The four men convicted for the 16 December 2012 Delhi gangrape | Image: Arindam Mukherjee | ThePrint
The four convicts who were hanged Friday morning | Image ThePrint
Text Size:

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court Wednesday rejected the central government’s plea seeking to execute the four convicts in the 16 December 2012 gang-rape and murder case separately. It also laid down a 7-day deadline for the convicts to exhaust all their legal remedies, including mercy plea.

The government had moved the petition as legal remedies being sought by two of the convicts to commute death penalty were delaying the execution of the others.

Justice Suresh Kait was urged in a special Sunday hearing by the home ministry that a lower court order staying the execution of the four until further orders should be set aside as the convicts were using the law to delay the death sentence.

On Wednesday, Kait said the high court would not interfere in the lower court order passed by Additional Sessions Judge Dharmendra Rana. “Upto the Supreme Court the fate of all the four has been decided by a single order. I am thus of the opinion that all their death warrants should be executed together,” he said.

The judge added that since the convicts have adopted delaying tactics, all four have to “exercise their legal remedies within 7 days, after which the court expects the authorities to act as per the law”.

Pointing towards the delay, Kait said he had no hesitation to hold that all the convicts waited, “for reasons best known to them”, to file their review petitions after more than 150 days.

“Akshay filed his review after delay of more than 900 days,” Kait said.

The Delhi High Court Sunday had reserved its verdict on the Centre’s plea challenging stay on the execution of the four death-row convicts. The moot question before the court was can the convicts be hanged separately though convicted in the same offence.

The centre had challenged a lower court order that had stayed the execution of the four convicts — Akshay Thakur, Mukesh Singh, Pawan Gupta, and Vinay Sharma — on 1 February until further orders.

At present, Pawan is yet to file curative and mercy plea and a reply to Akshay’s mercy plea is awaited. Mukesh and Vinay have exhausted all legal options.

Also read: India needs to abolish death penalty, and not hang 2012 Delhi gangrape convicts


Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Why news media is in crisis & How you can fix it

India needs free, fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism even more as it faces multiple crises.

But the news media is in a crisis of its own. There have been brutal layoffs and pay-cuts. The best of journalism is shrinking, yielding to crude prime-time spectacle.

ThePrint has the finest young reporters, columnists and editors working for it. Sustaining journalism of this quality needs smart and thinking people like you to pay for it. Whether you live in India or overseas, you can do it here.

Support Our Journalism

1 Comment Share Your Views


  1. The verdict, in my humble view, defies logic. If all the convicts are to be hanged together, how their mercy pleas as well as curative and other appeals were herd separately? If a single convict has resorted to his legal options by moving the appropriate court, he should not have been entertained and asked to approach that court collectively. There is a legal mismatch here. Why has the judiciary allowed the convicts to exhaust their legal remedies one by one and not asked them to come collectively?


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here