scorecardresearch
Saturday, April 27, 2024
Support Our Journalism
HomeDefenceIndia firm, won’t agree to one-sided disengagement in Ladakh at talks with...

India firm, won’t agree to one-sided disengagement in Ladakh at talks with China today

India, China military commanders will meet at Chushul-Moldo for the eighth round of Corps Commander-level talks. It is learnt that no major breakthrough is expected.

Follow Us :
Text Size:

New Delhi: With senior military commanders meeting at Chushul-Moldo in eastern Ladakh Friday after a gap of nearly a month, India is going to make it clear to China that it will not agree to any one-sided disengagement proposal, ThePrint has learnt.

This is the first Corps Commander level talk that Lt Gen. P.G.K. Menon will be heading. He had earlier attended two such talks, but the delegation was led by then 14 Corps Commander Lt Gen. Harinder Singh.

Sources in the defence and security establishment told ThePrint no major breakthrough is expected and both sides will remain at the frontlines even as the seven-month stand-off enters the icy-cold winter months.

Meanwhile, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh Thursday said India is determined to protect its sovereignty and territorial integrity in the face of “unilateralism and aggression”.

However, he also said India attaches importance to peaceful resolution of differences through dialogue and is committed to respecting various agreements inked for maintaining peace along the borders.

Asked about the Indian stand at the eighth round of Corps Commander-level talks, a source said: “India is going to be firm on its stand. The stand is that we will not agree to any one-sided disengagement proposal by China. It has to be a mutually beneficial process.”

As reported by ThePrint, China has proposed a slew of steps to ease tensions along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in eastern Ladakh, which includes withdrawing tanks and artillery guns from the forward areas back to their peacetime locations, Indian troops vacating strategic heights in the southern banks of Pangong Tso and making Finger 4 in the northern banks a no-go area.

“We have been insisting on an holistic approach. It was China which started the aggression first and they should be the ones to disengage first. And it should happen from all friction points and not just specific areas,” the source said.


Also read: LAC crisis will be a long haul, can cost both India and China


‘China cannot think it can bully its way’

A second source said China cannot insist on talks focused on just the southern and northern banks of Pangong Tso.

“The process has to involve all friction points, including the Depsang Plains. China cannot think it can bully its way. If China is not going back, we are also not going back. China will just draw itself in a continued stand-off for which we are prepared,” the source added.

China is focused only on the Southern banks of Pangong Tso, which India occupied after checkmating the Chinese ‘in race to the passes’ on the intervening night of 29-30 August.

‘Classic Chinese strategy’

During the last Corps Commander-level talks on 12 October, China offered partial withdrawal from the northern banks.

China has proposed that Indian troops limit their patrolling until Finger 3 in the northern bank and their troops will limit their patrolling until Finger 5.

“This is the classic Chinese strategy of taking two steps ahead and taking back one step. Chinese want to show that they are doing a favour by moving back to Finger 5. Why should we limit patrolling to Finger 3 when LAC is at Finger 8?” the second source said.


Also read: India can’t afford a knee-jerk reaction on the LAC. That’s what China is hoping for


 

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube, Telegram & WhatsApp

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism

1 COMMENT

  1. weapons and tanks are there, difficult to move out. New Delhi doesn’t disengage at all. Thus turning out to be China one-sided disengagment. will they accept?

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular