Monday, February 6, 2023
HomeJudiciaryCJI Bobde writes to Modi govt seeking info on gay lawyer's elevation...

CJI Bobde writes to Modi govt seeking info on gay lawyer’s elevation as judge within 4 weeks

CJI Bobde has also asked Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad to give more clarity on the central govt's objection to Saurabh Kirpal’s name.

Text Size:

New Delhi: Chief Justice of India (CJI) S.A. Bobde has written a letter to the central government, giving it four weeks to provide additional information on advocate Saurabh Kirpal whose name was recommended for elevation as a judge of the Delhi High Court in 2017.

The letter, sources told ThePrint, was written almost two weeks ago, following a collegium meet on 2 March that deliberated on Kirpal’s name.

ThePrint had on 7 March reported about the collegium’s decision to write to the Centre, asking it to send expeditiously additional inputs on Kirpal, which the previous collegium had requisitioned, so that a final decision could be taken soon on his elevation.

Kirpal’s name was discussed during the 2 March meeting between CJI Bobde and the two other collegium members — Justices N.V. Ramana and R.F. Nariman — but the collegium deferred its decision until it received inputs from the government.

This was the fourth time Kirpal’s name was deferred ever since he was unanimously recommended by the Delhi High Court collegium in October 2017.

His name was among 18 of the 23 proposals, pending with the collegium for long, that were taken up on 2 March. These included some names that were sent back by the Centre for reconsideration and those that were deferred by the collegium earlier for want of more information on the candidates.

CJI Bobde seeks clarity

Sources in SC told ThePrint that CJI Bobde has, through his letter, asked Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad to give more clarity on the government’s objection to Kirpal’s name.

The Supreme Court has been unable to take a concrete decision on Kirpal’s appointment, even though it had in September 2018 read down Section 377, which criminalised consensual sex between homosexual adults.

In an interview to ThePrint last September, Kirpal, who is gay, had said he believes that his sexual orientation is probably the reason why the three-member Supreme Court collegium has not taken a decision on his elevation. It was the first time the advocate had spoken out on the issue.

The government has officially not spoken against Kirpal’s sexual orientation, but had expressed reservation over his partner being a foreigner. This was highlighted in the Intelligence Bureau (IB) report, which the government had forwarded to the SC collegium after it received the recommendation on Kirpal from the Delhi High Court in October 2017.

The IB had trawled through Kirpal’s Facebook account and attached his picture with his “foreign” partner. None of the pictures were offensive or objectionable, though, and there was no direct objection to his elevation. However, the IB report had said that the lawyer’s foreign partner could pose a security risk.

This IB report was considered on 1 April 2019 by a collegium then led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi and comprising present CJI Bobde and Justice Ramana, who will take over as the next CJI on 23 April.

It had then deferred its decision, for the third time, preferring to seek additional information from the government in the wake of IB inputs on Kirpal.

“In view of an earlier collegium opinion to seek more information about him, the (current) collegium during its meeting on 2 March felt it would be appropriate to wait for the inputs. The CJI suggested writing a letter to the Centre,” the source added.

CJI Bobde’s letter to the law minister also reminds him of the earlier letter sent to him pursuant to the April 2019 collegium meet.

Also read: Modi govt took nearly a year to clear 24 names for HC judge appointments in 4 states

Four-week deadline

As decided by the current collegium, CJI Bobde has given a four-week deadline to the government to respond.

“It was the collegium that unanimously agreed not to wait for long. The members were of the view that if the government fails to respond within a reasonable period, then the collegium should move on with its decision,” the source added.

However, a meeting in the immediate future is bleak, considering CJI Bobde is set to demit office on 23 April. “There is no rule that prohibits the outgoing CJI to convene the collegium, but as per the convention the CJI who is about to retire prefers not to preside over such meetings,” said the source.

(Edited by Neha Mahajan)

Also read: Supreme Court suggests using ad-hoc judges to fill high court vacancies, tackle pending cases


Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism


  1. Why is the judiciary being coerced by the news media.. Marketing overkill is has becoming a social poison..

  2. Collegium : damn, what sort of judiciary system is this? It is like a gang of thugs selecting their gang members. Please have all india level exam to select SC judges and only high court judges are eligible.

  3. The headline gives a feeling that the decision of Union due to his Sexual orientation.A long news report which somewhere gives resson for the decision.Misleading headline.Improve the reporting.Be precise.

  4. Sir, kindly tell me about the status of my name for the elevation as high Court Judge.y name has been cleared Punjab & Haryana High Court Collegium Committee & was Sent to the appropriate authorities in New Delhi. My name is Paramjit Singh Walia. My mobile no. is 9417181151. Thanks you. An early action in the matter will be highly appreciated.

Comments are closed.

Most Popular