Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi
File image of Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi | PTI
Text Size:

New Delhi: The former Supreme Court employee who accused Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi of sexual harassment said she will no longer participate in the proceedings of the internal committee formed to look into her complaint.

“I found the atmosphere of the committee very frightening and I was very nervous because of being confronted and questioned by three Supreme Court Judges and without even the presence of my lawyer/support person,” the woman said in her statement to the press.

The complainant’s decision comes on the third day of the inquiry proceedings. In her statement, she said she was compelled to walk out of the proceedings Tuesday because the committee did not seem to appreciate the fact that this was no ordinary complaint — this was a complaint of sexual harassment against a sitting CJI, and therefore, it was required to adopt a procedure that would ensure fairness and equality in the highly unequal circumstances she was placed in.

“I had hoped that the approach of the committee towards me would be sensitive and not one that would cause me further fear, anxiety and drama,” the 35-year-old former employee said.

“I felt I was not likely to get justice from this committee, and so I am no longer participating in the three-judge committee proceedings,” she added.

Two weeks ago, the former apex court staffer had submitted an affidavit to the sitting judges of the top court alleging that she was sexually harassed by CJI Gogoi while she was posted at his residence. However, a day after the allegations became public, CJI Gogoi assembled a special bench Saturday, 20 April, and dismissed all allegations against him.


Also read: SC order ‘fudged to help Anil Ambani’ case back under scanner in CJI Ranjan Gogoi crisis


‘Unfair proceedings’

Last week, the Supreme Court constituted an in-house committee to look into allegations of sexual harassment against CJI Gogoi. The committee is headed by Justice S.A. Bobde — the second senior-most judge at the apex court, and includes Justices Indu Malhotra and Indira Banerjee. Justice Malhotra replaced Justice N.V. Ramana, who recused himself after the complainant accused him of being a close personal friend of the CJI.

The panel met the complainant last Friday, Monday and Tuesday.

This is not the first time the ex-employee has complained about the unusual procedure adopted to look into her complaint. Despite the fact that the panel was not constituted as per the Vishakha Guidelines or the Sexual Harassment of Women at the Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal Act) Act (‘POSH Act’), she joined the proceedings “in good faith”.

However, she said she was not allowed to bring her lawyer while the proceedings were on. She also objected to there being no video or audio recording of the proceedings, as well as her claim that she has not been apprised of the procedure that the inquiry committee has adopted to look into her complaint, nor has she been supplied with a copy of her statements as recorded till now.

“I have not been informed if the committee has sought any response from the CJI to my complaint and I have been left guessing and anxious on all these matters,” she said.

The former employee claimed her request for call details of the number through which she interacted with the CJI were also not called for. “The same application was finally taken by the committee on 30 April 2019, when feeling helpless and distressed I could no longer continue to participate in the committee hearings,” she said.

‘Undue stress’

The woman submitted that due to stress she is suffering from impaired hearing in one ear.

“As a result of this, I was sometimes unable to hear what was being dictated by Hon’ble Justice Bobde to the court official as a record of my statements before the committee. Further, the committee declined my request for video recording of the committee proceedings. I was also clearly told that no lawyer/support person could be present with me during the committee hearing. I was orally instructed that I should not disclose the proceedings of the committee to the media and was to not even share the proceedings with my lawyer, advocate Vrinda Grover,” she said.

The woman claimed that following the conclusion of the proceedings, she was being followed “by two men on a motorcycle whose partial number” she was able to note.

She has repeatedly requested the proceedings to be treated as a formal inquiry and not a departmental one. But her requests, so far, have not been heeded.


Also read: Another lawyer claims conspiracy against CJI Gogoi, says SC advocates trying to defame him


Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Why news media is in crisis & How you can fix it

You are reading this because you value good, intelligent and objective journalism. We thank you for your time and your trust.

You also know that the news media is facing an unprecedented crisis. It is likely that you are also hearing of the brutal layoffs and pay-cuts hitting the industry. There are many reasons why the media’s economics is broken. But a big one is that good people are not yet paying enough for good journalism.

We have a newsroom filled with talented young reporters. We also have the country’s most robust editing and fact-checking team, finest news photographers and video professionals. We are building India’s most ambitious and energetic news platform. And have just turned three.

At ThePrint, we invest in quality journalists. We pay them fairly. As you may have noticed, we do not flinch from spending whatever it takes to make sure our reporters reach where the story is.

This comes with a sizable cost. For us to continue bringing quality journalism, we need readers like you to pay for it.

If you think we deserve your support, do join us in this endeavour to strengthen fair, free, courageous and questioning journalism. Please click on the link below. Your support will define ThePrint’s future.

Support Our Journalism

7 Comments Share Your Views

7 COMMENTS

  1. Many People think that any person form the North East states holding top post can be harassed and defame by alleging any fake issues. But law of the land is same for all. without doubt I can say that if she could not face inquiry she is just attempt to tarnish the image of Gogoi and the entire North East People. She must face the trial. Why should she withdraw now.

  2. This woman cannot answer the judges’ questions because her complaint itself is shaky – – this she is twisting into saying that she is feeling intimidated. Now her lawyer will appear for her and show his/her creativity in fielding questions. A farce is going to play out hence onwards in this case.

    If the complainant is feeling intimidated by being in the PRESENCE of big judges, then this can be tried : let her sit comfortably in a separate room, ALONE, and let the questions be put to her through a speaker, in a sweet voice, not of any of the judges’, and let her reply through a microphone. I bet she won’t be able to reply and still want her lawyer to answer on her behalf.

  3. First there is no complaint as per due process but writing to all judges of SC. Then tale of Kafkaesque conspiracy, then why there is only one lady on the panel, then why is a judge who used to frequently visit CJI’s residence on the panel, then now that there are 2 women judges on a panel of 3, complain about getting intimidated. When you have worked as assistant to CJI, how can you get intimidated by other judges ? Surely all these provide reasonable grounds to doubt her motive. How is this justice for CJI – can anyone make a character destroying charge and get away? Even then court must do everything to get a closure in which there is either guilt or innocence of CJI is proven beyond reasonable doubt. There is a lesson for SC in this – when you do things like holding a press conference about internal matters of SC, you lose the gravitas of an institution like SC. After that anybody thinks they can getaway by saying anything.

  4. Free and fair atmosphere should be given to the complainant with her council. It is very difficult for her to deal with three member committee without the council.

  5. If SC CJI cannot file FIR against her for misconduct blackmail and corruption she will go on with such dramatics to compel him to resign as per the plan conspiracy hatched by a gang of Lawyers and Congressman.Kapil sibal Prashant bhushan and Rahul Gandhi re involved in the deep rotted conspiracy.The media like QUINT PRINT WIRE SCROLL CARAVAN are all involved in making mockery of SC.
    TIME for SC to withdraw the Lawyers License to all who conspired against CJI.
    Time to file FIR against the Woman for misconduct blackmail and corruption.
    Imposition of huge penalty on all vexatious petition file by ML Sharma and P Bhushan
    ELSE CJI GOGOI should Resign forthwith taking moral responsibility

  6. Very unfortunate. One cannot think of a more judicious forum than three judges – including two women – of the apex court. They deal with issues of far greater import each working day. It does not matter whether they are acting judicially or administratively, since acting with integrity and impartiality is common to both situations. Ms Vrinda Grover is a respected figure. If her presence gives the complainant a sense of not being overawed, perhaps that could be allowed. In any case, this issue merits swift, credible closure.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here