scorecardresearch
Add as a preferred source on Google
Monday, September 7, 2026

Support our Journalism

9th Anniversary: Free Tote & Mug

Subscribe
HomeFeaturesWhat are employee influencers? A corporate nightmare

What are employee influencers? A corporate nightmare

Companies are turning staff with big followings into brand promoters, but with it comes a hoard of legal issues.

Follow Us :
Text Size:

New Delhi: After lifestyle and food influencers, a new type of content creator is making headlines. The employee influencers. But apart from their content, the trend also raises new legal risks for companies across several sectors.

According to a Bloomberg report, companies across several sectors are tapping workers with strong social media followings to promote products. It reflects a larger workplace cultural shift that creates potential for legal liability.

But the question remains: What is an employee influencer?

An employee influencer is a staff member who uses their personal social media presence to share real work experiences, promote company culture and shape how internal and external audiences view a brand.

The report added that in the United States, Starbucks announced a partnership with TikTok to boost employee-driven storytelling, and Gap Inc. expanded its creative affiliate and social media programs to include employees. But this paradigm shift is creating a legal minefield.

Uncertainty over salaries

The Bloomberg report found that it’s not always obvious how companies are paying employee-creators beyond regular salaries.

However, the collaboration between Starbucks and TikTok states that the partnership will give employees content opportunities as well as ad revenue sharing.

Meanwhile, Walmart restricts the employment relationship with creator program participants.

The report added that many companies with creator programs bypass traditional cash compensation and instead offer perks like free trips.

“…or products to avoid muddying the initial terms of employment and baseline job description,” said Lia Haberman, a creator economy consultant.

According to the report, the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) requires monetary compensation for work employers knew about or have reason to believe is being performed.

“Violations of the FLSA’s overtime rule for work performed over 40 hours in a workweek could result in substantial civil penalties, back wages, liquidated damages, and legal costs for employers,” the report read.

Further legal risks can be greater in certain states like California, which mandates pay for work employers know or should know.

Another legal issue is who owns the content and what happens post-employment, even though US copyright law gives employers automatic ownership of work created within the scope of employment.

But ownership becomes complicated when employees create content on their personal accounts and grow their audience.

(Edited by Insha Jalil Waziri)

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube, Telegram & WhatsApp

Nine Years, Made Possible by Readers

In 2017, Shekhar Gupta started ThePrint with a simple belief: Indian readers want journalism that asks why and what next, not just what. And that enough of them would be willing to pay for good journalism.

Nine years on, that belief has held.

And, in these nine years, we’ve stayed true to our mission. We’ve been asking the follow-up questions, going beyond the headlines and explaining what’s actually happening. We’ve travelled across the country to bring you in-depth, visually-compelling stories from the ground.

It’s been nine years of readers choosing to make this possible. If you’d like to be one of them:

Support ThePrint

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular