Wednesday, May 31, 2023
Support Our Journalism
HomeIndiaGovernanceRahul walks out of his first House panel on defence meet after 'spat'...

Rahul walks out of his first House panel on defence meet after ‘spat’ on military structures

According to sources, a debate over whether there should be some uniformity across all armed services, as is the case in the US, triggered an argument in the meeting. 

Text Size:

New Delhi: Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, along with two others from his party, Wednesday walked out of his first meeting of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Defence following a verbal spat over a briefing on military structures.

Committee sources said that the briefing was being held on the rank and structures, including their uniform, stars and badges, of the armed officers.

Following a powerpoint presentation, Gandhi objected to wasting the Committee’s time and that of the Chief of Defence Staff Gen. Bipin Rawat who was also present.

Sources said that Rajya Sabha MP and Army veteran Lt Gen. D.P. Vats (Retd) suggested that the Service personnel could have some commonality and clear markings like the US.

He was of the opinion that the Indian military system could incorporate US structure and said that Indian military’s uniform and symbols were complicated.

Gandhi objected to this and said that the forces are the only authority who can decide what the uniform should be. He added that ranks and symbols on the uniform have their own identity that are inspired from traditions.

Also read: Pragya Thakur or Shashi Tharoor — field expertise not necessary to be on Parliament panel


Gandhi also said that politicians should refrain from giving suggestions, and added that the process is tantamount to wasting the time of senior defence personnel.

At this point, committee chairman Jual Oram intervened, saying that members are well within their rights to know about the military structure and hierarchy. He added that members can give suggestions.

Oram said he, as chairman, will decide what suggestions can be given or not and added that Lt Gen. Vats is more qualified to give suggestions related to defence forces.

Then two other Congress members present — Anumula Revanth Reddy and Rajeev Satav — objected to Oram not allowing Gandhi to speak, after which the three walked out.

ThePrint reached chief Congress spokesperson Randeep Surjewala via calls for a comment but did not receive a response.

Other spokespersons of the party, who did not wish to be named, said the Congress is yet to take an official position on the issue, and would not like to comment yet.

“Of course the forces will decide on what the uniform should be. But an MP can give suggestions also,” a source, who attended the meeting, told ThePrint.

Sources who were at the meeting said BJP MP Prathap Simha questioned why Gandhi met with Chinese authorities in 2017 when the Doklam stand-off was on if he was so supportive of the armed forces and respected them.

The defence parliamentary committee has a total of 31 members — 21 from the Lok Sabha, nominated by its Speaker, and 10 from the Rajya Sabha, nominated by its chairman. It is responsible for examining bills pertaining to the Ministry of Defence, along with other defence-related issues of importance in Parliament. The term of office for the members of the committee does not exceed a year.

ThePrint had reported in July that Gandhi had not attended a single meeting of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Defence since its formation as part of the 17th Lok Sabha last year.

Also read: Why Indian Navy is getting a camouflage uniform like the Army and Air Force


Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism


  1. The guy is zero value add anyway. What difference does it make if he walks out?
    And The Print reports this as headline news???

  2. More proof that the man-child has neither the inclination nor the interest in the working of Government. He is entirely preoccupied with the pretensions and publicity of power

  3. This meeting’s give too much details which are hard to comprehend.

    Anyway it’s time to play with PIDDI.

    And it’s not like my great grandfather who surrendered meekly. MODIJI is made of different mettle he will fight.

    So now you the reason why I left.

  4. This comedian is used to having his say in the Congress party but unfortunately the Parliament is not his fiefdom and therefore he should either obey the rules or just shut up.

Comments are closed.

Most Popular