Indian Air Force
Three MiG-29 jets fly in a formation | Indian Air Force official website
Text Size:

An IAF position paper instead recommends strengthening of joint operations command, says integrated theatre commands will be a strain on resources.

New Delhi: The Indian Air Force (IAF) has recommended the strengthening of the joint operations command (JOCOM) for better synergy among India’s military services, arguing that this would do away with the need for integrated theatre commands (ITC).

The IAF has argued that the integrated theatre commands would strain its resources, according to a position paper read by ThePrint.

This comes days after defence minister Nirmala Sitharaman said the government wanted the military to move towards creating theatre commands.

“We want a bottom-up approach, create the base and then add layers to it, that way it will not be top-down,” she said at a press conference Friday, adding that the “issue of jointness is very dear to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s heart”.

The IAF position was circulated within the military and the political leadership first in August last year but it has now gained greater currency since a serving navy officer, Rear Admiral Monty Khanna, wrote in a paper for the military think-tank Centre for Joint Warfare Studies (CENJOWS), alleging that the IAF had a “hidden agenda” in opposing theatre commands.

The IAF has taken offence to the paper in which the Rear Admiral, a chief instructor with the Defence Services Staff College in Wellington, has alleged that the IAF was opposing theatre commands as it was intent on keeping avenues for promotions of its senior officers.

While the JOCOM comprises the chiefs of the armed forces or commanders designated by them to synergise operations, an ITC would essentially be helmed by a theatre commander (from any of the three armed forces) and would include within it a land forces component, a maritime forces component and an air component.

In an ITC, operational commanders at the field-level would ultimately report to the theatre commander irrespective of service. The JOCOM would maintain the independence of each service that would continue to report to the respective service chief. 

Only integrated service’

In its position paper against the ITCs, the IAF has argued that it is the only service that is integrated, bottom-up, with each of the other two armed forces (navy and army). It has stated that its assets were always readily available to the other services, including after the terror attacks at the Pathankot Air Force Station in January 2016, and after the Uri attack, when it was involved in the conduct of the September 2016 “surgical strikes”.

The IAF has further argued that since its mandate is to guard India’s territorial integrity and airspace — meaning that it is not essentially an ‘expeditionary’ force (operating way beyond the homeland) such as that of the US— a JOCOM would facilitate the distribution of its limited assets depending on the contingency. The JOCOM technically exists even today but, the IAF has argued, it must meet at least once a month in peacetime and more often depending on the exigency.

One IAF official told ThePrint that its latest Gagan Shakti exercise had tested the concept of distributing assets in three contingencies: a live western border (with Pakistan); a live northern border (with China) and with both borders being live. It swung aircraft and other platforms from the west to the east and to the north.

This was possible because of the very nature of the air force (any air force) that is mandated to guard a largely contiguous territory such as India’s, the IAF has argued. A single Hercules C-130 aircraft has flown the land borders of India in a single day without requiring to land. (It was fuelled in mid-air). “The IAF does not feel that it is constricted by space,” said the officer.

‘Surprised that Admiral went public’

The officer said it was surprising that the Navy Admiral had chosen to go public with what is essentially a “churning and head-banging within the military” on a professional issue of force restructuring and command authority “when there are service rules against doing so.”

The IAF has also repeatedly pointed out that it needs more assets. The 32 squadrons (and dwindling) of fighter aircraft that it currently has is not enough for its mandate. There is a reason why the IAF has been authorised 42 squadrons “and that is to fulfil our mandate”, explained the officer.

 “It is because we can decide where and when and which platform to deploy that maintaining integration with the navy and the army at all levels is important to us. We are not against jointness. But we do not favour the imposition of foreign concepts like the ITC (Integrated Theatre Commands) whose operational value in our environment is suspect,” said the officer.

ThePrint is now on Telegram. For the best reports & opinion on politics, governance and more, subscribe to ThePrint on Telegram.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel.

6 Comments Share Your Views

6 COMMENTS

  1. Our PM and defense minister and Team has no understanding of the structure and functioning of the arm forces. They should rather take the advice of the army navy air force and approve their requirements officially. Occasionally they can be happy with the joy rides on tanks ships and fighter jets

  2. People keep blaming Politicians for the state of the military when Politicians know NOTHING about the military.

    Why isn’t there any blame on the DECADES of military leaders who have failed continuously – be it in indeginization, be it in building resources or devleoping even reserve ammunitions or basic rifles for our soldiers ?

    Is the Prime Minister or Finance Minister supposed to decide which rifle Indian soldiers should use ? OR which planes we our fighter pilots should use ? Or when we need more fighter jets or Naval submarines ??

  3. Dear sir it is not a good idea to draw attention of defence aspects to public domain , but sometimes it is only way to sort out the situation as the admiral had done??????, normally our defence requirements only 2 aspects army and air,or air and navy but a cordial relationship between the 3 is needed in the changing world a cyber aspect to be in mind also , avoid press for better regards apsinha

  4. Air force may think that they are superior than army and navy.Also army and navy life is very difficult.PM President and defence minister should do whatever is good for country, opposition parties , media and judiciary must be taken into cobfidence.

  5. Since when has what is ‘dear to PM’s heart’ the deciding factor in armed forces strategy?
    Mustn’t forget that in 2015, a quick hug and dinner with then PM Nawaz Sharif was what Modiji thought was a great strategy.
    It’s a hug that cost the people of India Rs 2.86 lakhs – the amount that Pakistan billed India as “Route Navigation Charges”.

    • If 2.8 lakhs is what an attempt for “peace” with Pakistan costs then it is a VERY CHEAP price to pay considering it is costing India CRORES per day to operate our base in Siachin alone – forget the 7 lakh soldiers and CRPF deployed in J&K or the 3-4 lakh deployed in NE .

      Even a good TV (OLED) today costs more than 2.8 lakhs!

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here