Supreme Court
File image of the Supreme Court of India | Photo: Manisha Mondal | ThePrint
Text Size:

New Delhi: The Supreme Court Friday said it will look into whether a court can impose restrictions on social media usage while granting bail to a person charged with a criminal case.

A bench led by Chief Justice S.A. Bobde issued notices to the central and Uttar Pradesh (UP) governments in a petition filed by Congress leader Sachin Chaudhary, who has challenged the UP High Court’s order granting him bail in a sedition case.

Chaudhary was arrested on 11 April and charged with sedition, among other criminal provisions, after he questioned the state government’s handling of the Covid-19 pandemic and the migrant crisis.

The 20 May bail order has restrained Chaudhary from using social media, while being released on bail and till the conclusion of trial in his case.

During the hearing, CJI Bobde however observed that the high court’s approach did not seem unreasonable to prevent further mischief.

“We don’t think it is too onerous. If a person’s participation on social media creates mischief, why can’t the court say you don’t use the instrument by which you caused mischief?” the CJI said.

Also read: Tweets, ‘opinionated’ articles part of Delhi Police’s media trial allegations against activist

We are deeply grateful to our readers & viewers for their time, trust and subscriptions.

Quality journalism is expensive and needs readers to pay for it. Your support will define our work and ThePrint’s future.


‘Allegations not related to social media use’

Chaudhary was also slapped with sections under the Information Technology Act, including the repealed 66A and the Disaster Management Act, 2005.

UP High Court judge Justice Siddharth granted bail to Chaudhary keeping in view the “larger mandate under Article 21 of the Constitution, which deals with the right to life and liberty”.

The other bail conditions require Chaudhary to not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses, cooperate in the trial and not indulge in any criminal activity.

During the hearing before the Supreme Court, Chaudhary’s lawyer, senior advocate Sushil Khurshid, told the bench that there were no allegations against his client relating to misuse of social media. Therefore, Khurshid argued, the bail condition restricting use of social media was not justified.

Also read: Pacts with industry bodies, helpdesks, job schemes: UP tells SC about steps taken for migrants


Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

News media is in a crisis & only you can fix it

You are reading this because you value good, intelligent and objective journalism. We thank you for your time and your trust.

You also know that the news media is facing an unprecedented crisis. It is likely that you are also hearing of the brutal layoffs and pay-cuts hitting the industry. There are many reasons why the media’s economics is broken. But a big one is that good people are not yet paying enough for good journalism.

We have a newsroom filled with talented young reporters. We also have the country’s most robust editing and fact-checking team, finest news photographers and video professionals. We are building India’s most ambitious and energetic news platform. And we aren’t even three yet.

At ThePrint, we invest in quality journalists. We pay them fairly and on time even in this difficult period. As you may have noticed, we do not flinch from spending whatever it takes to make sure our reporters reach where the story is. Our stellar coronavirus coverage is a good example. You can check some of it here.

This comes with a sizable cost. For us to continue bringing quality journalism, we need readers like you to pay for it. Because the advertising market is broken too.

If you think we deserve your support, do join us in this endeavour to strengthen fair, free, courageous, and questioning journalism, please click on the link below. Your support will define our journalism, and ThePrint’s future. It will take just a few seconds of your time.

Support Our Journalism

1 Comment Share Your Views


  1. The Print should read out the section 66a of IT act 2000… than reconsider the article described above..😡😡😡


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here