Representational image of social media apps | Alexander Bahena | Pixabay
Representational image of social media apps | Alexander Bahena | Pixabay
Text Size:

New Delhi: The Army’s updated list of banned social media applications, 89 of them, including TikTok, WeChat, Facebook and Instagram, has been challenged by a serving Army officer on the grounds that it is “unconstitutional” and has come by way of an executive order.

ThePrint was the first to report that the Army last month came up with the updated list of 89 apps, many of which were developed in China, to be banned for use by service personnel.

The Army also directed all personnel to delete their Facebook accounts by 1 June this year. Those still using Facebook or any of the other banned sites after 15 July will be reported, the communication stated.

In a petition filed in the Delhi High Court, Lieutenant Colonel P.K. Choudhary had sought withdrawal of the new policy on the grounds that it was “arbitrary executive action”.

The matter is likely to come up for hearing Tuesday.

Speaking to ThePrint, a senior Army officer said the ban was implemented to primarily curb the increased number of honey traps being set up for defence personnel on social media.


Also read: Army to change 2005 policy to cope with media boom, Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp explosion

We are deeply grateful to our readers & viewers for their time, trust and subscriptions.

Quality journalism is expensive and needs readers to pay for it. Your support will define our work and ThePrint’s future.

SUBSCRIBE NOW


What the petition argues

The petition stated the withdrawal would ensure that the fundamental rights of the armed forces are not amended, abrogated or modified by such an arbitrary action, which “offends provisions of Army Act and Rules” and is “unconstitutional”.

The plea said the ban is a violation of Article 33 of the Constitution and also Section 21 of the Army Act, 1950, provisions of which cannot be nullified by an executive order.

The petitioner further stated that he believed that such a ban violated fundamental rights, including the right to freedom of speech and expression and the right to privacy.

The petition mentioned that soldiers of the Indian Army serve in remote areas and extreme weather conditions which adversely affects their physical and mental health. Thus they rely on social media and networking sites to stay connected with family and loved ones.

It further said that the move to ban these sites for soldiers serving in various far flung areas of the country and asking them to delete their accounts on Facebook is “illegal, arbitrary, disproportionate, violates the fundamental rights of Soldiers, including but not limited to the freedom of speech and expression, the right to life and the right to privacy.”

“Therefore, the act of banning usage and directing deletion of accounts of soldiers from social networking platforms that the policy intends to enforce is a clear violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India,” the petition said.

It further states that there is an attempt to abrogate fundamental rights of the soldiers vide an executive order, and called it an attack on the dignity of serving and retired soldiers.


Also read: Indian Army asking officers to stay away from Facebook a knee-jerk, ineffective diktat


‘Ban for Army personnel a selective application’

Advocate Shivank Pratap Singh, who is leading the case, told ThePrint that the Army’s directive was in violation of the right to equality because sensitive information not just lies with Army jawans and officers but also with members of civil society, politicians and civil servants.

“So why is it being selectively applied to Indian Armed Forces personnel? Moreover, the way in which the policy has been formulated is wrong. Also, it denies the civil liberties to soldiers who are willing to fight and die for their country,” Singh said.

An Army officer had earlier told ThePrint that the threat perception is regularly reassessed and new vulnerabilities are highlighted and updated lists are sent across all commands and units based on cyber security assessments carried out at various levels quarterly, half yearly and annually.

Following a spy ring bust last year, the Navy had also banned and restricted 85 applications, including Facebook, Instagram, WeChat, Viber, Tumblr, Reddit and Truecaller.

The Indian Air Force is yet to come out with a similar list, but has a social media policy in place.


Also Read: Army tells personnel to stay away from spiritual ‘babas’ as they could be Pakistani agents


 

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

News media is in a crisis & only you can fix it

You are reading this because you value good, intelligent and objective journalism. We thank you for your time and your trust.

You also know that the news media is facing an unprecedented crisis. It is likely that you are also hearing of the brutal layoffs and pay-cuts hitting the industry. There are many reasons why the media’s economics is broken. But a big one is that good people are not yet paying enough for good journalism.

We have a newsroom filled with talented young reporters. We also have the country’s most robust editing and fact-checking team, finest news photographers and video professionals. We are building India’s most ambitious and energetic news platform. And we aren’t even three yet.

At ThePrint, we invest in quality journalists. We pay them fairly and on time even in this difficult period. As you may have noticed, we do not flinch from spending whatever it takes to make sure our reporters reach where the story is. Our stellar coronavirus coverage is a good example. You can check some of it here.

This comes with a sizable cost. For us to continue bringing quality journalism, we need readers like you to pay for it. Because the advertising market is broken too.

If you think we deserve your support, do join us in this endeavour to strengthen fair, free, courageous, and questioning journalism, please click on the link below. Your support will define our journalism, and ThePrint’s future. It will take just a few seconds of your time.

Support Our Journalism

1 Comment Share Your Views

1 COMMENT

  1. Dear sir there should be correction in your ..the army officer is only fighting for social media app which is Facebook..not for tiktok, uc browser, Camscanner etc..he is also against toChinese apps but not to Facebook.. Please work hard on your work don’t miss guide like Aaj tak..bahut gussa Aaya aapki ye news read kr k..bahut si aapki news achi hoti hai ..so please isse correct kre..I’m also a serving shoulder..aapko pta hai aapki iss news ki wajah say logo ko lgega ki army officer pro china hai ..wo sirf Facebook ki baat kr raha hai..tiktok, uc browser , Camscanner ki nhi..

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here