Loan waivers & lending targets for banks are signs of lazy govt, Raghuram Rajan says
Economy

Loan waivers & lending targets for banks are signs of lazy govt, Raghuram Rajan says

Former RBI governor Raghuram Rajan has also urged all political parties to come together and agree to shun farm loan waivers.

   
File photo of Raghuram Rajan, former RBI governor | David Paul Morris/Bloomberg

File photo of Raghuram Rajan, former RBI governor | David Paul Morris/Bloomberg

Former RBI governor Raghuram Rajan has also urged all political parties to come together and agree to shun farm loan waivers.

New Delhi: Loan waivers and government-imposed credit targets for banks are signs of a lazy government and should be avoided at all costs, former Reserve Bank of India governor Raghuram Rajan said Friday in a note on banking reforms.

Rajan’s remarks come amid reports that the Narendra Modi government was likely to announce a farm loan waiver to the tune of Rs 4 lakh crore ahead of next year’s general election, after farmers’ woes were cited as a primary reason for the defeat of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in assembly elections in the heartland states.

A populist sop, farm loan waivers have long been a favoured tool for successive state and central governments to quell farmer disenchantment, although several experts have questioned their long-term viability.

Making the situation more precarious for banks is pressure from the government to meet lending targets to ease credit flow to various sectors.

Rajan’s note was published on the University of Chicago website ahead of a conference of economists in New Delhi in which he is participating.


Also read: It all began under UPA: Raghuram Rajan gives Modi ammunition against Congress on bad loans


‘An environment for NPAs’

“Uncompensated government mandates have been imposed on PSBs [public sector banks] for a long time,” he wrote. “This is lazy government – if an action is worth doing, it should be paid for out of budgetary resources. It also is against the interests of minority shareholders in PSBs.”

“Finally, it does not draw the private sector in to compete for such activities,” he wrote, adding that the government should incentivise all banks to take up activities and not impose them on a few, especially as the privileges associated with a banking licence diminish.

Rajan also sought to highlight the associated risks.

“Government-imposed credit targets are often achieved by abandoning appropriate due diligence, creating the environment for future NPAs [non-performing assets],” he said, “Loan waivers, as the RBI has repeatedly argued, vitiate the credit culture, and stress the budgets of the waiving state or central government. They are poorly targeted, and eventually reduce the flow of credit.”

He added that agriculture needed serious attention, but not through loan waivers.  “An all-party agreement to this effect would be in the nation’s interest,” Rajan said.


Also read: Raghuram Rajan blames over-optimistic bankers during UPA rule for banking mess


Keeping state-run banks capitalised

Rajan, along with fellow economists Abhijit Banerjee, Gita Gopinath, Neelkanth Mishra, Karthik Muralidharan, Eswar Prasad and Sajjid Chinoy, has penned a five-year economic agenda for India that covers a host of issues, including macroeconomy, health, education, banking reforms and infrastructure.

In his note, India’s former top banker also batted for well-capitalised state-run banks and more professional boards to appoint their CEOs.

“Public sector bank boards are still not adequately professionalised, and the government, rather than a more independent body, still decides board appointments, with the inevitable politicisation,” he said.

“Eventually, strong boards should be entrusted with all bank-related decisions, including CEO appointment, but held responsible for performance,” he added, “Strategic investors could help improve governance.”

Keeping PSBs well capitalised, is “simply a good accounting practice, for it prevents the government from building up contingent liabilities on bank balance sheets that a future government will have to pay for”.