Supreme Court of India | Photo: Manisha Mondal | ThePrint
The Supreme Court of India | Manisha Mondal | ThePrint
Text Size:

New Delhi: Upholding the University Grants Commission (UGC) notification mandating universities to conduct final-year exams by September-end, the Supreme Court Friday said states and union territories cannot promote students without conducting exams as directed by the UGC.

A bench comprising Justices Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy and M.R. Shah said final-year exams for college students have to be held, and that internal assessments will not suffice for conferring degrees.

States and UTs can, however, approach the UGC for an extension of the deadline by which final-year exams should be completed, the court said.

UGC had issued a notification on 6 July, mandating universities to conduct final-year exams by September-end.

Some states had contested the notification. The Maharashtra government, for instance. informed the Supreme Court that its State Disaster Management Authority had on 13 July decided not to conduct exams amid the pandemic.

On this point, the court has now held that the decision of the State Disaster Management Authority will prevail over the UGC guidelines. It, however, added that the SDMA cannot direct that students should be promoted on the basis of previous performance. 

The petitions

The UGC notification was challenged in the Supreme Court through a batch of petitions, including one by 31 students from universities across the country. The petitions noted that the UGC’s decision will compel students to appear for exams during the pandemic, which will be a major risk to their health.

UGC had then defended its deadline last month in the Supreme Court, saying the decision had been taken to “protect the academic future of students”. It had also claimed that a student’s performance in examinations, especially in final year or terminal semester, gives her or him confidence.

Several state governments, including those of Maharashtra, Odisha and West Bengal had, however, resisted the move, citing Covid-19 pandemic and lack of infrastructure. 

The Delhi government had pointed out accessibility issues in conducting online classes. It submitted that “in Delhi’s State universities, best efforts were made to conduct online classes, but the reality of our digital divide is that online classes are not accessible equally by all”.

Due to such issues, Delhi asserted that “the students did not get the kind of preparation needed to attempt a full-fledged examination”.

The court had reserved its judgment in the case on 18 August.

Also read: Why students want NEET & JEE postponed again — health problems, Covid-hit preparations


Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Why news media is in crisis & How you can fix it

India needs free, fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism even more as it faces multiple crises.

But the news media is in a crisis of its own. There have been brutal layoffs and pay-cuts. The best of journalism is shrinking, yielding to crude prime-time spectacle.

ThePrint has the finest young reporters, columnists and editors working for it. Sustaining journalism of this quality needs smart and thinking people like you to pay for it. Whether you live in India or overseas, you can do it here.

Support Our Journalism

Share Your Views


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here