Cover page of the book 'Delhi Riots 2020: The Untold Story' | bloomsbury.com | ThePrint
Cover page of the book 'Delhi Riots 2020: The Untold Story' | bloomsbury.com | ThePrint
Text Size:

New Delhi: Bloomsbury India’s decision to withdraw a book on the Delhi riots at the last minute has led to an uproar on social media, with writers of all ideological persuasions criticising the publishing house for attempting to stifle the voice of authors it may not agree with.

From Principal Economic Advisor Sanjeev Sanyal to filmmaker Anurag Kashyap, Bloomsbury India has come under attack from all quarters after its decision to withdraw publication of the book, Delhi Riots 2020: The Untold Story, by Monika Arora, Sonali Chitalkar and Prerna Malhotra.

The publishers’ decision came after the virtual launch of the book, which alleges that the February 2020 Delhi riots were the result of a planned conspiracy, triggered a controversy Friday.

In its statement, the publishing house said, “Bloomsbury India had planned to release Delhi Riots 2020: The Untold Story in September, a book purportedly giving a factual report on the riots in Delhi in February 2020, based on investigations and interviews conducted by the authors. However, in view of very recent events including a virtual pre-publication launch organised without our knowledge by the authors, with participation by parties of whom the Publishers would not have approved, we have decided to withdraw publication of the book.”

It, however, added, “Bloomsbury India strongly supports freedom of speech but also has a deep sense of responsibility towards society.”

Taking to Twitter Saturday against the decision, Sanjeev Sanyal said he would never publish his works with Bloomsbury again. Calling the incident an act of “ideological censorship”, he said, “A few weeks ago, I had raised the issue of how a tiny cabal controls Indian publishing and constantly imposes ideological censorship. We have just witnessed one example of how this insidious control is wielded.”

Kashyap, who has been at the forefront of criticism against Right-wing writers and filmmakers, said, “Banning anything is suppressing freedom of expression.”

“A book is an idea, one you may staunchly agree or disagree with. And an idea cannot be destroyed. It cannot fall victim to threats and blackmail by fascists. Books last because ideas do.This decision by Bloomsbury should be condemned by ALL writers and readers,” author Anand Ranganathan tweeted Saturday night.

He also said he will return the advance for his next publication if this particular book was not released by Bloomsbury.

Author Sandeep Deo also announced that he was withdrawing all his books from Bloomsbury.

Retired IAS officer and author Sanjay Dixit announced that he has terminated his contract with Bloomsbury India for his yet-to-be-released book.

When asked about the threats posed by several authors over its decision, Kunal Jalali, publicity manager at Bloomsbury India, told ThePrint, “Our statement remains the same. We have nothing to add to what is being said right now.”

Jalali also said decisions to publish books are taken by the company’s management “consisting of its publishing head and the apex team”.


Also read: Congratulations liberals, for another self-goal in forcing Bloomsbury on Delhi riots book


‘This is fascism’

The book’s virtual launch by its authors Friday had triggered a row as BJP MLA Kapil Mishra, whose provocative speech is alleged to be among the primary triggers of the Delhi riots, was invited as its guest of honour.

Other panelists included BJP leader Bhupendra Yadav, OpIndia editor Nupur Sharma and filmmaker Vivek Agnihotri.

Following Bloomsbury’s decision to withdraw the book, Mishra had lashed out at critics who created a storm over his planned participation at the launch.

“They are scared of what will happen if the book is published, or what will happen when it will come out in the market… what will happen when the people will read the book,” he had said.

Kanchan Gupta, a distinguished fellow at the Observer Research Foundation, called Bloomsbury’s decision “fascist” and belonging to the “cancel culture”.

Among others who objected to Bloomsbury’s decision was author Amish Tripathi. In his tweet, Tripathi said, “Deplatforming is as bad as burning a book.”


Also read: The idea of ‘safe spaces’ has turned on itself to exclude everyone who dares to differ


 

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Why news media is in crisis & How you can fix it

India needs free, fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism even more as it faces multiple crises.

But the news media is in a crisis of its own. There have been brutal layoffs and pay-cuts. The best of journalism is shrinking, yielding to crude prime-time spectacle.

ThePrint has the finest young reporters, columnists and editors working for it. Sustaining journalism of this quality needs smart and thinking people like you to pay for it. Whether you live in India or overseas, you can do it here.

Support Our Journalism

VIEW COMMENTS

3 COMMENTS

  1. Interesting article but how does it make ThePrint any different. You pulled out the video on YouTube by Shekhar Gupta this morning on the above subject.

  2. Left wing fascism has made Bloomsbury back out. It’s nothing but censorship and book banning of those whom you don’t agrre with .

  3. This action by Bloomsbury, bowing to the pressure from the liberals, the progressives, the secular and whatever else they self certify themselves as, proves the Fareed Zakaria was absolutely right. Talking of the Left and the Liberals in CNN in 2017, he had said – “It’s an attitude of self-righteousness that says we are so pure, we’re so morally superior, we cannot bear to hear an idea with which we disagree. Liberals think they are tolerant but often they aren’t.”

Comments are closed.