naming it.
Asked whether it was Iran and Pakistan that could exploit the situation in wake of the American pullout, the CDS said there are others too.
“Many people are looking at the opportunity to exploit the vacuum that is being created. Afghanistan is a nation which is rich in resources…there are nations that tend to exploit resources for their own benefit without the benefit going to the community of that nation”, he said adding that the international community must step in to ensure “Afghanistan is for the Afghans.”
While he did not name the country, General Rawat was clearly referring to China, which has emerged as the rogue player in global politics.
A coordinated approach by Pakistan and China could heat up the situation for India.
Also read: Can army and air force tackle climate change, pandemic? This is why diplomacy is needed
Afghanistan fits into China’s global ambitions
Those watching China closely are aware of the eyes Beijing has set on Afghanistan. Who would have thought a few years ago that in 2021, the Afghan President would term China as a factor in the regional prosperity in the same breath as India?
“We have a lot of positive relationships with China and the growth of China now is going to be the factor as growth of India for regional prosperity,” Ashraf Ghani said in an interview to CNN.
Chinese President Xi Jinping’s dream project – the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) – could well be extended into Afghanistan. The project is part of Xi’s plans for massive economic heft over other countries besides deepening partnerships in security, trade, and energy that will drive China’s growth story in years to come.
In an article in The Diplomat, journalist Sohrab Azad notes that the “primary reason Chinese investment in Afghanistan has been sluggish is due to intense instability and American presence, but those key aspects may suddenly change in the coming future.” Afghanistan’s natural resources are estimated to be worth around $1 trillion, and Chinese companies have bagged some big contracts including “a 30-year lease to extract the second largest copper deposit in the world (valued at least $50 billion) for $3.4 billion“.
Monika Chansoria, a Senior Fellow at the Japan Institute of International Affairs in Tokyo, notes that “with Beijing’s growing appetite for energy and natural resources, and consequent opening up of Afghanistan’s energy, mineral and raw materials to foreign investors, an escalatory pattern in the graph of Sino-Afghan ties has been established in the past decade.” She added that “the Chinese are likely to harvest maximum benefits by concentrating in the economic investment sector”.
Also read: As Biden shapes a new US policy, China changes tack on ties with India
The China-Pakistan factor worries India
One is sure that General Rawat is not worried about just the economic aspect of China’s increasing influence in Afghanistan.
An assessment by Yun Sun, director of the China programme and co-director of the East Asia programme at the Stimson Center, says that Beijing’s fundamental interest in Afghanistan is stability.
“Chaos in Afghanistan, from Beijing’s perspective, stokes Islamic fundamentalism that threatens domestic security in China, particularly in Xinjiang,” he noted in his article last year. He added that “with the pending American withdrawal, India’s strategic investment in Afghanistan looks to be a largely sunk cost.”
“For China, India’s failure means Pakistan’s victory. With the American exit, Pakistan is believed to have significantly more influence over events in Afghanistan, effectively alleviating its strategic vulnerability of being encircled by a hostile Afghanistan to the north and a hostile India to the south. The enhancement of Pakistan’s role in Afghanistan will not only indirectly contribute to China’s influence but also potentially improve the negotiation positions of both Islamabad and Beijing vis-à-vis Washington. Although China bears a negative and pessimistic view over the internal peace and stability of Afghanistan following the peace deal, there are some silver linings in terms of regional geopolitics,” he wrote.
Views are personal.
(Edited by Prashant Dixit)
India , pakistan nuclear sites exchange deal. India pakistan kargil war 1999 ,Vijay diwas 26 July. Have you forget Indian martyrs , Kashmir situation infiltration .
Russia came but lost and ran away!
America and its allies stepped in but lost heavily and now is scooting away!
China wants to come in to exploit the resources but thinks with Pakistan’s help can handle Taliban! No Way! The Taliban will give China a run for its money and eventually throw them out!
China has got itself trapped! I won’t wish Xi jinping good luck! “What you sow, you’ll reap!”
We are not strong enough to secure our territories, how are we going to save other’countries? All our neighbours black mail us by taking China’ name. We are putting up our resources/tax money to be their friend. Either we take over our akand bharat or let them live with their choice. Anyway we have the policy of non interference. We are helping every one and getting into trouble. Laying low should be our policy to me and build ourselves.
India is irrelevant in Afghanistan, they can only request (beg) to be allowed take any kind of role or sit on the High Table. In Hindi it says: “Parai shadi main Abdullah Dewana”.
The main point is – even if India is a part of the countries which decide future course for Afghanistan, it can do precious little in the matter. Russia, China, Iran and Pakistan will have major role in any such high tables. India should continue to do what it has been doing so far but also keep in mind that whatever we have spent so far is indeed a sunk cost. Afghans are and will remain friendly to India but that’s all about it. Keep IB and LOC safe and improve our surveillance capacity and kill every infiltrator. Until we have direct land link with Afghanistan via GB, we have very little hope of doing anything substantial in Afghanistan. With Iran now in Chinese pockets, our links to Afghanistan and Central Asia may be doubtful in future.
Don’t worry, afghani immigrants will move to China and another uighyr situation will follow.
China is like locust where ever it lands it wipes out everything on its way. Once China enters Afganistan it will control the economy and businesses of the country.
These are all very delicate matters.It is prudent to keep away from the core because our own issues are plenty and have a long way to go to be among the developed nations.
If China is getting involved ,they can as they achieved Economic stability, and also in other fields.
Our position is dicey and fickle……if we do not get FI ,then our growth is affected.
Let us concentrate on Internal issues before we get to a position to be effective.
CHARITY BEGINS AT HOME.
Chinese will definitely be in Afghanistan. Now you should see the other side.Russia,U S , have lost more than any gain. Now let’s see how Chinese will definitely,suffer. More over Chinese army is well very weak in combat operations. The Chinese will definitely loose life and, good money in Afghanistan. That will definitely create big enough problem for Pakistan and China.