New Delhi: A group of citizens, including retired judges, lawyers and bureaucrats, has slammed those criticising the Supreme Court order holding senior lawyer Prashant Bhushan guilty of contempt of court and raised concern over the emerging trend of “browbeating and intimidating the judiciary”.
The group of 772 citizens, in a letter to the Chief Justice of India (CJI), said that India has witnessed a series of attacks by institutional disruptors against judges who are unwilling to agree with them and toe the line drawn by them. The Supreme Court had, in its judgment on August 14 this month, held Prashant Bhushan guilty of criminal contempt of court over his tweets. The apex court had fixed for August 20 hearing arguments on sentencing in the case.
“It is unfortunate that when political ends of lawyers are not served by a decision of the court, they vilify the court by making scandalizing remarks. The Supreme Court of India as well as the judges are subject to both scurrilous language, malicious attacks and scandalizing remarks,” the group said in the letter.
It said that legitimate criticism of both judgements and the functioning of the institution has always existed, however, when the criticism is calculated and actuated by malice, the authority of the court is undermined.
“If the judiciary is to perform its duties and functions effectively, it is essential to protect the dignity and authority of the courts. The foundation of the judiciary is the confidence of the people in its ability to deliver justice. The actions of these institutional disruptors through name calling and usage of certain phrases such as ‘Supreme Court has destroyed democracy’; ‘the Supreme Court is killing the Constitution’ have the tendency to destroy the faith of the public in the judiciary,” the statement said.
“We sincerely hope that the Supreme Court of India ensures that such persons are dealt with in an exemplary manner, even if such actions are taken thirteen years later or else such trends will only accelerate and strike a blow to the guardian of the rule of law,” the group said urging the CJI to uphold the edifice of the judicial system and protect the third pillar of the democracy from those who peddle falsehood to destroy the institution.
Reportedly, the group had earlier submitted a plea to President Ram Nath Kovind claiming that “stray groups with hidden political agendas” cannot be allowed to denigrate democratic institutions. (ANI)
Also read:India turned a blind eye to Justice Karnan, an ‘outsider’. Prashant Bhushan is different
Prasa prashant is correct.
Shekhar Gupta has lost the sapience rather sagacity in these days of BJP rule . I think out of the frustration only such errors precipitate, the title and content of the article are 180 degree apart. Blunder! Or a deliberate mistake.
Ever since UPA came to power, there is a group of lawyers who are politically influential who have been bringing pressure on the Apex Court to hear matters urgently, or conduct a media campaign to influence the public opinion, create drama in the court room, file petitions after, petitions, review after review petitions, move frivolous applications, seek urgent out of turn hearing of cases of their preferences, prevailing upon court to give priority to politically sensitive cases. After NDA came to power, this group of disruptive lawyers has been working on war footing. There is widespread criticism that the supreme court has not time for hearing ordinary litigants, but gives priority to Rafael or Rohingya or Yakub Memons.
Prashant Bhushan has done yoeman service in exposing corruption. There can be no doubt. But, there has to be a method for madness. As a lawyer, he ought to have used legal tools for questioning the probity of judges, if that were his goal. But, trying to forcefully express himself in 140 characrer limit of Twitter has got him into trouble.
Title of the story and its content almost seem like opposites. Titles must better reflect the content
Exactly. I am confused.