File image of Siddharth Varadarajan | Wikimedia commons
File image of Siddharth Varadarajan | Wikimedia commons
Text Size:

New Delhi: The Uttar Pradesh Police Sunday filed an FIR against The Wire’s founding editor Siddharth Varadarajan in the Rampur district, for tweeting a report about the death of Navreet Singh, the lone fatality in the violence that erupted during the farmers’ Republic Day tractor rally.

While Singh’s postmortem report, accessed by ThePrint, said he died of head injuries, the protesting farmers and his family have been claiming that he lost control of his tractor after he was shot by police. 

Varadarajan had Saturday tweeted a news report by The Wire, which had the Singh family disputing the Delhi Police’s claim that the protester had died because his tractor overturned. Varadarajan referred to a statement made by Singh’s grandfather, who claimed that “a doctor who was part of the autopsy told him a bullet caused the injuries ‘but my hands are tied’”.

The FIR against Varadarajan, based on complaint from Rampur resident Sanju Turaha, has been filed under Sections 153B (imputations, assertions prejudicial to national integration) and 505(2) (statements creating or promoting enmity, hatred or ill will between classes) of the Indian Penal Code.

The FIR refers to Saturday’s tweet. It states that the news report was presented in such a way that it seemed like the statement was made by the autopsy doctor himself, leading to confusion. 

“As a result, Rampur’s people have become resentful, and tension has increased,” it added. “This post certainly seems to be a part of a conspiracy to incite violence with the aim of making an unfair profit by harming the general public.” 

The FIR asserts that Navreet Singh’s postmortem was conducted by three panel doctors and was duly videographed. It also claims that all the three doctors have denied giving any such statement to anybody, against what is claimed by The Wire’s report. 

“Despite this, the tweet has not been removed yet,” the FIR states, adding that post was intended to “disturb peace and law and order” by “intentionally posting provocative posts through social media- Twitter without knowing the right facts”. 

The post, it said, wrongly quoted the government medical officer to claim that Singh had died due to a gunshot, in order to “incite” the general public.

The FIR is the second filed against journalists and others over the past week in Uttar Pradesh on this issue. On Thursday, the Noida police had charged six journalists and Congress MP Shashi Tharoor with sedition over their “social media posts” regarding the farmers’ tractor rally that turned violent during Republic Day Tuesday. The six included Mrinal Pande, Rajdeep Sardesai, Vinod Jose, Zafar Agha, Paresh Nath and Anant Nath.


Also read: As UP sinks, Yogi Adityanath soars — enough to compete for limelight with Modi


DM Rampur had tweeted about ‘law and order problem’

The FIR against Varadarajan was preceded by exchanges between The Wire’s founding editor and the official Twitter account of the Rampur district magistrate.  

In response to Varadarajan’s original tweet, which is still up on Twitter, the official account of the Rampur district magistrate had responded, saying, “We ardently request you to please let’s be sticking to facts and facts only. We hope our request will be sincerely taken up by you. Thank you.”

 

Accompanying this tweet was a denial note by the three government medical officers who conducted the postmortem, claiming that none of them had spoken to anybody from the media and had not made any statement to any journalist about the autopsy. 

In response, Varadarajan informed the DM that the report has been updated to include the official declaration by the three doctors. 

To this, the DM tweeted asking, “Hope you understand your story could cause a law and order problem here. It has already caused tensed situation here. Responsibility?” Hours later, the FIR was registered. 

Varadarajan responded to the FIR Sunday morning on Twitter, calling it “malicious prosecution”. “What’s the IPC provision for ‘malicious prosecution’? Here is the UP Police indulging in it, filing an FIR against me for tweeting about what the grandfather of farmer who was killed in the tractor parade had said on the record!” he tweeted. 

With inputs from Prashant Srivastava.

 

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Why news media is in crisis & How you can fix it

India needs free, fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism even more as it faces multiple crises.

But the news media is in a crisis of its own. There have been brutal layoffs and pay-cuts. The best of journalism is shrinking, yielding to crude prime-time spectacle.

ThePrint has the finest young reporters, columnists and editors working for it. Sustaining journalism of this quality needs smart and thinking people like you to pay for it. Whether you live in India or overseas, you can do it here.

Support Our Journalism

VIEW COMMENTS

9 COMMENTS

  1. Strict penalty is required against all these mischief maker fake journalists (actually they are politicians in journalists garb), irrespective of which ideology they support – right or left. Do the crime, then pay for it.

  2. Now this is an excellent example of ideology driven journalism. The Wire has spun an entire article on a very serious topic based on a single statement of an interested party, with any collaborative evidence. Why does The Wire not believe that this grandfather could be lying? Look at the evidence. If indeed this man was killed by a bullet, is it possible that this was the sole incident of firing by the police? It is possible that not a single other person got injured? If the autopsy was videographed and all three doctors are denying making the statement, which side has more credibility? The FIR against Shri Siddharth Vardharajan, US citizen and brother of Patanjali Vardharajan and spouse of Nandini Sundar is completely appropriate.

  3. If someone does not want to understand the gravity of the situation , and the possible repercussion of certain statements/ tweets could have then it is sad day.

  4. Is Varadarajan above the law? Is he someone special that the law of the land doesn’t apply to him?
    There is a tone of disapproval in your article, and you appear indignant that an FIR was filed against him.

  5. Thankfully the tragic video was captured on camera. Else this fake news would have flown by these journalists. Very sad state of journalism in India.

  6. Although I despise hounding of anybody but this is not hounding, in fact despite my distaste for Arnab’s brand of journalism Arnab faced real hounding and the entire media clan stayed silent at best and displayed schadenfreude at worst.
    I hope justice to be delivered to Varadrajan for continual anti India activities he’s been associated with since over a decade – yes even during the UPA government.

  7. Uttar Pradesh government and government officials always speak the truth.

    If I had said lies instead of truth, there would have been an FIR against me and The Print. So please excuse.

Comments are closed.