In episode 700 of 'Cut The Clutter', Shekhar Gupta explains the intricacies of BJP-JJP trust vote win in Haryana and the role played by the farmers’ agitation.
The disconnect between assembly and Lok Sabha election results for BJP were not due to a momentary surge of nationalism but rather a larger structural shift in Indian electoral politics.
Considering 50 years of 1971, the Commanders' meet could have been held at Defence College, Wellington, the resting place of Field Marshal Sam Maneckshaw.
Formally and openly engaging the Taliban is a high-cost strategy. But India has long supported dissidents and insurgents to stand for elections within its own boundaries.
It’s a valid question in context of Myanmar’s history. Yet what can the international community do? There are limited options given UNSC is constrained by member states & their veto.
Nothing was too inconsequential for them to report: Aaj Tak looked at potential homes for Mamata in Nandigram while others caught up with the CM while she made tea.
History says this upheaval will also pass. But the monarchy will be rightly scrutinized for signs that it takes racial equality — and racism — seriously.
A public meeting, where the women voiced their protest, took place this month in Delhi, grounded on the findings of an AIDWA survey, covering 9,000 women borrowers.
Joint Doctrine for Special Forces Operations, released Wednesday, also outlines plans for the future expansion of AFSOD and the creation of Joint Service Training Institutes.
Putin sees this as a victory. Europeans have decided to deal with Trump on his terms for the sake of the larger Western alliance. We look at the lessons for us in India.
This article is co-authored by a lady from JNU and published in The Print. So it ticks all the right boxes for political correctness. How will our luddite liberals, selective secularists and loony Left rubbish it?
Namahsudras were always Hindus. They have Sanskrit-derived names like otgher Bengalis, and participate in ALL Hindu festivals, rituals and socio-religious practices like marriage, annaprasan, sradh, etc.
This kind of whitewashing while being a PhD makes a mockery of trials and tribulations suffered by Hindus.
J N mandal did not just return. After leading Hindu community to stay back in east Pakistan he was responsible for their killings. Once mawali maskin sidelined him he had no place to go but return to India. Wish he had same foresight as Babasaheb Ambedkar.
Maricjhapi is a blot on our democracy much before Kashmiri Hindu genocide. Communist just like their masters Stalin and mao massacred their own people with impunity. Yet the bhadralok is servile to them.
Here we are again half a century later with Bengali Hindu facing the same situation like 1905, 1946, 1947, 1971. Yet again if they don’t learn their lessons they will soon run out of places to run.
The only thing that should matter is you are Hindus first. Everything will be okay afterwards and no one needs to what jati gotra you belong to.
cPlease understand D. Syama Prasad Mookerjee demanded and had Bengal partitioned. His plea was Hindu culture and religion for which he wrote to Mountbatten a secret letter saying even if India remained undivided Bengal must be partitioned. The upper caste politicians do not tell reason publicly. They tell things that keep them in safe haven. Please note that 69% of Brahmans belonged belonged to west Bengal, a proportion no other caste boasted except Mahishya with 82%. 66% of Kayastha and 64% of Baidya belonged to East Bengal where as 92% Namasudras were from East Bengal. Kayastha 16,00,000 and Baidya [a very small caste, less than 1,30,000 souls jumped to Dr. Syama P. Mookerjee’s bandwagon and deceived the entire population for partition of Bengal. Brahmans were less than 15,00,000 as against 22,00,000 Namasudras. The Namasudras were scattered as refugees all over India by the uppter caste lords who were rulers after indpendence.
Nobody will realise their pains and sufferings.
Maharashtra was untouchaed by partition and hence Dr. B R Ambedkar did not had the misfortune to suffer the fate as a disenfranchised man.
This tragedy nobody understood.
Brahmans had no way out but to demand partition as they had opporessed, expoited and cheated every one right and left—low castes, untouchables and above all the Muslims who became their inveterate enemies.
