What was the RSS thinking when it decided to unleash this flurry of statements, widely seen as expressing disapproval of the BJP government for its ahankaar (arrogance)?
The four instances include sarsanghachalak Mohan Bhagwat’s speech at the conclusion of the RSS workers’ training and a specific reference to ahankaar by Indresh Kumar, a member of the Sangh’s executive committee and chief patron of the RSS-backed Muslim Rashtriya Manch. Kumar said that Bhagwan Ram had punished the BJP’s arrogance by limiting it to 240 seats, way below the halfway mark. He also said the justice of Ramrajya similarly ensured that the INDIA bloc was kept even lower at 237 because it is “Ram virodhi” or anti-Ram.
Ratan Sharda, an RSS intellectual you often see articulating the organisation’s viewpoint and ideology on TV channels and in newspaper op-eds, had more specific criticism over the BJP undermining its own ideological commitment by inducting many known critics of the RSS and thereby paying the price. You can watch his interview with Sanya Dhingra of ThePrint political bureau here.
The fourth is an article in the RSS mouthpiece, Organiser, blaming the alliance with the Ajit Pawar-led NCP for the debacle in Maharashtra. Read together, these four look like the first coordinated criticism of the BJP under Narendra Modi by the RSS in the past decade.
In fact, Bhagwat in his speech counselling restraint said he’d prefer pratipaksh (the other side) to virodhi (opposition). Which brings us to our next question: What is the RSS trying to achieve? Caught in this flutter are all sides with stakes in power politics or a voice in the political debate.
First of all, it is most certainly amused by the ready celebration of its latest ‘intervention’ by the liberal side. For a community that fought the RSS ideology for decades to now find solace in its chief’s non-specific criticism is ironic as well as desperate. Even some in the Congress have expressed the same wish, partly to tease the BJP, but partly also in the belief that it will weaken Narendra Modi.
There’s been a flurry of articles and social media posts with Bhagwat’s quotes, generally saying, ‘We understand that you (Modi) won’t listen to us. But at least listen to Mohan Bhagwat.’ In this brave new post-4 June universe, the RSS chief is seen as less illiberal — and more acceptable — than the Modi-Shah BJP.
This is an incredible misreading of the situation. The fact is that occasional lovers’ tiffs have marked the history of RSS-BJP relations. These rarely change anything substantively. To think that Nagpur will bring about any change in leadership is a misreading of both its intent and its power.
This election has shown Modi’s critics that he is beatable. It will, however, need much hard work over the next five years, one state election after another, to achieve that. It can’t happen through any internal coup whatsoever, whether blessed by the RSS or not. Plus there is nothing, absolutely nothing, to suggest that the RSS is in the mood to unsettle its own government.
If they are the guru and the current BJP leadership their shishyas, see this criticism as a disappointed teacher upbraiding their favourite pupils for indifferent performance. It isn’t as if the RSS and the BJP haven’t been at odds at different points of time. We will list three. But this, after the election results, isn’t one such.
Also Read: 44 years on, two things that have changed in Modi’s BJP, and one that hasn’t
This BJP was formed in 1980 from the wreckage of the original Bharatiya Jana Sangh as the Janata Party, with which it had merged in 1977, crashed. Since then, we can see how a 20-year-itch has marked the RSS-BJP relationship. Each time, the BJP emerged chastened. Think of 1984, 2004 and now 2024.
The first, 1984, was no fault of the BJP’s. It is just that the RSS, concerned about the crisis in Punjab, was swayed by what it saw as the imperative of the national interest. In those weeks of crisis, it concluded that India was going to be more secure under Rajiv Gandhi than under another coalition government that might include the BJP. There was also that storied meeting between Rajiv and then sarsanghachalak Balasaheb Deoras.
I covered that election, especially in Madhya Pradesh and Delhi, and found the RSS workers not just absent from the BJP campaign, but often spreading the word to vote Congress for stability and rashtrahit (national interest). The RSS had no complaints with the BJP. It is just that it wasn’t its time yet.
In 1998, the RSS celebrated the rise of the first BJP-led coalition under Atal Bihari Vajpayee. His personality and temperament, however, clashed with that of then sarsanghachalak K.S. Sudarshan and by 2003, the strain was visible to all. The RSS was again less than enthusiastic in the 2004 election, which Vajpayee and Advani advanced by about five months. This is when they lost power, albeit narrowly.
Many of these irritants were underlined by Sudarshan in a two-part WalkTheTalk interview for NDTV in April 2005. To be sure, the approach for the interview had come from the sarsanghachalak’s office. I hadn’t asked for it, because RSS chiefs rarely, if ever, give interviews. Sudarshan’s tone, after Vajpayee had lost power, was ‘Serves him right. If only he had listened to us.’ By this time, the RSS had also noted the rise of a much younger leader in Narendra Modi, way more faithful to its ideology.
Fast forward another 20 years and the itch came in the run-up to the 2024 campaign. The BJP now believed that all it needed to do was campaign in Modi’s name, that it would be a one-man campaign for them by him. The RSS might have felt a little slighted, particularly at the ground level, in spite of the fact that so many aspects of the ideological project — Kashmir-Article 370, Ram Mandir, triple talaq abolition — had been achieved. Modi was also careful to give Bhagwat pride of place at the Ram Mandir consecration.
The ideology was never undermined, but the swayamsevak was just made to feel that he wasn’t so indispensable any more. Bhagwat said in his speech earlier this week that the RSS did in this election what it always does: fine-tuning public opinion. But the BJP itself had stated that it believed it had grown up and could walk on its own, without needing the RSS’s little finger to hold on to. This is where the relative indifference could have come from.
That, however, was before the results. The point is made, and it’s over. This government, the power of Modi and Shah, are indispensable for the RSS, particularly as it is set to launch its 100th anniversary celebrations. That’s why its words merely mean chastisement from a doting teacher to a favourite pupil. Reading anything more into this would be very poor judgement — and wishful thinking for Modi’s pratipaksh. Bhagwat, as we write this, is in Gorakhpur, discussing with Yogi Adityanath the next moves to strengthen the BJP in rural Uttar Pradesh.
Also Read: This BJP govt is easy to understand. If you read what Modi, Shah, Nadda read when they were young
Shekhar Gupta would like the readers to believe that Bhagwat’s remarks are a way of telling BJP leaders not to ignore RSS. As if BJP under Modi can do away with RSS, but RSS cannot. As per SG and DK Singh, Modi is too powerful to be dispensed with because most of the objectives of RSS were fulfilled under Modi. Does it mean that the arrogance, the vindictiveness, the misuse of investigation agencies, the buying of media, so many undemocratic actions are all tolerable? Isn’t it inhuman? Anyway, the power-struggle, the infighting started within BJP-RSS ranks will not subside. The peak of BJP and Modi are already gone.
RSS should read Dr Konrad elst book” decolonizing the Hindu mind””to know how it has killed RW intellectualism and forced to depend on half baked RW INTELLECTUALS LIKE Anand RANGANATHAN and Jai Deepak😭 RSS should be happy Modiji protected HINDU dharma for ten years without hurting Muslim sentiments knowing fully well nothing will please Indian Muslims than Ghaswa e hind. Modiji knows what he is doing. Let RSS run the shakasn effectively. Om shanti