Monday, January 30, 2023
HomeIndiaModi – what India missed in Time magazine’s 2019 list of 100...

Modi – what India missed in Time magazine’s 2019 list of 100 influential people

PM Modi was not included for the 2nd year running and even through the course of the 3 times he did make it, the magazine had changed its assessment of him.

Text Size:

New Delhi: When Time Magazine published its list of the 100 most influential people in the world last month, it made news in India for the three names that made it to the list – business leader Mukesh Ambani, and the public interest litigators behind decriminalisation of homosexuality in India, Arundhati Katju and Menaka Guruswamy.

What, however, has gone unnoticed is the fact that Prime Minister Narendra Modi failed to make it to the list for the second straight year. This, even as his counterpart across the border, Pakistani PM Imran Khan, entered the coveted list.

Modi, who emerged on the national political stage in 2013-14 has been on the list three times – in 2014, 2015 and 2017 – although the magazine’s editorial view of him shifted each time.

Modi through Time

When Modi first appeared on the list, an annual feature of the magazine since 2004, CNN journalist and noted global affairs commentator, Fareed Zakaria, wrote the brief on him.

Zakaria was both cautious and analytical.

“Modi has a reputation for quick action, encouraging the private sector, and good governance,” Zakaria wrote. “He also has a reputation for autocratic rule and a dark Hindu-nationalist streak.”

In 2015, Time’s choice for the Modi write-up reflected how most of the Western world was extremely upbeat about the future prospects of him as a world leader. Incumbent US President Barack Obama was chosen to write about the Indian prime minister.

“Determined to help more Indians follow in his (Modi’s) path, he’s laid out an ambitious vision to reduce extreme poverty, improve education, empower women and girls and unleash India’s true economic potential while confronting climate change,” Obama wrote.

The Prime Minister didn’t feature in the 2016 list.

The following year, Modi appeared on the Time 100 list but the magazine chose the author and a prominent critic of the Prime Minister, Pankaj Mishra, to write about him.

Mishra pulled no punches.

“In May 2014, long before Donald Trump seemed conceivable as a U.S. President, Narendra Modi became the Prime Minister of the world’s largest democracy,” Mishra wrote. “Nearly three years later, his vision of India’s economic, geopolitical and cultural supremacy is far from being realised, and his extended family of Hindu nationalists have taken to scapegoating secular and liberal intellectuals as well as poor Muslims. Yet Modi’s aura remains undimmed.”

It was the last occasion that Modi appeared on the list. He was not included in 2018 and 2019.

In stark contrast Chinese President Xi Jinping has been a part of the list every year since 2014.

How did Congress leaders fare at Time 100?

The Congress-led United Progressive Alliance (UPA) ruled over New Delhi between 2004 and 2014. In the 10-year period, former prime minister Manmohan Singh featured on the list twice: 2005 and 2010. Former Congress president Sonia Gandhi also featured twice — in 2007 and 2008.

Shashi Tharoor, who would soon go on to join the Congress party, wrote the brief on Sonia Gandhi in 2008. Talking about Gandhi’s entry into politics after the death of her husband and Congress leader Rajiv Gandhi, Tharoor wrote, “The queen retreats into silence and mourning until the insistent supplications of her courtiers compel her to emerge and once again take the destiny of the kingdom into her hands.”

Though there is no clarity on how Time’s editors decide the composition of the list, there seems to be a correlation between economic growth in the country and Indian leaders featuring on the list. The years when Indian GDP growth figures were significantly high, an Indian leader usually featured on the list.

The only exception to this seems to be former BJP Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee. He featured on the inaugural 2004 list, but the brief clearly stated that Vajpayee was being recognised for his peace efforts with Pakistan.

Also read: This is what has angered Narendra Modi this Lok Sabha election


Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism


  1. What can u expect from a Pakistani writer? A najayaz aulad of a Pakistani. His father never married his momma instead shw was a slut in cheif. Modi is the best pm india has ever seen. Working for every sector. He works for evry community. N loves the country most. Than stupid anpad gawar dynasty. So modi can make india great. He has already done alot. So much electricity housing toilet roads solar. No price hike. Than other govts.. Poverty rates decreased dramatically. In up no riots has taken place instead alot of works. So muslims will vote for modi this time.. Congress n mahaMilawat wants the power bcz PAISE NHI MIL RAHEY AB HUMARE PM KAM KRTE H WOH AYANEGE TO KHANE KO MILEGA PAISE OR CORRUPTION KARENGE JO IS SARKAR NE NAI KIYA… So modi modi india india. Modi THE symbol of india. LOVE FROM AN EDUCATED INDIAN MUSLIM 🇮🇳 💕

  2. The outgoing PM (also known for his fervent hugs , record foreign jaunts, and fistfuls of fulsome international awards) seems to have lost his US constituency overflowing with our NRI cousins, too. And though he and his Sangh parivar brigade are ignoring the TIME-honoured list , patriotic citizens can hardly stomach the humiliation implied herein. Or maybe TIME has woken up to its own folly in having extolled him in 2004, just two years after 2002 GUJARAT ! And OBAMA, too, was

  3. When he was first elected Modi generated lot of hype about transformation. 5 years down the line all that hype is gone and he stands exposed for his unstatesmanly comments and lack of involvement in international affairs ( this is despite his record foreign trips).What a fall!!

Comments are closed.

Most Popular