Delhi High Court
Representational image | Delhi High Court | Twitter: @ANI
Text Size:

New Delhi: The Delhi Police has submitted before the high court tweets calling for the release of activist Devangana Kalita and some “opinionated” news articles to justify a “brief note” that was shared with the media on 2 June to divulge crucial information on evidence collected against her.

The police’s submission, filed in an affidavit earlier this week (6 July), was in response to a petition by Kalita seeking directions to authorities to not leak any allegations made against her to the media.

The Pinja Tod activist has been named in four FIRs for allegedly participating in protests at Darya Ganj last year and for her alleged role in the anti-CAA agitation in Jafrabad in February 2020.

Kalita had earlier alleged that the Crime Branch of Delhi Police has been “selectively leaking” information on the allegations against her and the evidence collected so far.

She had asserted that such an act has caused immense damage to her reputation and fundamental right to a fair trial as well as a presumption of innocence.

She had also sought directions to the police to withdraw allegations made in the “brief note” it had shared with the media on 2 June.

Following her plea, the Delhi High Court had on 10 June restrained the police from issuing any statement to the media or on any social media platforms on those accused in the Northeast Delhi riots cases.

We are deeply grateful to our readers & viewers for their time, trust and subscriptions.

Quality journalism is expensive and needs readers to pay for it. Your support will define our work and ThePrint’s future.


The court had also asked the concerned DCP of the Crime Branch to file a personal affidavit affirming whether any such information had been shared by the crime branch officials with journalists.

In response, DCP G. Ram Gopal Naik however said the note was to “put things in the right perspective” and to “satisfy the right of the citizen to know about the affairs of the society, and the right of the journalist to ensure an informed society”.

The Delhi Police’s affidavit also asserted that Kalita had started a “media trial” to gain public sympathy.

It accused Kalita “guilty of peddling a false social media narrative of state-sponsored oppression and subjugation against a particular community which incited the Delhi riots”.

The affidavit also makes her “guilty of peddling a false narrative of a political vendetta, state-sponsored pogrom, persecution and malicious prosecution against the said community”.

In order to bolster its submissions, the Delhi Police has referred to tweets made through Pinjra Tod’s Twitter account, and over 50 news articles.

Also read: Tahir Hussain planned IB staffer Ankit Sharma’s murder: Delhi Police in new chargesheet

Tweets, ‘opinionated’ news articles

The first tweet in the Delhi Police’s affidavit is by independent data researcher Srinivas Kodali, with the screenshot of a statement issued by the Pinjra Tod, condemning the arrests of Kalita and Natasha Narwal, also a member of the collective.

Another tweet, dated 24 May, called for immediate release of the two activities, and asserted that “criminalisation of dissent and persecution of democratic activists” must be stopped.

On 26 May, Pinjra Tod had called for a “Twitter storm” demanding the release of all arrested “anti-CAA activists and political prisoners”, through use of the hashtags #ReleaseAllPoliticalPrisoners and #StopArrestingStudents.

On 2 June, Pinjra Tod had called for a “nationwide protest against repression on anti-CAA protestors”, with the headline: “Sab Yaad Rakha Jaega”.

Referring to these tweets, the Delhi Police’s affidavit said they were aimed at “projecting the petitioner and her associates as victims of state subjugation so that she could gain sympathy in the eyes of the public and could influence and swing public opinion in (her) favour”.

The affidavit also lists 53 news articles, which it said contained “unverified, speculative and opinionated content”. The articles belonged to various news outlets, including The Wire,, The Leaflet, The New Indian Express, News18 and ThePrint.

‘Unwarranted’ allegations

The affidavit, however, did not sit well with Justice Vibhu Bakhru of the HC who said the police should have shown “some restraint”.

During a hearing Thursday, the court asserted that allegations made in the affidavit were “unwarranted” in view of the limited scope of the petition, which was to examine under what circumstances the police can issue official communiques or press notes about a case and in what manner.

“We cannot allow this kind of affidavit on record unless someone takes responsibility,” the court said, adding that some of the allegations in the affidavit were made irresponsibly.

The court also rapped the police for saying that since Kalita wanted a media trial, it was justified in sharing the information with the media. Justice Bakhru suggested that the document filed in the court be withdrawn.

Additional Solicitor General Aman Lekhi then told the court that he will not rely on the affidavit and will confine his arguments to the point of law being discussed. Following this, the matter was posted for hearing on 15 July.

Also read: Police didn’t inform Delhi riots accused of serious charges, violated procedure: Lawyers


Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

News media is in a crisis & only you can fix it

You are reading this because you value good, intelligent and objective journalism. We thank you for your time and your trust.

You also know that the news media is facing an unprecedented crisis. It is likely that you are also hearing of the brutal layoffs and pay-cuts hitting the industry. There are many reasons why the media’s economics is broken. But a big one is that good people are not yet paying enough for good journalism.

We have a newsroom filled with talented young reporters. We also have the country’s most robust editing and fact-checking team, finest news photographers and video professionals. We are building India’s most ambitious and energetic news platform. And we aren’t even three yet.

At ThePrint, we invest in quality journalists. We pay them fairly and on time even in this difficult period. As you may have noticed, we do not flinch from spending whatever it takes to make sure our reporters reach where the story is. Our stellar coronavirus coverage is a good example. You can check some of it here.

This comes with a sizable cost. For us to continue bringing quality journalism, we need readers like you to pay for it. Because the advertising market is broken too.

If you think we deserve your support, do join us in this endeavour to strengthen fair, free, courageous, and questioning journalism, please click on the link below. Your support will define our journalism, and ThePrint’s future. It will take just a few seconds of your time.

Support Our Journalism

Share Your Views


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here