In eyes of Muslims all Hindus, whether Brahmin, Dalit or OBC is kaffir and does not deserve human rights. becoming Buddhist or Jain would not help either. According to Islam Jews & Christians are Dhimnis with certain rights, all other faiths are Kaffir. It is only matter of time when they have power to impose their idea like Taliban, Al Qaeda or ISIS did.
It is time brain dead people like you understand that fact, unless of course if you are a Taqiyya.
bjp has not even mentioned CAA in its electoral campaign for this election and the matuas have understood that they have been taken for a ride. and no rules for identification have been laid down till now. there is strong discontent. and again matuas have been given aadhar cards, ration cards, voter Ids and have been regularly voting also. enjoying all the benefits as enjoyed by any other indian citizen. the pundits may be proved wrong agian.
CAA is on the card, unlike people like u who profit from muslims butchering dalits, atleast the dalit lead BJP is doing something about it. Matuas never got voter cards or land, that was the upper caste syed muslims, u got no idea
Arvind should have been bold enough to write who was the Brahmin ruler who ordered the shooting down of thousands of Namshudra Dalits in Marijhapi.
None other than comrade Jyoti Basu, the PB member of CPIM and the then CM of W Bengal. This is program larger than Sikh massacre of 1984. Come name and shame him.
All true, except that Shri Jyoti Basu was a Kayastha, or to be precise, Kulin Kayastha. He was not a Brahmin.
Kulin Kayastha? What is that? Who had done investiture for them as kulin?
Did a king of Ballal Sen’s temperament decorate the servants who accompanied the imported Brahmins from Kanauj. This seems ridiculous. Why were Brahmans of Kanauj who had/have surnames Dwivedi, Trivedi, Chaturvedi, Tewari, Pandey, Shukla, etc denominated as Banerjee, Chatterjee Mukherjee on their arrival in Bengal overnight? Same argument hold water for Kayasthas?
Do anybody know W. C. Bonnerjee [first President of Indian National Congress in 1885] was a kulin Brahman? Bonnerjee’s ancestor was, on father side Balla Sen, a Sudra who had a Brahmin concubine on his mothe’s side. Baidya ruler of Bengal fathered a child on his concubine. The basterd, it is claimed, was a scholar and was annointed as a kulin, called Panditratni. Douting Toms, if any may please read the following two volumes:
1. John Wilson, Indian Caste, 1877. [This writer was the first Vice-Chancellor]
2. Jogendranath Bhattacharya, Hindu Caste and Sect, 1896.
Ask any question to clear doubts, I’ll clarify.
Just proves how other parties and political analysts focussed on dividing the Hindu on caste lines. BJP is clearly pan-caste party focussed on uplift of all sections of society.
This article is co-authored by a lady from JNU and published in The Print. So it ticks all the right boxes for political correctness. How will our luddite liberals, selective secularists and loony Left rubbish it?
Namahsudras were always Hindus. They have Sanskrit-derived names like otgher Bengalis, and participate in ALL Hindu festivals, rituals and socio-religious practices like marriage, annaprasan, sradh, etc.
This kind of whitewashing while being a PhD makes a mockery of trials and tribulations suffered by Hindus.
J N mandal did not just return. After leading Hindu community to stay back in east Pakistan he was responsible for their killings. Once mawali maskin sidelined him he had no place to go but return to India. Wish he had same foresight as Babasaheb Ambedkar.
Maricjhapi is a blot on our democracy much before Kashmiri Hindu genocide. Communist just like their masters Stalin and mao massacred their own people with impunity. Yet the bhadralok is servile to them.
Here we are again half a century later with Bengali Hindu facing the same situation like 1905, 1946, 1947, 1971. Yet again if they don’t learn their lessons they will soon run out of places to run.
The only thing that should matter is you are Hindus first. Everything will be okay afterwards and no one needs to what jati gotra you belong to.
