Monday, March 20, 2023
HomeDefence‘Make in India has failed in defence sector’ — experts highlight importance...

‘Make in India has failed in defence sector’ — experts highlight importance of self-reliance

Experts at the Military Literature Festival in Chandigarh list why Modi govt's flagship Make in India programme has failed to take off in the defence sector.

Text Size:

Chandigarh: Absence of a clear policy, lack of accountability for defence public sector units and a perennial fund crunch — these are the reasons listed by experts as to why Narendra Modi government’s flagship ‘Make in India’ programme failed to take off in the defence sector.

Former Army chief General (retired) V.P. Malik, Lieutenant General (retired) Arun Sahni and former financial adviser in the defence ministry Amit Cowshish were speaking at a session on ‘Make in India and the Nation’s Security’ at the third edition of the Military Literature Festival organised by the Punjab government in Chandigarh. The festival began Friday and will continue until Sunday.

Talking about being self-reliant in defence, General Malik, who headed the Army during the Kargil war in 1999, said self-reliance was one of the most important lessons India learnt from the conflict.

“Unless we become adequately self-reliant, our national security remains vulnerable,” Malik said.

Giving an example of the importance of self-reliance, Malik said during the Kargil conflict, the Army had ordered for a purchase of two regiments of 155 mm Denel guns from South Africa, but when the weapons were to be delivered, they said they don’t have them.

The former Army chief also gave the example of satellite imagery, which when bought at a huge cost from another country, turned out to be three years old and futile for the forces.

Malik also spoke about weapon-locating radars, which the Army had to buy in 2003 at double the cost of the initial price, but ultimately it did not purchase them after the DRDO promised to develop the radars.

“I don’t think we have adequate accountability in some of our defence organisations like the DRDO (Defence Research Development Organisation),” he said.

“When you give protection to your defence PSUs and do not give adequate assurance to the private sector, it will be discouraged…Then everyone is working in silos and as a result, there is no interaction,” he said, adding that it is a “crucial reason why Make in India has failed to make progress in the defence sector”.

He further said the armed forces are always blamed for supporting imports, but added that they have no other alternatives.

‘Make in India started off as a slogan’

Cowshish highlighted the policy lacunae when it comes to implementing ‘Make in India’ in defence. 

“There is no clear policy on ‘Make in India’ in defence. Talking about indigenisation, what is it? Is it cost-saving or import-substitution or innovation? We are not clear,” he said. 

Sahni, meanwhile, said ‘Make in India’ started off as a slogan and “you can have slogans for social causes. But it needed processes and procedures to be rectified. It needs to be opened up.” 

Sahni also said more funds needed to be allocated for the upgrade of military warfare. “We need a more serious approach where accountability is fixed for producing unusable products at the public sector institutions working in the sphere,” he said.

Also read: Defence ministry approves admission of girls to 5 Sainik schools for 2020-21


Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism


  1. The babus, netas and their cronies are the ones who’ve ensured that military hardware must be bought from abroad, as it allows them to get their hefty ‘commissions’, which are deposited in secret bank accounts abroad???

  2. First there should be a Make Indians campaign. Then only will Make in India work.

    Engineers and technicians make things. The current training in most Engg. colleges is woeful.

  3. As long as sloganeering and event management remain the core competencies of this government expect no concrete outcomes. After all wasted years under UPA now wasted years under NDA. The more things change the more they remain the same.

  4. It’s the political leaning of the author that decides the way to twist the status of the initiative of defence production being promoted by Modi government. Author has opted for criticising the government to score a political point which is futile in today’s information age. People know even production of toys take time. Unlike Congress’s anti national governments, Modi’s nationalist government has taken initiative for self reliant in defence production. Modi haters have no work other than criticize the government which is meaningless if done with the tone of accusations.

  5. A better outcome was possible over the last five years. Many credible private sector firms had showed interest in entering the defence sector, some have given a good account of themselves. Perhaps one good Rakshi Mantri over the entire five years would have helped. If there is a talent crunch in the ministerial pool, there are almost ninety Secretaries in Delhi. Empower people, trust them, ask them to deliver. Let them play golf occasionally, take the weekends off.

Comments are closed.

Most Popular