An NYT report Sunday revealed that US President Donald Trump paid only $750 as income tax in 2016 and 2017, and nothing in 10 out of the last 15 years.
Investigators have used WhatsApp chats as evidence to question suspects in NCB-Bollywood drug case that has seen Deepika Padukone's name emerge, as well as in the Delhi riots case.
The codes on industrial relations; occupational safety, health and working conditions; and social security aim to simplify archaic labour laws and give impetus to economic activity.
A CBI court has asked the agency to file criminal cases against Shourie & four others as allegations against them in the corruption case prima facie appeared to be true.
A critical Covid-19 patient’s medical oxygen requirement is approximately 86,000 litres per day. With cases exploding, states are looking to stack up on the vital life-saver.
Five years ago, I loved the talking stage. But in 2024, my dating app conversations have been as bland as boiled eggs. After having one too many, you lose your appetite.
The mechanical canine, showcased at the annual 15-day Golden Dragon 2024 exercise, can move forward and backward, jump, and lie down like real canines.
2024 was a one-candidate election. Modi was the only candidate for whom BJP sought votes, and he was the only opponent most of its rivals wanted defeated.
Per your map, does it mean India Valley sector in Ladakh is claimed by China as per 1959 line? Demchok, Chumur, Koyal, Dungti…almost up to Chushul. Demchok village itself is split into two one half is in China.
Does not look like they are interested in Galwan Valley? That’s interesting.
They don’t seem to claim any territories in Himachal though…do they have any claims in Himachal?
Just to understand the border dispute better:
The 1959 claim line (dotted line) lies further North-East to the LAC drawn in the fuzzy map above.
Doesn’t the mean China wants to go back from the current LAC line to the 1959 claim line?
If that is the case, why is PLA moving forward (i.e. Westward in the noth bank of Pangong Tso)???
India is protesting the 1959 claim line, even though it is further into current Chinese controlled territory, because India believes only in McMahon line from 1914 Shimla Convention???
Pangong Tso and Spanggur Tso they want us to go westward…I think this is to protect Kongka La. This prevents us from pushing eastwards at the bottom Northeast portion of ladakh
There is no clarification on where the 1959 claim line lies with reference to the current flash points and the reader is just fed some history about Nehru-Zhou’s failed meetings in Delhi. In case there is some advantage to India in the Eastern sector, we must insist on the Mc Mahon line in east and then discuss further about the 1959 LAC before rejecting it completely. There is no need to follow Nehru strictly.
In any case LAC is not a final border as that will be decided much later.
Per your map, does it mean India Valley sector in Ladakh is claimed by China as per 1959 line? Demchok, Chumur, Koyal, Dungti…almost up to Chushul. Demchok village itself is split into two one half is in China.
Does not look like they are interested in Galwan Valley? That’s interesting.
They don’t seem to claim any territories in Himachal though…do they have any claims in Himachal?
It is clear China is doing to India what India does to Pakistan……………make unreasonable claims because it can !!!
Just to understand the border dispute better:
The 1959 claim line (dotted line) lies further North-East to the LAC drawn in the fuzzy map above.
Doesn’t the mean China wants to go back from the current LAC line to the 1959 claim line?
If that is the case, why is PLA moving forward (i.e. Westward in the noth bank of Pangong Tso)???
India is protesting the 1959 claim line, even though it is further into current Chinese controlled territory, because India believes only in McMahon line from 1914 Shimla Convention???
Pangong Tso and Spanggur Tso they want us to go westward…I think this is to protect Kongka La. This prevents us from pushing eastwards at the bottom Northeast portion of ladakh
There is no clarification on where the 1959 claim line lies with reference to the current flash points and the reader is just fed some history about Nehru-Zhou’s failed meetings in Delhi. In case there is some advantage to India in the Eastern sector, we must insist on the Mc Mahon line in east and then discuss further about the 1959 LAC before rejecting it completely. There is no need to follow Nehru strictly.
In any case LAC is not a final border as that will be decided much later.
Something wrong ! Image contradictory to article.
Check again and correct the image depicting LAC and 1959 claim lines !!