Jisne shaastra uthaya wo shastri
Jisne shastra uthaya wo shatriya
cPlease understand D. Syama Prasad Mookerjee demanded and had Bengal partitioned. His plea was Hindu culture and religion for which he wrote to Mountbatten a secret letter saying even if India remained undivided Bengal must be partitioned. The upper caste politicians do not tell reason publicly. They tell things that keep them in safe haven. Please note that 69% of Brahmans belonged belonged to west Bengal, a proportion no other caste boasted except Mahishya with 82%. 66% of Kayastha and 64% of Baidya belonged to East Bengal where as 92% Namasudras were from East Bengal. Kayastha 16,00,000 and Baidya [a very small caste, less than 1,30,000 souls jumped to Dr. Syama P. Mookerjee’s bandwagon and deceived the entire population for partition of Bengal. Brahmans were less than 15,00,000 as against 22,00,000 Namasudras. The Namasudras were scattered as refugees all over India by the uppter caste lords who were rulers after indpendence.
Nobody will realise their pains and sufferings.
Maharashtra was untouchaed by partition and hence Dr. B R Ambedkar did not had the misfortune to suffer the fate as a disenfranchised man.
This tragedy nobody understood.
Brahmans had no way out but to demand partition as they had opporessed, expoited and cheated every one right and left—low castes, untouchables and above all the Muslims who became their inveterate enemies.
In eyes of Muslims all Hindus, whether Brahmin, Dalit or OBC is kaffir and does not deserve human rights. becoming Buddhist or Jain would not help either. According to Islam Jews & Christians are Dhimnis with certain rights, all other faiths are Kaffir. It is only matter of time when they have power to impose their idea like Taliban, Al Qaeda or ISIS did.
It is time brain dead people like you understand that fact, unless of course if you are a Taqiyya.
bjp has not even mentioned CAA in its electoral campaign for this election and the matuas have understood that they have been taken for a ride. and no rules for identification have been laid down till now. there is strong discontent. and again matuas have been given aadhar cards, ration cards, voter Ids and have been regularly voting also. enjoying all the benefits as enjoyed by any other indian citizen. the pundits may be proved wrong agian.
CAA is on the card, unlike people like u who profit from muslims butchering dalits, atleast the dalit lead BJP is doing something about it. Matuas never got voter cards or land, that was the upper caste syed muslims, u got no idea
Arvind should have been bold enough to write who was the Brahmin ruler who ordered the shooting down of thousands of Namshudra Dalits in Marijhapi.
None other than comrade Jyoti Basu, the PB member of CPIM and the then CM of W Bengal. This is program larger than Sikh massacre of 1984. Come name and shame him.
All true, except that Shri Jyoti Basu was a Kayastha, or to be precise, Kulin Kayastha. He was not a Brahmin.
Kulin Kayastha? What is that? Who had done investiture for them as kulin?
Did a king of Ballal Sen’s temperament decorate the servants who accompanied the imported Brahmins from Kanauj. This seems ridiculous. Why were Brahmans of Kanauj who had/have surnames Dwivedi, Trivedi, Chaturvedi, Tewari, Pandey, Shukla, etc denominated as Banerjee, Chatterjee Mukherjee on their arrival in Bengal overnight? Same argument hold water for Kayasthas?
Do anybody know W. C. Bonnerjee [first President of Indian National Congress in 1885] was a kulin Brahman? Bonnerjee’s ancestor was, on father side Balla Sen, a Sudra who had a Brahmin concubine on his mothe’s side. Baidya ruler of Bengal fathered a child on his concubine. The basterd, it is claimed, was a scholar and was annointed as a kulin, called Panditratni. Douting Toms, if any may please read the following two volumes:
1. John Wilson, Indian Caste, 1877. [This writer was the first Vice-Chancellor]
2. Jogendranath Bhattacharya, Hindu Caste and Sect, 1896.
Ask any question to clear doubts, I’ll clarify.
Just proves how other parties and political analysts focussed on dividing the Hindu on caste lines. BJP is clearly pan-caste party focussed on uplift of all sections of society.
BJP should do what it takes to unite Hindus all over India.